ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2011-11-11
    Description: Although much attention has been focused on explaining and describing the diversity of social grouping patterns among primates, less effort has been devoted to understanding the evolutionary history of social living. This is partly because social behaviours do not fossilize, making it difficult to infer changes over evolutionary time. However, primate social behaviour shows strong evidence for phylogenetic inertia, permitting the use of Bayesian comparative methods to infer changes in social behaviour through time, thereby allowing us to evaluate alternative models of social evolution. Here we present a model of primate social evolution, whereby sociality progresses from solitary foraging individuals directly to large multi-male/multi-female aggregations (approximately 52 million years (Myr) ago), with pair-living (approximately 16 Myr ago) or single-male harem systems (approximately 16 Myr ago) derivative from this second stage. This model fits the data significantly better than the two widely accepted alternatives (an unstructured model implied by the socioecological hypothesis or a model that allows linear stepwise changes in social complexity through time). We also find strong support for the co-evolution of social living with a change from nocturnal to diurnal activity patterns, but not with sex-biased dispersal. This supports suggestions that social living may arise because of increased predation risk associated with diurnal activity. Sociality based on loose aggregation is followed by a second shift to stable or bonded groups. This structuring facilitates the evolution of cooperative behaviours and may provide the scaffold for other distinctive anthropoid traits including coalition formation, cooperative resource defence and large brains.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Shultz, Susanne -- Opie, Christopher -- Atkinson, Quentin D -- England -- Nature. 2011 Nov 9;479(7372):219-22. doi: 10.1038/nature10601.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology, 64 Banbury Road, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6PN, UK. susanne.shultz@anthro.ox.ac.uk〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22071768" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
    Keywords: Animals ; Bayes Theorem ; *Biological Evolution ; Female ; Group Processes ; Male ; Markov Chains ; Models, Biological ; Monte Carlo Method ; Phylogeny ; Predatory Behavior ; Primates/anatomy & histology/*physiology ; Sex Factors ; *Social Behavior
    Print ISSN: 0028-0836
    Electronic ISSN: 1476-4687
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2016-04-05
    Description: Evidence for human sacrifice is found throughout the archaeological record of early civilizations, the ethnographic records of indigenous world cultures, and the texts of the most prolific contemporary religions. According to the social control hypothesis, human sacrifice legitimizes political authority and social class systems, functioning to stabilize such social stratification. Support for the social control hypothesis is largely limited to historical anecdotes of human sacrifice, where the causal claims have not been subject to rigorous quantitative cross-cultural tests. Here we test the social control hypothesis by applying Bayesian phylogenetic methods to a geographically and socially diverse sample of 93 traditional Austronesian cultures. We find strong support for models in which human sacrifice stabilizes social stratification once stratification has arisen, and promotes a shift to strictly inherited class systems. Whilst evolutionary theories of religion have focused on the functionality of prosocial and moral beliefs, our results reveal a darker link between religion and the evolution of modern hierarchical societies.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Watts, Joseph -- Sheehan, Oliver -- Atkinson, Quentin D -- Bulbulia, Joseph -- Gray, Russell D -- England -- Nature. 2016 Apr 14;532(7598):228-31. doi: 10.1038/nature17159. Epub 2016 Apr 4.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉School of Psychology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand. ; Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Jena 07743, Germany. ; School of Art History, Classics and Religious Studies, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6014, New Zealand. ; Research School of the Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra 2601, Australia. ; Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27042932" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
    Keywords: Bayes Theorem ; *Ceremonial Behavior ; *Cultural Evolution ; Humans ; Models, Theoretical ; Oceanic Ancestry Group/psychology ; Phylogeny ; Religion and Psychology ; *Social Class ; *Social Control, Formal
    Print ISSN: 0028-0836
    Electronic ISSN: 1476-4687
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...