ALBERT

Beschreibung: Highlights: • BDI, BIWQ, CEC, IDAP and SLA indices were strongly explained by sediment variables. • DES and SHE indices were explained by water and physical variables. • Isotope values at all sites indicated inorganic to organic impacts. • Microphytobenthos (MPB) δ15N values were significantly correlated to TDI, SPI and IDAP indices. • MPB δ15N values are strong indicators of nitrogen pollution across spatiotemporal gradients. Abstract: Rivers are impacted by pollutants from anthropogenic activities such as urbanisation and agricultural practices. Whilst point source pollution has been widely studied and in some cases remediated, non-point pollutant sources remain pervasive, particularly in developing countries that lack economic and human capacity. Monitoring of pollution levels in many regions is additionally challenged by a lack of robust indicators for nitrogen inputs, however, diatom community indices and analysis of variation in microphytobenthos (MBP) stable isotope analysis variations have potential. The present study investigates variations and utilities in benthic diatom indices and MPB δ15N along different river sections (n = 31) of an austral river between two seasons (wet and dry), testing for relationships with key environmental variables (physical, water and sediment), in the context of N monitoring. One hundred and eighteen diatom taxa belonging to 36 genera were identified, with physical (water flow), water (nitrate, P and total dissolved solids) and sediment (B, Ca, Cr, Na, N, P, SOM, Pb and Zn) variables correlating to one or more of the 12 diatom indices presented. In particular, Biological Diatom Index, Biological Index of Water Quality, Central Economic Community, Index of Artois-Picardie Diatom (IDAP) and Sládeček’s Index were strongly explained by sediment variables, whilst Descy’s Pollution Index and Schiefele and Schreiner’s Index were explained by water and physical variables. While MPB δ15N were within the “no impact” level in the wet and dry seasons at reference (i.e. unpolluted) sites, all sites located in agricultural or urban areas, and downstream of sewage discharges, had a wider range that encompassed increasing organic impacts (“inorganic impacts” to high “organic impacts”). Temperature and turbidity (negative), as well as dissolved oxygen, waterway width and depth (positive), significantly affected MPB δ15N, while effects of chemistry variables were less apparent. Overall, we found that MPB δ15N signatures were significantly correlated with Trophic Diatom Index, the Specific Pollution sensitivity Index and the Artois-Picardie Diatom Index, suggesting the utility of diatoms and MPB δ15N in assessments of aquatic pollution. In turn, MPB δ15N values are strong indicators of N pollution across spatial and seasonal gradients. Thus, the results showed the effects of sediment variables on diatoms to be strong, indicating that sediment rather than water characteristics more strongly structure diatom communities. Thus, sediments variables should be sampled when conducting bioassessment studies.