ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Other Sources  (4)
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2023-11-17
    Description: One important component of precipitating convection is the formation of convective downdrafts. They can terminate the initial updraft, affect the mean properties of the boundary layer, and cause strong winds at the surface. While the basic forcing mechanisms for downdrafts are well understood, it is difficult to formulate general relationships between updrafts, environmental conditions, and downdrafts. To better understand what controls different downdraft properties, we analyze downdrafts over tropical oceans in a global storm resolving simulation. Using a global model allows us to examine a large number of downdrafts under naturally varying environmental conditions. We analyze the various factors affecting downdrafts using three alternative methods. First, hierarchical clustering is used to examine the correlation between different downdraft, updraft, and environmental variables. Then, either random forests or multiple linear regression are used to estimate the relationships between downdraft properties and the updraft and environmental predictors. We find that these approaches yield similar results. Around 75% of the variability in downdraft mass flux and 37% of the variability in downdraft velocity are predictable. Analyzing the relative importance of our various predictors, we find that downdrafts are coupled to updrafts via the precipitation generation argument. In particular, updraft properties determine rain amount and rate, which then largely control the downdraft mass flux and, albeit to a lesser extent, the downdraft velocity. Among the environmental variables considered, only lapse rate is a valuable predictor: a more unstable environment favors a higher downdraft mass flux and a higher downdraft velocity.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: Once a cloud begins to rain, the air inside or below the cloud can gain negative buoyancy and sink to the ground. This downward movement of air is called a downdraft. Downdrafts can end the life cycle of a cloud and also result in strong, sometimes destructive, wind gusts at the surface. The basic driving forces for downdrafts are well understood. For example, we know that evaporation of rain and the associated latent cooling of air is usually critical in causing the air to become negatively buoyant. Even though the basic driving forces are known, many interrelated processes contribute simultaneously to the strength of the downdraft, making it difficult to predict the strength of a downdraft under specific conditions. In this study, we use an atmospheric simulation whose model domain spans the globe and can explicitly resolve rain clouds. Compared to previous studies, the use of a global domain allows us to study a very large number of rain clouds, and their associated downdrafts, which form under very different, naturally varying environmental conditions. Machine learning techniques and traditional statistical methods agree on the result that the strength of the downdraft can be well predicted if we know the strength of the updraft that caused the downdraft or, even better, if we know the amount of rain that an updraft produced. Surprisingly, we have found that downdrafts can be predicted only slightly better if we also know other environmental conditions of the air surrounding the downdraft, such as the temperature and/or humidity profiles.
    Description: Key Points: The best predictors of downdraft mass flux and velocity are rain amount and rate, respectively. Updraft properties impact downdraft properties through their control on rain formation. For a given rain amount and rate, environmental conditions add little skill to downdraft prediction.
    Description: Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
    Description: ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes
    Description: https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/modeling-with-icon/code-availability
    Description: http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0009-A854-B
    Keywords: ddc:551.6 ; convective downdrafts ; global storm resolving simulation ; machine learning ; random forest ; multiple linear regression
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2023-11-27
    Description: In sustainability governance, the reliance on deliberative participatory processes has greatly increased over the last decades due to expectations that such processes can mobilize additional creative potential, foster better understanding of problems and acceptance of the costs of relevant solutions, and mediate the decline in traditional forms of participation. However, in complex technological contexts such as bioeconomics and, especially, biotechnology, participatory processes are still rare, at least partly because of concerns that citizens might lack the necessary information and skills. Yet bioeconomic innovation trajectories often imply societal, political, and economic changes that also affect citizens’ lifestyles and budgets and may cohere or conflict with individual and collective norms. Thus, citizen participation in relevant deliberations and decisions would seem opportune. In this paper, we therefore inquire into the potential and challenges for participatory processes in bioeconomic contexts. Specifically, we identify pivotal criteria for the democratic quality of relevant participatory processes on the basis of the rich literature on citizen participation in sustainability governance. We then explore how (well) these criteria can be achieved in participatory processes on the bioeconomy and biotechnological innovation strategies, drawing on two such processes we carried out in 2021 and 2022. On this basis, we propose further questions and implications for research and practice.
