ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: Research data from the Field Research Facility (FRF) http://www.frf.usace.army.mil/
    Keywords: FRF
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/zip, 7 datasets
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: USACE / FRF has maintained wave buoys around the 17 m and/or 20 m depth contour since 1980. Over the years, we have used three different types of waverider buoys manufactured by Datawell B.V. (Haarlem, Netherlands). From 1980 until 1996, we used non-directional buoys, first the 0.7 m hull diameter design and then the 0.9 m hull diameter design. The buoys operate by recording the output of an accelerometer suspended in fluid and gimbaled (Hippy-40). For data prior to September 1986, data were recorded at 2 or 4 Hz and record lengths were either 34 or 17 minutes, respectively. Collection intervals were either three hours or six hours. From September 1986 to November 1996 data was collected hourly. Frequency spectra were computed using the Welch method with 50% overlapped ensembles [1]. From the end of 1996 onward, we have maintained 0.9 m hull diameter Directional Waverider MkII and MKIII buoys [2] that, in addition to vertical acceleration, also measure two orthogonal components of horizontal acceleration. From Feb 1997 to May 2005, time series were collected at 1.28 Hz and cross-spectral analysis was performed on shore [3, 4]. Between May 2005 and May 2013, directional Fourier coefficients computed on-board the buoy and transmitted onshore. Since May 2013, data analysis has been manged through the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP), UCSD San Diego, CA. Data are transmitted via an Iridium satellite link at half-hour intervals. Two dimensional (2D) frequency-direction spectra are computed using an Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator (IMLE) method [5]. For more information see FRF data paper, FRF website and data portal, and CDIP website. [1] Welch, P (1967) [2] de Vries, JJ (2014) [3] Longuet-Higgins, M.S., Cartwright, D.E. and Smith, N.D. (1963) [4] Earle, M.D., Steele, K.E. and Wang, D.W.C. (1999) [5] Oltman-Shay, J. and Guza, R.T. (1984)
    Keywords: coastal wave; CT; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; ocean wave; significant wave height; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave buoy; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 4.7 MBytes
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: This data include a unique series of repetitive surveys (1979-now) of shore-perpendicular profile lines surrounding the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Field Research Facility (FRF) in Duck, NC. The surveys typically include 28 lines which extend from 600 m south of the FRF research pier to 600 m north. Special surveys may extend the coverage further. Surveys are typically monthly and after major storms but may be done as frequently as daily during special experiments (DUCK82, DUCK85, SuperDuck '86, DELILAH '90, DUCK94, SandyDuck 1997, DUCK98 and MORPHOS 2008, etc.). Profile lines are spaced ~45 m apart and extend from the primary dune line to approximately 2 km offshore (-15 m isobath NAVD88). Profile lines are numbered according to their FRF coordinate longshore distance in meters. 4 lines (1097, 1006, 1 and -91) were surveyed biweekly until ~2007. During the experiments, surveys were conducted more frequently of an area located north of the pier and known as the "minigrid" where profile line spacing was ~25 m. Over time the survey techniques evolved; accuracy and data point coverage improved. The platforms used include: (1) A Sea Sled with a graduated mast which was pulled offshore by a boat and winched back to shore by means of a cable; (2) The Coastal Research Amphibious Buggy or CRAB, a 10-m tall motorized tripod which an operator drives from the beach through the surf zone to a depth of ~-9 m at ~1000m offshore. (3) A Lighter Amphibious Resupply Cargo V (LARC-V) vessel which is a 10-m long amphibious vessel capable of continuous data collection from the beach, through the surf zone and offshore. LARC-V surveys extend to a depth of ~-15 m at ~2000 m offshore. Survey instruments included a Motorola Miniranger, Automatic Survey Level, Zeiss Elta 2s Electronic Total Station, Geotronics Geodimeter 140T auto-tracking total station and most recently a Real-Time Kinematic Global Positioning System (RTK-GPS). Speed, accuracy and error sources depend on the survey system used. These data are part of a series of surveys since October 1979 which document the evolving beach topography and bathymetry surrounding the USACE Field Research Facility (FRF) and which provide a measure of the beach's response to coastal processes, including storms. Survey data are complemented by a suite of continuous observations of local waves, winds, tides and currents. These data are unique in their temporal coverage and vertical accuracy and have been the subject of multiple technical papers. For more information and technical details, please see the PDF embedded with the data files (or see further details reference).
