ALBERT

Beschreibung: Improving outcomes in multiple myeloma will involve not only development of new therapies but also better use of existing treatments. We performed RNA sequencing on samples from newly diagnosed patients enrolled in the phase 2 PADIMAC (Bortezomib, Adriamycin, and Dexamethasone Therapy for Previously Untreated Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Impact of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Deferred ASCT) study. Using synthetic annealing and the large margin nearest neighbor algorithm, we developed and trained a 7-gene signature to predict treatment outcome. We tested the signature in independent cohorts treated with bortezomib- and lenalidomide-based therapies. The signature was capable of distinguishing which patients would respond better to which regimen. In the CoMMpass data set, patients who were treated correctly according to the signature had a better progression-free survival (median, 20.1 months vs not reached; hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.72; P = .0012) and overall survival (median, 30.7 months vs not reached; HR, 0.41; CI, 0.21-0.80; P = .0049) than those who were not. Indeed, the outcome for these correctly treated patients was noninferior to that for those treated with combined bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone, arguably the standard of care in the United States but not widely available elsewhere. The small size of the signature will facilitate clinical translation, thus enabling more targeted drug regimens to be delivered in myeloma.

Beschreibung: Introduction: Central nervous system (CNS) relapse of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents a major clinical challenge and is fatal in most patients. Recently Schmitz et al (J ClinOncol 2016), defined an effective risk model, the CNS-IPI, to identify those at highest risk of CNS relapse, based on the international prognostic index (IPI) score and presence of renal or adrenal involvement. For DLBCL patients receiving R-CHOP-like regimens +/- intrathecal methotrexate, the risk of CNS relapse for low, intermediate and high-risk patients was 1 extranodalsite and 27% had renal or adrenal involvement. Forty-one patients (43%) were intermediate risk (2-3 factors) and 55 (57%) were high risk (4-6 factors) for CNS relapse. 2-year CNS relapse rates were 0% for intermediate risk and 6.2% (2.0 - 18.1) for high risk patients (Figure 1). Of the 3 CNS relapses in high risk patients, 2 occurred concurrently with systemic relapse; there was only one episode of isolated CNS relapse. Of the 8 patients with CNS involvement at baseline, 2 (25%) developed CNS relapse, including 1 isolated CNS relapse. One further patient died of refractory DLBCL whilst 5 (62.5%) are alive and progression free with a minimum of 28 months follow-up. Conclusions: Inclusion of CNS-directed therapy intrinsic to the R-CODOX-M IVAC regimen resulted in very low rates of CNS relapse. Although patient numbers and low event rates make direct comparison difficult, results appear promising alongside historical results with R-CHOP chemotherapy. CNS relapse rates for both intermediate and high risk patients in this trial were below the 95% confidence intervals for CNS relapse reported in large training and validation cohorts by Schmitz et al (0% vs 2.2 - 4.4 and 2.3 - 5.5 for intermediate risk patients and 6.2% vs 6.3 - 14.1 and 7.9 - 16.1 for high risk). Of note, only 2 patients in the whole cohort progressed with isolated CNS disease, one of whom had CNS disease at diagnosis. Thus, where systemic disease was fully treated, treatment failure due to inadequate CNS penetration was rare. Reasonable outcomes were achieved in patients with CNS involvement at diagnosis but greater patient numbers are required to further evaluate this regimen in secondary CNS lymphoma. Table 1 PFS events and CNS relapse rates Table 1. PFS events and CNS relapse rates Figure 1 CNS relapse rates according to CNS-IPI and presence of CNS disease at baseline Figure 1. CNS relapse rates according to CNS-IPI and presence of CNS disease at baseline Disclosures Phillips: Roche: Consultancy. Patmore:Roche: Honoraria; Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Ardeshna:Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Conference Expenses, Research Funding. Montoto:Roche: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding.