    Description: Der Rückgriff auf deliberative, partizipative Prozesse hat in der Nachhaltigkeits-Governance in den letzten Jahrzehnten stark zugenommen, da erwartet wird, dass solche Prozesse ein zusätzliches kreatives Potenzial mobilisieren können, ein besseres Verständnis von Problemen sowie die Akzeptanz der Kosten entsprechender Lösungen fördern können und den Rückgang traditioneller Formen der Partizipation auffangen können. Gleichwohl sind partizipative Prozesse in komplexen technologischen Kontexten wie der Bioökonomie und besonders der Biotechnologie immer noch selten. Dies ist zumindest teilweise bedingt durch die Befürchtung, dass den Bürgerinnen und Bürgern die notwendigen Informationen und Fähigkeiten fehlen könnten. Wege hin zu bioökonomischen Innovationen implizieren jedoch oft sozialen, politischen und ökonomischen Wandel, der sich auf die Lebensstile und Lebenshaltungskosten von Bürgerinnen und Bürgern auswirken und mit individuellen sowie kollektiven Normen in Einklang stehen, aber auch in Konflikt geraten können. Die Beteiligung von Bürgerinnen und Bürgern an entsprechenden Deliberationen und Entscheidungen erscheint deshalb angebracht. In diesem Beitrag untersuchen wir daher das Potenzial und Herausforderungen partizipativer Prozesse in Kontexten der Bioökonomie. Genauer werden grundlegende Kriterien für die demokratische Qualität entsprechender partizipatorischer Prozesse auf der Grundlage der umfangreichen Literatur zu Bürgerbeteiligung in der Nachhaltigkeits-Governance identifiziert. Anschließend wird untersucht, wie (gut) diese Kriterien in partizipativen Prozessen zu Bioökonomie und biotechnologischen Innovationsstrategien umgesetzt werden können. Dabei stützen wir uns auf zwei solcher Prozesse, die wir in den Jahren 2021 und 2022 durchgeführt haben. Auf dieser Grundlage werden weiterführende Fragen und Implikationen für Forschung und Praxis vorgestellt.
    Language: English
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2024-02-22
    Description: With each new report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the urgency to address climate change seems to increase. As the pressure to act rises, debates are intensifying regarding whether democracies can move toward sustainability fast enough. In this introduction to the special issue, we argue that current debates about the democracy–sustainability nexus revolve around the question of who should decide. Much of the recent debate can be structured along three opposites: experts versus laypersons, less versus more participation, and state versus market/private actor solutions. The first distinction asks whether climate change necessitates a shift of decision-making powers to scientists and experts rather than politicians or citizens. In the second debate, those who favor more participation in environmental policymaking face those who demand less. For example, whereas some promote new forms of deliberative forums, others doubt that these can be effective. Finally, there is a debate on whether markets and private actor networks might provide more efficient and effective ways to deal with the climate crisis than state regulation. While these perspectives are highly diverse and even contradictory, they are united in the belief that standard procedures of liberal democracy are insufficient to achieve sustainability.
    Description: Mit jedem neuen Bericht des Weltklimarats wird deutlicher, dass der Handlungsbedarf angesichts des Klimawandels immer größer wird. Mit wachsendem Druck intensiviert sich die Debatte, ob Demokratien in der Lage sein werden, den Übergang zur Nachhaltigkeit schnell genug zu bewältigen. In dieser Einleitung des Special Issue argumentieren wir, dass sich die Debatten zur Verbindung von Demokratie und Nachhaltigkeit um die Frage drehen, wer entscheiden soll. Insbesondere drei Gegensatzpaare werden in den Debatten sichtbar: Expert*innen vs. Laien, weniger vs. mehr Partizipation sowie Marktlösungen/private Akteure vs. Regierungen und Regulierung. Die erste Debatte fragt, ob die Klimakrise es notwendig macht, Entscheidungsbefugnisse von der Politik und Bürger*innen auf Fachleute zu übertragen. In der zweiten Debatte stehen sich Befürworter*innen und Gegner*innen von mehr Partizipation durch Bürger*innen gegenüber. Während die einen sich für neue Beteiligungsformate wie Bürgerräte einsetzen, zweifeln die anderen an deren Effektivität. Schließlich gibt es eine dritte Debatte, in der gefragt wird, ob nicht Marktmechanismen und private Akteursnetzwerke besser als die Regulierung durch Regierungen in der Lage sind, den Klimawandel einzudämmen. Obwohl die Positionen in diesen Debatten nicht nur sehr unterschiedlich, sondern auch widersprüchlich sind, eint sie die Überzeugung, dass die Standardverfahren liberaler Demokratie unzureichend sind, Nachhaltigkeit zu erreichen.
    Language: English
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Format: application/pdf
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  Energieverantwortung : Beiträge zu ethischen Grundlagen und Zuständigkeiten in inter- und transdisziplinärer Perspektive | Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment
    Publication Date: 2024-02-26
    Description: Nachhaltigkeit ist als normative Grundlage politischer Entscheidungen zur Transformation des Energiesystems nicht mehr wegzudenken. Sämtliche wirtschaftlichen Prozesse beruhen auf der Extraktion (vor allem) nicht-erneuerbarer Ressourcen, deren energetischer Umwandlung und Nutzung in Produktionsprozessen (von Gütern bzw. für die Bereitstellung von Dienstleistungen) sowie der daraus resultierenden negativen Externalitäten als ökologische Kosten, z. B. die Belastung ökologischer Senken (Atmosphäre, Wälder, Meere, etc.).
    Language: German
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...