ALBERT

Description: The work to be described was performed at the NASA Langley UPWT (4-ft supersonic), test section #2, during 21-24 May 1996. The configuration being tested was the 1.675% Ref H controls model; test conditions were Ma = 2.40, Re = 3 million/ft. This was an exploration of a new technique, and it was not intended to provide definitive comparison of measured and computed skin friction results. It is, however, hoped that the experience gained will make such a rigorous comparison possible in the future.

Description: This paper presents results of a study which attempted to provide some understanding of the relationship between skin friction drag estimates produced by flat plate methods and those produced by Navier-Stokes computations. A brief introduction is followed by analysis, including a flat plate grid study, analysis of the wing flow, an analysis of the fuselage flow. Other results of interest are then presented, including turbulence model sensitivities, and brief analysis of other configurations.

Description: Computations have been performed on the baseline Reference H wing/body configuration, as well as the Wing 704 configuration, an optimized wing and fuselage combination derived from Ref. H through automated optimization. The parabolized Navier-Stokes solver UPS was employed with viscous terms in two directions in an effort to understand the source and level of potential viscous/inviscid interactions. The paper briefly describes the UPS code and the grids used to obtain the solutions before the discussion of results. Results of these computations indicate that viscous/inviscid interaction can contribute increments to both the pressure- and friction-related drag. Computations were performed for wind tunnel conditions-1.675% scale models at a Reynolds number of 4 million per foot. Turbulent flow results were obtained using the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic turbulence model and were compared with laminar flow results. The laminar flow fields were used to obtain upper bounds on potential interaction effects.

Description: Automatic Grid Generation Wish List Geometry handling, including CAD clean up and mesh generation, remains a major bottleneck in the application of CFD methods. There is a pressing need for greater automation in several aspects of the geometry preparation in order to reduce set up time and eliminate user intervention as much as possible. Starting from the CAD representation of a configuration, there may be holes or overlapping surfaces which require an intensive effort to establish cleanly abutting surface patches, and collections of many patches may need to be combined for more efficient use of the geometrical representation. Obtaining an accurate and suitable body conforming grid with an adequate distribution of points throughout the flow-field, for the flow conditions of interest, is often the most time consuming task for complex CFD applications. There is a need for a clean unambiguous definition of the CAD geometry. Ideally this would be carried out automatically by smart CAD clean up software. One could also define a standard piece-wise smooth surface representation suitable for use by computational methods and then create software to translate between the various CAD descriptions and the standard representation. Surface meshing remains a time consuming, user intensive procedure. There is a need for automated surface meshing, requiring only minimal user intervention to define the overall density of mesh points. The surface mesher should produce well shaped elements (triangles or quadrilaterals) whose size is determined initially according to the surface curvature with a minimum size for flat pieces, and later refined by the user in other regions if necessary. Present techniques for volume meshing all require some degree of user intervention. There is a need for fully automated and reliable volume mesh generation. In addition, it should be possible to create both surface and volume meshes that meet guaranteed measures of mesh quality (e.g. minimum and maximum angle, stretching ratios, etc.).