Beschreibung: B-other ALL represents a working definition for patients with B cell precursor (BCP) ALL without a known primary chromosomal abnormality. In this study we use whole genome sequencing (WGS) to characterize adult B-other cases (age ≥ 25yrs) from the UKALL14 trial (NCT01085617). Of 652 patients aged 25-65yrs enrolled onto UKALL14, 333 (51%) had B-other ALL. Sufficient material was available to screen 156/333 B-other cases for recurrent Ph-like fusion events (CLRF2, JAK2, ABL1, ABL2PDGFRB) using FISH and MLPA (kit P335). This identified 28 (18%) Ph-like fusion events (21 CRLF2, 5 ABL-class fusions and 2 JAK). Of the remaining 128 B-other cases 57 had available samples for tumor normal paired WGS (read depth 60x and 30x respectively). Bioinformatic analysis was performed to determine small somatic mutations (SSMs); single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (INDELs) as well as copy number aberrations (CNA) and structural variants (SV). We also undertook de novo motif analysis to identify RAG mediated deletions. We present data for 30/57 cases (median age of diagnosis 44, range 25-65), the remainder are undergoing sequencing. Within this cohort we identified 784 SVs, 49,244 SNVs and 2,881 INDELs, with each case having a median representation of 23 SVs, 1,674 SNVs and 86 INDELs. The Median SSM burden was 0.55 per megabase (range 0.31-0.81), which is in the upper third of previous ALL estimates (median 0.26 range 0.03-2.9) but low compared to most other cancer types (Alexandrov et al. 2013 Nature). Fusion gene analysis identified 11/30 (37%) cases with recurrent rearrangements (2 ZNF384r, 2 PAX5r, 5 DUX4r and FGFR1r); this identified a novel 5' partner for ZNF384r (AKAP8) and MYO18A-FGFR1 a fusion previously seen in a single case of 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome. A further 7 clonal coding drivers were identified, 3 PAX5alt, 3 Ph-like candidates and a single ETV6-RUNX1-like candidate (ETV6 R399C, a dominant negative mutation). We classified our cohort into 6 driver subgroups as shown in table 1 using Gu et al. as a framework (Gu et al. 2019 Nat Gen). We found no evidence of driver subgroups clustering with age, although the Ph-like candidates were all identified in patients 39yrs or older. There was evidence that known driver subgroups have differing mutation burdens but these were not significant in this preliminary cohort; the single MEF2Dr case had a high SV burden compared to all other known subgroups (137 vs. cohort median 22); Favorable outcome subgroups (ZNF384r and DUX4r n=7) had a lower SNV coding mutation burden (median 14 vs. 20; U = 60, p = 0.057; Mann-Whitney U test); PAX5alt (n=5) cases had a higher INDEL burden (median 174 vs. 82; U = 16.5, p =0.057). As expected we found recurrent CNA in CDKN2A/B (63%; 19/30), PAX5 (33%; 10/30), IKZF1 (27%; 8/30), ETV6 (11%; 3/30) and BTG1 (7%; 2/30) across the cohort. IKZF1 deletions were enriched in the Ph-like candidate (n=4) subgroup compared to all other known groups (75% vs. 12%; p = 0.028; Fisher's Exact). RAG mediated deletions have been established as an oncogenic driver mechanism in childhood ALL, so we sought to ascertain its role in adults. We identified 54% (128/236) of the breakpoint resolved deletions had a RAG heptamer site. There was a significant difference (U = 167.5, p = 0.021) in RAG deletion burden between patients over 40yrs and under 40yrs at diagnosis (median 1.5 vs 3). Within the unknown driver subgroup; three cases carried ZEB2 H1038R mutations, two with concurrent IGH-CEBPA/B fusions, identifying them as likely belonging to the G12 cluster identified by Li et al. (Li et al. 2018 PNAS); one case had a high translocation burden (37 cohort median 2) and a single case had a high RAG deletion burden (45, cohort median 2); of the remaining 7 cases, four had either a NRAS or FLT3 subclonal hotspot mutation. Here we present the WGS analyses of 30 cases classified as B-other on the basis of no cytogenetic findings by standard clinical assays. The landscape of adult B-other ALL is highly heterogeneous but with WGS we were able to find at least one disease defining event in 60% of our cohort. These events often encompass novel fusion partners of established genomic subtypes or a cytogenetically cryptic lesion such as IGH-DUX4. Taken together our findings demonstrate the clinical utility of WGS as a diagnostic assay to inform and improve the management of adult B-other ALL patients in the future. Disclosures Fielding: Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Papaemmanuil:Celgene: Research Funding.