    Keywords: CT; Field_Research_Facility; File content; File format; File name; File size; FRF; North Carolina; Underway cruise track measurements; Uniform resource locator/link to file
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 10 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: USACE / FRF has maintained wave buoys around the 17 m and/or 20 m depth contour since 1980. Over the years, we have used three different types of waverider buoys manufactured by Datawell B.V. (Haarlem, Netherlands). From 1980 until 1996, we used non-directional buoys, first the 0.7 m hull diameter design and then the 0.9 m hull diameter design. The buoys operate by recording the output of an accelerometer suspended in fluid and gimbaled (Hippy-40). For data prior to September 1986, data were recorded at 2 or 4 Hz and record lengths were either 34 or 17 minutes, respectively. Collection intervals were either three hours or six hours. From September 1986 to November 1996 data was collected hourly. Frequency spectra were computed using the Welch method with 50% overlapped ensembles [1]. From the end of 1996 onward, we have maintained 0.9 m hull diameter Directional Waverider MkII and MKIII buoys [2] that, in addition to vertical acceleration, also measure two orthogonal components of horizontal acceleration. From Feb 1997 to May 2005, time series were collected at 1.28 Hz and cross-spectral analysis was performed on shore [3, 4]. Between May 2005 and May 2013, directional Fourier coefficients computed on-board the buoy and transmitted onshore. Since May 2013, data analysis has been manged through the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP), UCSD San Diego, CA. Data are transmitted via an Iridium satellite link at half-hour intervals. Two dimensional (2D) frequency-direction spectra are computed using an Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator (IMLE) method [5]. For more information see FRF data paper, FRF website and data portal, and CDIP website. [1] Welch, P (1967) [2] de Vries, JJ (2014) [3] Longuet-Higgins, M.S., Cartwright, D.E. and Smith, N.D. (1963) [4] Earle, M.D., Steele, K.E. and Wang, D.W.C. (1999) [5] Oltman-Shay, J. and Guza, R.T. (1984)
    Keywords: coastal waves; CT; directional wave data; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; ocean waves; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave buoy; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 2.2 GBytes
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: By 1986, FRF scientists and technicians designed and built a novel wave sensor. A fixed, precisely-surveyed array of pressure gauges working in sync forming a wave antennae with a directional resolution well beyond that of buoys; details can be found in [1]. From 1986 - 1990, the array consisted of 10 elements parallel to the shore, referred to as the "linear array". The linear array resolved directional spectra but with 180 degree ambiguity. Although most of the wave energy propagates towards the coast, there is some fraction of reflected wave energy (not resolved). Please see the FRF data paper, FRF website, and FRF data portal for more information. [1] Long, C. E. and Oltman-Shay, J. M. (1991)
    Keywords: coastal waves; CT; directional waves; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; linear array; North Carolina; ocean waves; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave array; wave data; wave measurement; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 57.2 MBytes
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: Over time, wind data has been recorded at 10+ distinct wind stations often with multiple stations active simultaneously. The highest quality records were selected to be included into a conglomerate. From 1981-1987, station locations included a tower near the main building and the roof of the main building. In 1987, measurements were additionally made at the end of the pier and, in 1994, the pier became their exclusive location. At each station, wind speed and direction were measured by either Weather Measure Skyvane anemometers or RM Young (RMY) marine anemometers. Both were mechanical anemometers whereby the action of the wind turns an impeller. In the early era, there was a gauge preference based on location (e.g., the pier location was preferred over the roof). In the modern era of multiple wind stations at the end of the pier, an algorithm chose a preferred station. Wind stations, and their preference, are listed in the Scientific Data paper. Most recently, station 1 or 2 is given preference depending on wind direction (the upwind sensor is preferred). If data from the preferred station passes QC, it is included in the conglomerate. If not, the same process is applied down the chain of preference until a record passes (stations 5 and 8 were never used). Wind speed and direction were recorded a 1 or 2 Hz with various record lengths. There are 3 main eras of sampling. Sampling schemes varied until near continuous sampling began in 1992. All previous sampling schemes were reanalyzed into 10 minute segments for calculating statistics. Record remainders are kept if they are at least 6 minutes but forced to 10 minute time steps. Data is in a netCDF file with variables (units): time (seconds), latitude (deg. N), longitude (deg. W), sensorID, sensorElevation (m), windSpeed (m/s), windGust (m/s), windDirection (deg.), qcFlagSpeed, qcFlagDirection. time is unix epoch time, sensorID is digit code representing unique ID and sensor preference, sensorElevation is relative to NAVD88, windSpeed is 10 minute average, windGust is highest 5 second average, windDirection is coming from convention - clockwise from true North, qcFlagSpeed & qcFlagDirection are indications of data quality - 1 = passed, 3 = questionable, and 4 = fail. Please see the paper for full documentation.
