ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-4919
    Keywords: regenerating rat liver ; UsnRNAs ; UsnRNA profiles ; kinetics of UsnRNAs' labelling
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Partial hepatectomy (P.H.) induces a partially synchronized growth response of liver under normal regulation of growth. In this phase changes in cellular morphology, radial distribution pattern of cells and other biological as well as major biochemical changes are well documented [24]. Here, we have shown that the cellular content of UsnRNAs altered during this proliferative phase as well. The level of spliceosomal UsnRNAs (U1, U2, U4–U6) gradually decreased by 30–50% upto 48 hrs of P.H. followed by gradual increase to reach the normal level within one month of P.H. The U3 snRNA level on the other hand, was nearly equal to that in normal liver at 48 hrs of P.H. but in 24 and 72 hrs of P.H. its level was high (4 fold) in contrast to that in other UsnRNAs. Thus, it is clear from our data that the level of all the six UsnRNAs decreased during 48 hrs of P.H. compared to that after first 24 hrs. This has been correlated in the kinetics of UsnRNAs' synthesis (in terms of labelling) in isolated hepatocytes, where the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs increased 20–30% in 24 hrs regenerating hepatocytes (R.H.) followed by sharp decrease by 30–50% within next 24 hrs, compared to that in the normal hepatocytes. But from 72 hrs onwards in R.H. the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs again increased by 30–50% (compared to that in normal hepatocytes) followed by decrease of their labelling-rate to reach the normal level in R.H. within one month of P.H. Thus, it may be concluded that the changes in UsnRNAs' level during the proliferative phase of liver regeneration may be either due to the alteration in the rate of synthesis (in terms of labelling) or along with it differential turn over rate; this phenomenon may have some consequences with the regenerative process of liver.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-4919
    Keywords: regenerating rat liver ; UsnRNAs ; UsnRNA profiles ; kinetics of UsnRNAs' labelling
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Partial hepatectomy (P.H.) induces a partially synchronized growth response of liver under normal regulation of growth. In this phase changes in cellular morphology, radial distribution pattern of cells and other biological as well as major biochemical changes are well documented [24]. Here, we have shown that the cellular content of UsnRNAs altered during this proliferative phase as well. The level of spliceosomal UsnRNAs (U1, U2, U4–U6) gradually decreased by 30–50% upto 48 hrs of P.H. followed by gradual increase to reach the normal level within one month of P.H. the U3 snRNA level on the other hand, was nearly equal to that in normal liver at 48 hrs of P.H. but in 24 and 72 hrs of P.H. its level was high (4 fold) in contrast to that in other UsnRNAs. Thus, it is clear from our data that the level of all the six UsnRNAs decreased during 48 hrs of P.H. compared to that after first 24 hrs. This has been correlated in the kinetics of UsnRNAs' synthesis (in terms of labelling) in isolated hepatocytes, where the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs increased 20–30% in 24 hrs regenerating hepatocytes (R.H.) followed by sharp decrease by 30–50% within next 24 hrs, compared to that in the normal hepatocytes. But from 72 hrs onwards in R.H. the rate of labelling of all the six UsnRNAs again increased by 30–50% (compared to that in normal hepatocytes) followed by decrease of their labelling-rate to reach the normal level in R.H. within one month of P.H. Thus, it may be concluded that the changes in UsnRNAs' level during the proliferative phase of liver regeneration may be either due to the alteration in the rate of synthesis (in terms of labelling) or along with it differential turn over rate; this phenomenon may have some consequences with the regenerative process of liver.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    ISSN: 1573-4919
    Keywords: anthracyclines ; cycloheximide ; UsnRNAs ; biosynthesis and processing
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract In the present study, anthracycline antitumor antibiotics (e.g. adriamycin and nogalamycin), the potent RNA synthesis inhibitors and cycloheximide, the protein synthesis inhibitor, have been used to understand the events of biosynthesis and processing of major UsnRNAs (U1–U6). The anthracyclines inhibit the UsnRNAs biosynthesis (in terms of labelling) differentially in a dose dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of adriamycin and nogalamycin reached plateau at a concentration of 2.5 μg/106 cells/ml and 0.1 μg/106 cells/ml respectively and indicates that nogalamycin is more inhibitory than adriamycin. The inhibition of the UsnRNAs synthesis (in terms of labelling) became maximum within 30 min of incubation and remained unaltered even after 2 h. Thus, it shows that the anthracyclines preferentially inhibit the initiation of the UsnRNA genes' transcription as it has been seen in cases of other large RNAs' synthesis by some other laboratories. The higher inhibitory effect of the anthracyclines on the biosynthesis of U5 and U6 compared to other UsnRNAs indicates the presence of more binding sites on the U5 and U6 snRNA genes. In presence of the anthracyclines, there was high retention of cytoplasmic major pre-UsnRNAs/UsnRNAs which indicates that the elongation of the UsnRNA synthesis is probably impaired along with initiation; because for the proper processing of the pre-UsnRNAs, formation of the correct secondary structure of that pre-UsnRNA is necessary. Cycloheximide showed some differential effect on the pol 11 transcribed UsnRNAs (U1–U5) biosynthesis (in terms of labelling) however it has no effect on the pol III transcribed U6 snRNA. It implies that in the pol 11 transcribed UsnRNAs, some transacting labile factors, either activator or inhibitor, are involved. Whereas, the processing of the UsnRNAs (either pol II or pol III transcribed) was affected more or less in a similar fashion in presence of cycloheximide, indicating the involvement of some transacting labile factors in this event.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...