Beschreibung: Karl S Peggs and Sarah J Albon contributed equally to the work and are joint first author Introduction Alemtuzumab reduces the incidence of GVHD after unrelated donor stem cell transplant (MUD SCT) but delays immune reconstitution resulting in high morbidity/mortality from viral infections. Previous studies have suggested that adoptive transfer of allodepleted donor T cells (ADTs) improves immunity after SCT but this has never been tested in a randomised study. We developed a methodology for selective immunomagnetic depletion of alloreactive T-cells upregulating CD25 and CD71 after activation with host dendritic cells (DC) and showed that ADTs retain anti-viral responses with minimal host alloreactivity (Samarasinghe et al Blood 2010). We have now tested whether ADTs can safely be used to improve immune reconstitution after MUD SCT for haematological malignancies in a randomised Phase II multi-centre clinical study; ICAT (NCT01827579). Methods Patients undergoing Alemtuzumab-based peripheral blood SCT from a 9/10 or 10/10 MUD for haematological malignancy were randomised 2:1 to receive either the ATIMP (ADTs) or standard of care. Two weeks prior to SCT, patients randomised to ATIMP underwent a leucapheresis from which DCs were generated. Irradiated patient-derived DCs were then co-cultured with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from an unstimulated leucapheresis/500ml blood draw from the donor to activate alloreactive T cells. Four days later, the co-culture was depleted of CD25+ and CD71+ fractions by immunomagnetic depletion on the CliniMACs, sampled for residual alloreactivity and sterility, and cryopreserved. Patients randomised to the ATIMP were scheduled to receive 3 escalating doses of ADTs (0.1x106/Kg at day 30, 0.3x106/Kg at day 60 and 1x106/Kg at day 90 post-SCT) until either there was 〉grade 1 aGVHD or they had normal circulating T cells (〉700/µL). The primary end-point of the study was circulating CD3+ T cell count at 4 months post-SCT with one-sided 15% significance level. Acute/chronic GVHD were graded using the Seattle/NIH criteria respectively. Results Twenty one patients were treated, 13 on the ATIMP arm and 8 on the control arm. The median age was 53 years and 67% (14) were male. 12 were AML/Myelodysplasia, 5 NHL, 3 CLL/CML and 1 HL. The median follow-up time is 14 months. Five of 13 ATIMP patients received 1 dose of ADTs, 4/13 2 doses and 4/13 all 3 doses. The incidence of acute and chronic GVHD was comparable between the arms. Overall, 7/13 ATIMP patients developed significant (〉Grade 2) acute GVHD compared to 4/8 of the control arm (p〉0.99). 3/13 patients in the ATIMP arm and 2/8 patients in the control arm developed severe aGVHD (all Grade 3). Three of 13 ATIMP cohort patients developed chronic GVHD (1 mild, 1 moderate, 1 severe), compared to 3/8 (all mild) in the control cohort. At 4 months, the circulating CD3+ T cell count mean was 730/µL (range 10-4080) in the ATIMP group and 212.5/µL (range 10-500) in the control group (1-sided p=0.11). However, the data was not normally distributed (Wilcoxon 1-sided p=0.18). Three ATIMP patients had high CD3+ T cell count at 4 months (〉1000/µL). At 6 months, the mean circulating CD3+ T cell count was 833.6/µL (range 20-2690) and 327.5/µL (range 10-860). At month 4, the mean PHA stimulation index in the ATIMP arm was 16.8 (range 0.67- 73.1) vs 3.8 (range 1.1-8.2) in the control group. At 4 and 6 months post-SCT, spectratyping analysis showed no evidence of a difference in Vβ diversity between the 2 arms in both CD4+ and CD8+ cells. The 1-year survival rate in the ATIMP cohort is 92% vs 88% in the control, and 1-year disease free survival rate 67% in the ATIMP cohort vs 70% in the control. Conclusions These data suggest that adoptive transfer of ADTs improves T cell reconstitution in some patients after MUD SCT and that the GVHD rates were similar between ATIMP and control groups. Figure 1: Kinetics of T cell recovery after transplant in ATIMP (blue) and Control (red) patients. Mean +/- SEM shown. Figure 1 Disclosures Peggs: Gilead: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghorashian:UCLB: Patents & Royalties: UCLB; Celgene: Honoraria; novartis: Honoraria. Amrolia:UCLB: Patents & Royalties.