    Keywords: CT; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; Underway cruise track measurements; wind; wind direction; wind gust; wind speed
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 26.9 MBytes
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Publication Date: 2023-01-30
    Description: USACE / FRF has maintained wave buoys around the 17 m and/or 20 m depth contour since 1980. Over the years, we have used three different types of waverider buoys manufactured by Datawell B.V. (Haarlem, Netherlands). From 1980 until 1996, we used non-directional buoys, first the 0.7 m hull diameter design and then the 0.9 m hull diameter design. The buoys operate by recording the output of an accelerometer suspended in fluid and gimbaled (Hippy-40). For data prior to September 1986, data were recorded at 2 or 4 Hz and record lengths were either 34 or 17 minutes, respectively. Collection intervals were either three hours or six hours. From September 1986 to November 1996 data was collected hourly. Frequency spectra were computed using the Welch method with 50% overlapped ensembles [1]. From the end of 1996 onward, we have maintained 0.9 m hull diameter Directional Waverider MkII and MKIII buoys [2] that, in addition to vertical acceleration, also measure two orthogonal components of horizontal acceleration. From Feb 1997 to May 2005, time series were collected at 1.28 Hz and cross-spectral analysis was performed on shore [3, 4]. Between May 2005 and May 2013, directional Fourier coefficients computed on-board the buoy and transmitted onshore. Since May 2013, data analysis has been manged through the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP), UCSD San Diego, CA. Data are transmitted via an Iridium satellite link at half-hour intervals. Two dimensional (2D) frequency-direction spectra are computed using an Iterative Maximum Likelihood Estimator (IMLE) method [5]. For more information see FRF data paper, FRF website and data portal, and CDIP website. [1] Welch, P (1967) [2] de Vries, JJ (2014) [3] Longuet-Higgins, M.S., Cartwright, D.E. and Smith, N.D. (1963) [4] Earle, M.D., Steele, K.E. and Wang, D.W.C. (1999) [5] Oltman-Shay, J. and Guza, R.T. (1984)
    Keywords: coastal waves; CT; Field_Research_Facility; FRF; North Carolina; ocean waves; significant wave height; Underway cruise track measurements; wave; wave buoy; wave spectra
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/x-netcdf, 9.5 MBytes
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2022-05-25
    Description: Author Posting. © American Geophysical Union, 2018. This article is posted here by permission of American Geophysical Union for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 123(12), (2018): 8674-8687, doi:10.1002/2018JC013766.
    Description: A large collaborative program has studied the coupled air‐ice‐ocean‐wave processes occurring in the Arctic during the autumn ice advance. The program included a field campaign in the western Arctic during the autumn of 2015, with in situ data collection and both aerial and satellite remote sensing. Many of the analyses have focused on using and improving forecast models. Summarizing and synthesizing the results from a series of separate papers, the overall view is of an Arctic shifting to a more seasonal system. The dramatic increase in open water extent and duration in the autumn means that large surface waves and significant surface heat fluxes are now common. When refreezing finally does occur, it is a highly variable process in space and time. Wind and wave events drive episodic advances and retreats of the ice edge, with associated variations in sea ice formation types (e.g., pancakes, nilas). This variability becomes imprinted on the winter ice cover, which in turn affects the melt season the following year.
    Description: This program was supported by the Office of Naval Research, Code 32, under Program Managers Scott Harper and Martin Jeffries. The crew of R/V Sikuliaq provide outstanding support in collecting the field data, and the US National Ice Center, German Aerospace Center (DLR), and European Space Agency facilitated the remote sensing collections and daily analysis products. RADARSAT‐2 Data and Products are from MacDonald, Dettwiler, and Associates Ltd., courtesy of the U.S. National Ice Center. Data, supporting information, and a cruise report can be found at http://www.apl.uw.edu/arcticseastate
    Keywords: Arctic ; waves ; autumn ; sea ice ; Beaufort ; flux
    Repository Name: Woods Hole Open Access Server
    Type: Article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Publication Date: 2020-10-20
    Description: Buoy observations from a 1999 Gulf of Mexico field program (GOM99) are used to investigate the relationships among friction velocity u*, wind speed U, and amount of swell present. A U–u*sea parameterization is developed for the case of pure wind sea (denoted by u*sea), which is linear in U over the range of available winds (2–16 m s−1). The curve shows no sign of an inflection point near 7–8 m s−1 as suggested in a 2012 paper by Andreas et al. on the basis of a transition from smooth to rough flow. When observations containing more than minimal swell energy are included, a different U–u* equation for U 〈 8 m s−1 is found, which would intersect the pure wind-sea curve about 7–8 m s−1. These two relationships yield a bilinear curve similar to Andreas et al. with an apparent inflection near 7–8 m s−1. The absence of the inflection in the GOM99 experiment pure wind-sea curve and the similarity of the GOM99 swell-dominated low wind speed to Andreas et al.’s low wind speed relationship suggest that the inflection may be due to the effect of swell and not a flow transition. Swell heights in the range of only 25–50 cm may be sufficient to impact stress at low wind speeds.
    Print ISSN: 0022-4928
    Electronic ISSN: 1520-0469
    Topics: Geography , Geosciences , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Publication Date: 2018-05-01
    Print ISSN: 2169-9275
    Electronic ISSN: 2169-9291
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...