ISSN:
1573-1405
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Computer Science
Notes:
Abstract Line drawings provide an effective means of communication about the geometry of 3D objects. An understanding of how to duplicate the way humans interpret line drawings is extremely important in enabling man-machine communication with respect to images, diagrams, and spatial constructs. In particular, such an understanding could be used to provide the human with the capability to create a line-drawing sketch of a polyhedral object that the machine can automatically convert into the intended 3D model. A recently published paper (Marill 1991) presented a simple optimization procedure supposedly able to duplicate human judgment in recovering the 3D “wire frame” geometry of objects depicted in line drawings. Marill provided some impressive examples, but no theoretical justification for his approach. Here, we introduce our own work by first critically examining Marill's algorithm. We provide an explanation for why Marill's algorithm was able to perform as well as it did on the examples he presented, discuss its weaknesses, and show very simple examples where it fails. We then provide an algorithm that improves on Marill's results. In particular, we show that an effective objective function must favor both symmetry and planarity-Marill deals only with the symmetry issue. By modifying Marill's objective function to explicitly favor planar-faced solutions, and by using a more competent optimization technique, we were able to demonstrate significantly improved performance in all of the examples Marill provided and those additional ones we constructed ourselves. Finally, we examine some questions relevant to the implications of this work for understanding the human ability to interpret line drawings.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00129683
Permalink