Beschreibung: Introduction Earlier studies have indicated that the combination of bortezomib and rituximab is highly active in Waldenstrőm's macroglobulinemia (WM). However, there is scope to improve the complete response rate, duration of response and toxicity profile. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the addition of cyclophosphamide to bortezomib and rituximab in previously untreated patients with WM. Methods Symptomatic treatment-naïve patients were enrolled into this prospective randomised (2:1), multicentre, non-comparative Phase II study (NCT01592981). Patients were stratified according to the International Prognostic Scoring System for WM. Patients were treated with BCR (Bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2 s.c. days 1, 8, 15; Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 oral days 1, 8, 15; Rituximab 375mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 8, 15, 22 cycles 2 and 5 only) or FCR (Fludarabine 40mg/m2 oral days 1-3; Cyclophosphamide 250 mg/m2 oral days 1-3; Rituximab 375mg/m2i.v. days 1, 8, 15, 22 cycles 2 and 5 only) for 6 cycles repeated every 28 days. Rituximab and bortezomib were provided free of charge by Roche and Janssen, respectively. The primary endpoint was investigator assessed overall response rate (ORR) using consensus criteria. Results Sixty patients were enrolled into this study and 59 received trial treatment (BCR=42, FCR=17). Of all registered patients, 73% were male, median (range) age was 67 years (43-87), Haemoglobin 9.8 g/dL (6.5-14.0), serum IgM paraprotein 34 g/L (3.2-80.2), plasma viscosity 3.6 mPa.s (2.0-9.3) and 25/30/45% were low/intermediate/high risk respectively. Six cycles were completed by 92.9% of BCR and 76.5% of FCR patients, one patient withdrew from the study prior to starting trial treatment. Dose reductions were needed in 38.1% of BCR and 52.9% of FCR patients and treatment delays occurred in 64.3% of BCR and 64.7% of FCR patients. ORR was 97.6% in BCR patients with 78.6% achieving a major response (CR=1, VGPR=8, PR=24, MR=7, SD=1), one patient was not assessed as no evidence of WM was found upon central review; 82.4% in FCR patients with a major response rate of 76.5% (CR=0, VGPR=3, PR=10, MR=1, SD=2), one patient stopped treatment after cycle 1 due to continuing cytopenia (grade 4). Responses were also evaluated in both marrow and peripheral blood using a disease specific multiparamater flow cytometric assay. After a median follow-up of 18 months, 54 patients were progression-free; 3 patients progressed (all BCR) and 3 patients died, 2 from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (both FCR) and 1 from pneumonia (BCR). Grade 3 or higher toxicities included anemia (5 [11.9%] BCR; 3 [17.6%] FCR), neutropenia (11 [26.2%] BCR; 12 [70.6%] FCR), thrombocytopenia (7 [16.7%] BCR; 6 [35.3%] FCR) and infection (2 [4.8%] BCR; 5 [29.4%] FCR). No grade 3 or higher neuropathy was reported. Conclusions BCR and FCR are both highly effective treatments for primary therapy of WM but FCR is associated with increased toxicity and concerning incidence of secondary MDS. BCR warrants further investigation in a randomised Phase III trial. Continued follow-up of R2W patients is also important to provide reliable estimates for duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival. Disclosures Auer: Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Drug provided for clinical trial; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Owen:Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy.

Beschreibung: Introduction Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) relapsing after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) have a dismal prognosis. Recent clinical trials with T cells engineered to express 2nd generation CD19 chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) incorporating co-stimulatory domains for improved persistence and expansion report unprecedented anti-leukemic responses. However, responses are associated with Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) due to supra-physiological activation of the redirected T-cells. As an alternative, we studied use of donor-derived Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-specific T cells (CTL) transduced with a 1st generation CD19CAR as effectors, relying on signalling through the endogenous T cell receptor (TCR) to drive more physiological proliferation and persistence. This has enabled us to investigate a novel strategy to facilitate the expansion/persistence of CD19CAR T cells by vaccination with irradiated donor-derived, EBV transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCL). We are conducting a