ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 11 (1995), S. 35-40 
    ISSN: 1573-2614
    Keywords: Anesthesia: general, depth ; Arousal: attention, wakefulness ; Learning: awareness, consciousness ; Memory: amnesia, awareness ; Monitoring: anesthetic depth
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective. An important aspect of assessing anesthetic depth is determining whether a patient will remember events during surgery. We looked for a clinical sign that would indicate a patient's potential for memory formation during emergence from anesthesia. A clinical sign indicating memory potential could be a useful endpoint for measuring the performance of anesthetic depth monitors and for titrating administration of anesthetic agents.Methods. We evaluated patients' responses to commands to open the eyes, squeeze the hand four times, and count 20 numbers. These responses were correlated with results on recall, cued recall, and multiple-choice memory tests.Main Results. Patients did not have evidence of memory formation until they sustained wakefulness sufficiently long to complete at least four hand squeezes or count four numbers. Of 28 patients, 13 (46%) with this sustained wakeful response had memory. Of 22 patients, 0 (0%) had evidence of memory formation when they demonstrated a brief wakeful response, defined as being responsive to command but unable to complete more than one hand squeeze or count, or an intermediate response, defined as two or three hand squeezes or counts.Conclusions. We conclude that a brief wakeful response to command indicates that a patient is unlikely to form memories, while a sustained wakeful response indicates that a patient may form memories. Thus, a patient's wakeful response to command could be a useful indicator of potential for memory.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 11 (1995), S. 41-46 
    ISSN: 1573-2614
    Keywords: Anesthesia: general, depth ; Arousal: attention, wakefulness ; Learning: awareness, consciousness ; Memory: amnesia, awareness ; Monitoring: anesthetic depth
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Computer Science , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract Objective. In a previous study of patients emerging from anesthesia following surgery, we found that a brief wakeful response to command of an eye opening or single hand squeeze or count was not associated with memory formation, while the response of four hand squeezes or counts was associated with memory. We wanted to determine the anesthetic requirements for obtaining this brief wakeful response endpoint during surgery and to determine if memory occurred at this endpoint during surgical anesthesia.Methods. Six different combinations of isoflurane, 70% N2O, and fentanyl were administered to 326 patients undergoing pelvic laparoscopy. After insertion of the trocar, anesthesia was reduced while patients were given verbal commands, and they were observed for movement responses to surgery and to command. Patients were classified as either not arousing, arousing with a movement response to surgery, or arousing with a wakeful response to command. For the patients who aroused, we calculated the percentage of arousal responses that were wakeful responses to command. The effect of fentanyl dosage upon the percentage of arousal responses that were wakeful responses to command was determined by using a Mann-Whitney test to compare a group of patients receiving fentanyl 2 µg/kg or less, with a group receiving fentanyl 4 µg/kg. In a subset of 39 patients, the potential for memory formation was evaluated by presenting a target sound to 29 patients during a period of either no arousal, movement response to surgery, or wakeful response to command; for a control group of 10 patients, no target sound was presented. All 39 patients were tested for memory of the target sound; the results from each group receiving a target sound were compared with the results of the control group, using a Mann-Whitney test.Main Results. A total of 68 patients aroused with either a movement response or a wakeful response to command. Wakeful responses occurred with only 1 of 39 patients (3%) receiving fentanyl 2 µg/kg or less; but, wakeful responses occurred with 17 of 29 patients (59%) receiving fentanyl 4 µg/kg. The difference between the groups was significant atp=0.01. None of the 68 patients had recall of intraoperative events or unpleasant dreams. None of these patients who were in the multiple-choice memory subset recalled the target sound. There were no statistically significant differences on the multiple-choice memory test between the groups presented with the target sound and the control group. Patient anecdotes suggested that some patients may have had memory of the target sound; but, memory was no more likely in patients with a brief wakeful response to command than in those who responded with a movement to surgical stimulation or those who did not have an arousal response.Conclusions. A brief wakeful response to a command of opening the eyes or squeezing the hand was not associated with increased memory formation during surgery. A brief wakeful response to command was found during surgery when patients received fentanyl 4 µg/kg; but it was rarely found at fentanyl dosages of 2 µg/kg or less.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2019-07-10
    Description: Computational grids provide users with many possible places to execute their applications. We wish to help users select where to run their applications by providing predictions of the execution times of applications on space shared parallel computers and predictions of when scheduling systems for such parallel computers will start applications. Our predictions are based on instance based learning techniques and simulations of scheduling algorithms. We find that our execution time prediction techniques have an average error of 37 percent of the execution times for trace data recorded from SGI Origins at NASA Ames Research Center and that this error is 67 percent lower than the error of user estimates. We also find that the error when predicting how long applications will wait in scheduling queues is 95 percent of mean queue wait times when using our execution time predictions and this is 57 percent lower than if we use user execution time estimates.
    Keywords: Cybernetics, Artificial Intelligence and Robotics
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...