ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Articles  (1)
  • narcotic analgesics  (1)
  • Chemistry and Pharmacology  (1)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    European journal of clinical pharmacology 31 (1986), S. 267-276 
    ISSN: 1432-1041
    Keywords: analgesia ; nalbuphine ; patient-controlled treatment ; postoperative pain ; narcotic analgesics
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Summary Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA, intravenous self-application of narcotics) has been studied during the early postoperative period in 40 ASA I–III patients recovering from elective major and minor surgery (20 abdominal and 20 orthopaedic operations). Doses of 3.7 mg of the new agonist-antagonist opiod analgesic nalbuphine were available on demand, whenever the patients felt that pain relief was necessary, delivered by a microprocessor-controlled injection pump (On-Demand Analgesia Computer, ODAC) in response to use of a patient-controlled manual switch. The maximum dose/h was set at 28.2 mg, with a refractory time of 1 minute between successful demands. A continuous nalbuphine infusion (0.44 mg·h−1) was administered in addition in order to prevent obstruction of the catheter. The duration of the PCA period was 17.9 (0.4–28.0) h (median, range). During that time, 13.3 (1–45) demands per patient were recorded, resulting in median individual nalbuphine consumptions of 51.3 (8.1–1050.5) µg·kg−1·h−1. Self-administration was characterized by considerable intra- and interindividual variability. Following abdominal surgery significantly more nalbuphine was needed compared to orthopaedic patients, but it resulted in poorer pain relief. There were no statistically significant differences in drug requirements or pain scores between the sexes. Overall efficacy and patient acceptance proved to be good. When compared with previous conventional postoperative analgesia, the effectiveness of PCA was judged superior by about 57% of patients. Side effects (nausea, sweating) occured in about 10% of patients but were usually of minor intensity. No serious circulatory or respiratory problems were observed during the period of PCA. Patient-controlled analgesia is a promising technique for the treatment of acute pain and for clinical pain research.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...