European multi-centre phase I/II study of this approach in patients with pediatric ALL relapsing after SCT and report our interim findings. Methods Donor-derived EBV-specific CTL were generated from 80mls donor blood by repetitive stimulation with LCL, followed by transduction with an SFG retroviral vector encoding a CD19CAR consisting of the FMC63 single chain Fv linked to a CD3ζ endodomain. Patients were eligible for CD19CAR CTL therapy either pre-emptively if they became MRD-positive (〉 5 x 10-4 in BM) within the 1st year post-SCT or prophylactically at day 60-70 post-2nd SCT. All patients had early withdrawal of immunosuppression and received lymphodepletion with fludarabine 90 mg/m2. Patients with detectable residual disease also received cytoreduction with vincristine/dexamethasone prior to infusion of cryopreserved CD19CAR CTL. Persistence of CAR CTL was measured by quantitative PCR and flow cytometry of blood. Disease status was assessed by morphology and IgH MRD analysis on bone marrow samples. The study design incorporated an interim analysis, allowing for vaccination with irradiated LCL if CD19CAR CTL were not detectable in 50% of patients at 2 months post-infusion. Results So far, 20 patients have been recruited (14 pre-emptive, 6 prophylactic arm) and 7 patients treated (3 pre-emptive, 4 prophylactic). The infused cell dose was 2 x 108/m2 in 6 patients and 4 x 107/m2 in the other. CD19CAR expression varied from 12.1-58.9%. No grade 3-5 toxicity was noted. In particular, no CRS, neurotoxicity or graft versus host disease (GVHD) attributable to CD19CAR CTL was seen. B-cell depletion was transient, lasting 1-2 months. In terms of disease response, 2 patients treated prophylactically remain in MRD negative remission after 3 and 17 months’ follow-up. A further patient showed transient clearance of BM MRD following immunotherapy in association with EBV viremia. He subsequently relapsed but has stable disease after retreatment with CD19CAR CTL with LCL vaccination. The other 4 patients had disease progression between 2 weeks and 3 months post-CD19CAR CTL infusion. At a median follow-up of 8 months, 2 patients have died of relapse, 3 are alive with disease and 2 remain disease-free. A planned interim analysis of the initial 6 patients treated with CD19CAR CTL alone showed poor expansion/persistence of CD19CAR CTL which were only detectable in the blood in 1 patient up to 28 days post-infusion. This may reflect that only 1 patient had EBV viremia at the time CD19CAR CTL were infused. In view of this, a second trial cohort received subcutaneous vaccination with irradiated, donor-derived LCL at 2 days before and at 1 and 2 months following CD19CAR CTL infusion to provide signalling through the endogenous EBV-specific TCR. So far, 2 patients have been vaccinated and a 3rd is planned shortly. Data on the effect of vaccination on CD19CAR CTL expansion/persistence will be presented. Conclusions This ongoing study shows safety of adoptive immunotherapy with donor EBV CTL transduced with a 1st generation CD19CAR in paediatric patients with ALL relapsing post allo-SCT. However, in the absence of a co-stimulatory domain in vivo expansion and persistence of transferred CTL is poor. We are investigating whether vaccination with irradiated, donor-derived EBV LCL improves persistence and efficacy of CAR transduced T cells and initial data on this approach will be presented Disclosures Pule: Cellectis: Martin Pule's laboratory receives funding for contract research from Cellectis Therapeutics Other.

Beschreibung: UKALL14 (NCT01085617) randomised 655 patients aged 25-65 years with B-precursor ALL, irrespective of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) status or cell surface CD20 expression to determine if the addition of four doses of rituximab to standard induction chemotherapy (SOC+R) resulted in improved event free survival (EFS). Patients were recruited between Dec 2010 - Jul 2017 and the primary analysis population comprises 577 patients recruited after an April 2012 amendment in which the SOC therapy was altered. The trial was powered with an 84% chance to detect a 12% improvement in EFS (Hazard ratio (HR): 0.71). Secondary endpoints included complete remission (CR), OS, non-relapse mortality, levels of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction and relationship of response to CD20 expression. SOC consisted of daunorubicin 30mg/m2, vincristine 1.4mg/m2, dexamethasone 4 day blocks of 10mg/m2 starting d1, 8, 15 and 22. Pegylated asparaginase 1000IU/m2 was added on d4 and 18 (d18 only if 〉40 years) for Ph- ALL and continuous daily imatinib 600mg for Ph+ ALL. Intrathecal MTX was given on d14. Rituximab 