ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Ihre E-Mail wurde erfolgreich gesendet. Bitte prüfen Sie Ihren Maileingang.

Leider ist ein Fehler beim E-Mail-Versand aufgetreten. Bitte versuchen Sie es erneut.

Vorgang fortführen?

Exportieren
Filter
  • algorithm scalability  (1)
Sammlung
Verlag/Herausgeber
Erscheinungszeitraum
  • 1
    Digitale Medien
    Digitale Medien
    Springer
    The journal of supercomputing 14 (1999), S. 257-280 
    ISSN: 1573-0484
    Schlagwort(e): algorithm scalability ; conjugate gradient squared ; modified conjugate gradient squared ; Intel Paragon ; IBM SP-2 ; MIMD ; synchronization
    Quelle: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Thema: Informatik
    Notizen: Abstract The conjugate gradient squared (CGS) algorithm is a Krylov subspace algorithm that can be used to obtain fast solutions for linear systems (Ax=b) with complex nonsymmetric, very large, and very sparse coefficient matrices (A). By considering electromagnetic scattering problems as examples, a study of the performance and scalability of this algorithm on two MIMD machines is presented. A modified CGS (MCGS) algorithm, where the synchronization overhead is effectively reduced by a factor of two, is proposed in this paper. This is achieved by changing the computation sequence in the CGS algorithm. Both experimental and theoretical analyses are performed to investigate the impact of this modification on the overall execution time. From the theoretical and experimental analysis it is found that CGS is faster than MCGS for smaller number of processors and MCGS outperforms CGS as the number of processors increases. Based on this observation, a set of algorithms approach is proposed, where either CGS or MGS is selected depending on the values of the dimension of the A matrix (N) and number of processors (P). The set approach provides an algorithm that is more scalable than either the CGS or MCGS algorithms. The experiments performed on a 128-processor mesh Intel Paragon and on a 16-processor IBM SP2 with multistage network indicate that MCGS is approximately 20% faster than CGS.
    Materialart: Digitale Medien
    Standort Signatur Erwartet Verfügbarkeit
    BibTip Andere fanden auch interessant ...
Schließen ⊗
Diese Webseite nutzt Cookies und das Analyse-Tool Matomo. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...