ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-0662
    Keywords: High altitude aircraft ; stratospheric ozone layer ; aerosol effect ; heterogeneous chemistry
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology , Geosciences
    Notes: Abstract The paper discusses the potential effects on the ozone layer of gases released by the engines of proposed high altitude supersonic aircraft. The major problem arises from the emissions of nitrogen oxides which have the potential to destroy significant quantities of ozone in the stratosphere. The magnitude of the perturbation is highly dependent on the cruise altitude of the aircraft. Furthermore, the depletion of ozone is substantially reduced when heterogeneous conversion of nitrogen oxides into nitric acid on sulfate aerosol particles is taken into account in the calculation. The sensitivity of the aerosol load on stratospheric ozone is investigated. First, the model indicates that the aerosol load induced by the SO2 released by aircraft is increased by about 10–20% above the background aerosols at mid-high latitude of the Northern Hemisphere at 15 km for the NASA emission scenario A (the NASA emission scenarios are explained in Tables I to III). This increase in aerosol has small effects on stratospheric ozone. Second, when the aerosol load is increased following a volcanic eruption similar to the eruption of El Chichon (Mexico, April 1982), the ozone column in spring increases by as much as 9% in response to the injection of NO x from the aircraft with the NASA emission scenario A. Finally, the modeled suggests that significant ozone depletion could result from the formation of additional polar stratospheric clouds produced by the injection of H2O and HNO3 by the aircraft engines.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2024-02-21
    Description: Emergent constraints on carbon cycle feedbacks in response to warming and increasing atmospheric CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 concentration have previously been identified in Earth system models participating in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) Phase 5. Here, we examine whether two of these emergent constraints also hold for CMIP6. The spread of the sensitivity of tropical land carbon uptake to tropical warming in an idealized simulation with a 1% per year increase of atmospheric CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 shows only a slight decrease in CMIP6 (−52 ± 35 GtC/K) compared to CMIP5 (−49 ± 40 GtC/K). For both model generations, the observed interannual variability in the growth rate of atmospheric CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 yields a consistent emergent constraint on the sensitivity of tropical land carbon uptake with a constrained range of −37 ± 14 GtC/K for the combined ensemble (i.e., a reduction of ∼30% in the best estimate and 60% in the uncertainty range relative to the multimodel mean of the combined ensemble). A further emergent constraint is based on a relationship between CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 fertilization and the historical increase in the CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 seasonal cycle amplitude in high latitudes. However, this emergent constraint is not evident in CMIP6. This is in part because the historical increase in the amplitude of the CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 seasonal cycle is more accurately simulated in CMIP6, such that the models are all now close to the observational constraint.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: The statistical model of so‐called emergent constraints help to better understand the sensitivity of Earth system processes in a changing climate. Here, we analyze the robustness of two previously found emergent constraints on carbon cycle feedbacks, using models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) of Phases 5 and 6. First the decrease of carbon storage in the tropics due to increasing near‐surface air temperatures, which is found to be robust on the choise of model ensemble. Giving a constraint estimate of −52 ± 35 GtC/K for CMIP6 models, being within the range of uncertainty for the previously estimated result for CMIP5. Second, the increase of carbon storage in high latitudes due to CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 fertilization effect, which is found to be not evident among CMIP6 models. This is in part because the historical increase in the amplitude of the CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 seasonal cycle is more accurately simulated in CMIP6, such that the models are all now close to the observational constraint.
    Description: Key Points: An emergent constraint on the sensitivity of tropical land carbon to global warming, originally derived from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), also holds for CMIP6. The combined CMIP5 + CMIP6 ensemble gives an emergent constraint on the sensitivity of tropical land carbon to global warming of −37 ± 14 GtC/K. An emergent constraint on the fertilization feedback due to rising CO〈sub〉2 〈/sub〉 levels, previously derived, is not evident in CMIP6.
    Description: Horizon 2020 Framework Programme http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010661
    Description: ERC
    Description: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6900341
    Description: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3387139
    Description: https://github.com/ESMValGroup
    Description: https://docs.esmvaltool.org/
    Keywords: ddc:551 ; carbon cycle ; emergent constraint ; CMIP5 ; CMIP6 ; fertilization effect ; temperature warming
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...