375mg/m2 was given on d3,10,17 and 24. Two patients did not start trial treatment, both were in the SOC+R arm. Analysis is by intention-to-treat. There were 288 patients in the SOC arm and 289 in the SOC+R arm, 273 (95.5%) of whom received all 4 doses of rituximab. The arms were well-balanced for risk characteristics. Of note, 63.9% (SOC) and 62.6% (SOC+R) were aged over 40 years at randomisation and 86 patients in each arm (29.9% and 29.8%, respectively) had Ph+ ALL. CR rate, 92.7% SOC and 94.8% SOC+R, did not differ between the arms. There was no difference in the MRD response between the arms, whether assessed as positive vs. negative or as a continuous variable; 121 (42.2%) of patients were MRD negative at induction completion in the SOC arm vs. 120 (41.8%) in the SOC+R arm. Likewise, the rate of severe/adverse events and non-relapse mortality did not differ between arms. At a median follow-up of 50.5 months (7 days - 83.6 months), 3 year EFS for SOC is 41.9% (95% CI: 35.8 - 48.0) versus SOC+R 48.7% (42.4 - 54.8), Hazard Ratio(HR) 0.88 (0.71 - 1.11), p=0.28, see figure1a. Pre-planned subgroup analyses by cytogenetic ("high risk" was defined as t(9;22), t(4;11), low hypodiploidy/near triploidy and complex karyotype) and other risk groups (age, presenting WBC) as well as by cell surface CD20 expression did not reveal any significant interactions. However, we did find that % blasts expressing CD20 was an independent poor prognostic factor; Youden's cut-off, to determine the best cut-off for a continuous variable, suggested a % CD20 expression of 11.7% as the optimal cut-off. EFS HR for 10-20% CD20 was 1.74 (0.98-3.10) and 〉20% was 2.20 (1.27 - 3.81), compared to

Beschreibung: Chromosomal abnormalities are established prognostic markers in adult ALL. Analysis of the UKALLXII/ECOG2993 trial (Blood, 2007;109:3189) revealed that patients (15-65 years) with BCR-ABL1, KMT2A-AFF1, low hypodiploidy (HoL) or a complex karyotype (CK) had a significantly inferior outcome in multivariable analysis. In UKALL14 (ISRCTN 66541317), all patients (25-65 years) with these genetic abnormalities were stratified to the high-risk arm to receive allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT), where possible, or an unrelated transplant. Patients with BCR-ABL1 received imatinib. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency and outcome of patients with high-risk chromosomal abnormalities and identify new high-risk genetic abnormalities by screening for novel gene rearrangements and copy number alterations. All genetic screening was performed using diagnostic marrow samples and by cytogenetics, FISH and MLPA. Survival endpoints were defined according to the trial protocol and analysed using standard statistical methods. After a median follow-up time of 3.4 years the 3 year survival rates for the whole B-cell precursor ALL cohort were: overall survival (OS) 52% (95% 48-56), event-free survival (EFS), 45% (41-49), relapse rate (RR) 34% (30-39). Among 653 patients, 319 (49%) harboured high-risk primary chromosomal abnormalities: BCR-ABL1 (197/635, 31%), KMT2A-AFF1 (49/616, 8%), HoL (49/525, 9%), and CK (21/512, 5%). The OS of patients with CK and HoL was 24% (95% CI 9-43) & 19% (9-33) which was driven by high RR: 60% (36-85) & 56% (39-75), respectively, despite alloSCT in first remission. This outcome was not obviously improved compared to UKALLXII (28% and 22%); however, the patient population was older. Patients with KMT2A-AFF1 fusion had OS and RR similar to the small number of patients (n=9) with other KMT2A fusions: 44% (29-58) & 49% (34-65) v 42% (11-71) & 56% (22-93). The outcome of BCR-ABL1 positive patients was not different from the remaining BCP-ALL patients (hazard ratios 0.92 (0.72-1.18), p=0.5 & 0.93 (0.67-1.29), p=0.7). Additional primary chromosomal abnormalities were detected as follows: ABL-class fusions (ABL1, ABL2, PDGFRB, CSF1R) (n=6, 1.3%), JAK-STAT abnormalities (P2RY8-CRLF2, IGH-CRLF2, JAK2 fusions) (n=34, 1.3%) and ZNF384 fusions (n=12, 3%). Patients with JAK-STAT abnormalities had high rates of MRD positivity post phase 2 induction (76%), high RR (62% (42-82)) and lower OS (35% (18-52)) despite 82% being stratified as high-risk. Three of the six patients with an ABL-class fusion have had an event - 2 early remission deaths and 1 relapse. In contrast, among the 12 patients with a ZNF384 fusion only 2 have relapsed (both after 3 years) and none have died. Secondary copy number alterations affecting key genes/regions were determined by MLPA in 437 samples. 270 (62%) samples harboured one or more deletion at the following frequencies: IKZF1 (n=169, 39%), CDKN2A/B (n=163, 37%), PAX5 (n=95, 22%), BTG1 (n=48, 11%), ETV6 (n=33, 8%), EBF1 (n=15, 3%), RB1 (n=31, 7%) and PAR1 (n=6, 1%). None of the individual deletions nor the number of deletions were associated with survival, either in the cohort overall or when stratified by BCR-ABL1 status. In particular, IKZF1 deletions had no impact on RR: hazard ratios = 1.04 (0.72-1.49), p=0.850 (Overall); 0.84 (0.45-1.56), p=0.584 (BCR-ABL1); 1.23 (0.51-2.98), p=0.645 (B-Other). In addition, neither of the two recently validated paediatric CNA profiles - UKALL (Blood Advances 2019, 3:148) and IKZF1plus (JCO, 2018, 36:1240) - showed a significant association with outcome in the whole cohort or any relevant subgroup, e.g. BCR-ABL1 or B-other ALL. Collectively these data indicate that primary chromosomal abnormalities remain stronger prognostic markers in adult ALL than the more recently identified secondary deletions. On the basis of these results, we propose an amendment to the genetic risk classification for adult ALL wherein groups with distinct outcomes (see figure) comprise: (1) very high risk: CK, HoL or JAK-STAT abnormalities; (2) high risk: all KMT2A fusions; (3) Tyrosine kinase sensitive: BCR-ABL1 and ABL-class fusions; (4) low risk ZNF384 fusions; (5) standard risk: all other patients. The integration of these primary genetic risk factors with other risk factor such as age, white cell count and MRD into an overall risk score is a key goal of our current work. Figure Disclosures Papaemmanuil: Celgene: Research Funding. Menne:Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kite/Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel grant, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. McMillan:BMS: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Sandoz: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rowntree:Novartis: Consultancy. Fielding:Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy.

Beschreibung: Introduction: Carfilzomib (20/36mg/m2) triplets with Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (KRd), or Cyclophosphamide-Dexamethasone (KCd) are safe and effective in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma(NDMM). The higher dose of 56mg/m2 is effective as a doublet with Dexamethasone in the relapsed setting, but there is limited data on this dose in triplet combinations in the frontline setting. Aim: The CARDAMON study evaluated KCd with bi-weekly carfilzomib (56mg/m2) as induction in NDMM patients, and the benefit of ASCT versus K56Cd consolidation followed by carfilzomib maintenance. Co-primary endpoints were major response (≥VGPR rate) to 4 induction cycles of K56Cd, and 2-year PFS for ASCT versus K56Cd consolidation. Here we report interim analysis of the first primary endpoint of ≥VGPR rate to K56Cd induction. Methods: Transplant eligible ND patients received 4 x 28d cycles of K56Cd (carfilzomib:20/56mg/m2, IV d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, cyclophosphamide 500mg orally d1, 8, 15 and dexamethasone 20mg d1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16). Responding patients with a successful stem cell harvest (PBSCH) were randomised to autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) or 4 more cycles of K56Cd as consolidation, followed by 18 months carfilzomib maintenance (K56 days 1, 8, 15) for both arms. Trial recruitment completed in July 2019. Response was assessed by IMWG criteria; all patients had MRD testing by multi-parameter flow cytometry (10-5) after PBSCH. Adverse risk genetics was any one of t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14,20) or del(17p). Results: 281 pts were registered between 06/2015 and 07/2019; we report outcomes for 252 patients who either completed induction or came off study before end of induction. Median age was 58yrs(33-74), 91% ECOG 0-1, 45.2% ISS I, 24.7% adverse risk (48.5% when including 1p/1q+). Best response at end of induction or after PBSCH (n=250) was: ≥VGPR 59.2%, ORR 87.6%. ≥VGPR rate in adverse risk patients was 53.4% vs 61.9% in standard risk(SR), (p=0.25), ORR was similar: adverse risk, 87.9% vs standard risk, 88.1%. Post-PBSCH, 24.1% of patients were MRD-negative (patients who were withdrawn due to insufficient induction response or toxicity and those with an inconclusive result were grouped with the MRD-positive). Of 19 patients in sCR/CR, 9 were MRD-negative(47.4%) while 40/110 (36.4%) of VGPR patients were MRD-negative. MRD-negative rates in adverse and standard risk patients were 22.8% and 24.7% respectively. 10 patients progressed during or at end of induction, and 12 were withdrawn for toxicity. There were 4 deaths during induction, one from myocardial infarction, the other 3 from cardiac arrest, associated with bronchopneumonia and sepsis. During induction, 114 serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported in 72/252 patients, notable ones were thrombotic microangiopathy (2), grade 3 cardiac ischaemia (4), infection (16.3%, mainly lung), renal impairment (6), G3 hypertension (3), thromboembolism(2). Specific guidance for hypertension management was incorporated. 25% of patients are currently reported to have received a dose modification during induction. Full details of adverse events and dose intensity will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: K56Cd is an effective induction regimen in NDMM patients, and has equivalent MRD negative rates in adverse and standard risk disease. The SAE profile is in keeping with published safety data with carfilzomib. Disclosures Yong: Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Autolus: Consultancy; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Popat:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: travel support to meetings; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: travel, accommodations, expenses. Ramasamy:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; NAPP Pharmaceuticals Ltd.: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag Ltd.: Research Funding; Oncopeptides and Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Chapman:Takeda: Honoraria. Benjamin:Allogene: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Servier: Research Funding; Eusapharm: Consultancy. Owen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel/ meeting support. OffLabel Disclosure: Carfilzomib is used with cyclophosphamide as 1st line treatment for myeloma

Beschreibung: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterised by recurrent chromosomal abnormalities and genomic microdeletions. Although the incidence of adult ALL increases with age, very few studies have specifically examined the genetic aberrations in adults aged ≥60 years. The objectives of the study were to define the frequency of recurrent chromosomal abnormalities and characterise the copy number profile of ALL in older adults. All patients from UKALL14 and UKALL60+ clinical trials aged ≥60 years at diagnosis of ALL were considered in the study. Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) results at diagnosis were used to classify patients in 1 of 5 genetic subgroups - BCR-ABL1, TCF3-PBX1, MLL/KMT2A rearranged (KMT2Ar), low hypodiploidy/near triploidy (HoTr) and high hyperdiploidy (HeH). T-ALL patients were considered separately. B-cell precursor (BCP) ALL patients lacking a primary chromosomal abnormality (B-other ALL - including normal, failed and complex karyotypes, and other non-recurrent chromosomal abnormalities), were selected for extended FISH screening to identify ABL-class fusions, JAK-STAT activating rearrangements and other primary translocations using dual colour break apart probes for ABL1, ABL2, PDGFRB/CSF1R, CRLF2, JAK2, IGH@, ZNF384 and MEF2D. Separately, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays were performed to identify copy number abnormalities (CNAs). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used to confirm CNAs in 9 specific genes/regions (EBF1, IKZF1, CDKN2A/B, JAK2, PAX5, ETV6, BTG1, RB1, and PAR1). 207 patients aged ≥60 years at diagnosis were identified from UKALL14 (n=91) and UKALL60+ (n=116). Median age was 64 years (range 60-83) and 50% were male. Cytogenetic data at diagnosis were available for 86% (n=178) of patients. Frequencies of individual genetic subgroups are shown in figure (A). Extended FISH screening of B-other ALL cases identified rearrangements in CRLF2 in 5% (8/146), ZNF384 in 2% (3/137) and MEF2D in 3 cases are shown in figure (B) (HeH and HoTr cases (n=10) excluded). Recurrent deletions were identified affecting IKZF1 in 52% (n=43), CDKN2A/B in 45% (n=37), PAX5 in 39% (n=32), RB1 in 22% (n=18), ETV6 in 21% (n=17), EBF1 in 19% (n=16), BTG1 in 12% (n=10), CD200/BTLA in 16% (n=13) and ATP10A in 13% (n=11). The frequency of individual deletions varied by genetic subtypes (Figure (C)). Recurrent novel and less-well described intragenic microdeletions were also seen in COL11A1 (n=11, 13%), MEF2C (n=8, 10%), MBNL1 (n=7, 8%), PTEN (n=6, 7%), NF1 (n=4, 5%), LEMD3 (n=5, 6%), and KDM6A (n=4, 5%). These deletions will need to be validated by a second technique. In this large cohort of older adults with ALL, we confirm that over a quarter of patients harbour BCR-ABL1. HoTr ALL is rare in younger patients but was the second most common specific chromosomal abnormality and good risk genetic subgroups were very uncommon. Additionally, we confirm the rarity of T-cell ALL in older adults (