ALBERT

Notes: Abstract Observations on invertebrates living in or on Scyphomedusae are compiled from literature. 51 species of 28 genera are listed as hosts for different taxa (Actiniariae, Turbellaria, Trematoda, Cestoda, Nematoda, Crustacea, Echinodermata and Cephalopoda). The relation of these invertebrates to their hosts is discussed and characterized as parasitism, commensalism or symbiosis. Trematodes and cestodes may be regarded as true parasites, with medusae as intermediate hosts and fishes as final hosts. The feeding on detritus from the mouth-frills may be interpreted as a cleaning symbiosis. The accociations of the recently discovered deepsea medusaDeepstaria enigmatica with the giant isopodAnuropus sp. and the rhizostomeCatostylus ouwensi with the parasiticOuwensia catostyli (the taxonomic position of which is still unclear) are described and discussed in detail.

Notes: Abstract During the late summer and early fall, juvenile shore crabs (Carcinus maenas L.) occurred in high abundances in mussel clumps scattered on tidal flats of the Wadden Sea. Abundances were much lower on bare tidal flats without mussel clumps and decreased substantially from July to November, whereas numbers in mussel clumps remained high. Large crabs left the tidal flats in early fall, whereas juveniles undertook tidal migrations only in the late fall. In March very few shore crabs were found in the intertidal area. The size of juvenile shore crabs living between mussels did not increase significantly during fall. On the bare tidal flats surrounding the mussels, a size increase was observed. Mussel beds and mussel clumps serve as a spatial refuge for the early benthic phases of juvenile shore crabs. Between mussels they can hide effectively from their epibenthic predators. Juvenile shore crabs do not leave the intertidal area and the mussel habitats before their major predators have left the area. Mussel clumps scattered over the tidal flats may be a critical refuge for juvenile shore crabs settling on tidal flats. Intensified efforts in mussel culturing in the European Wadden Sea during recent decades may have caused an increased abundance of mussel clumps on tidal flats, thus enhancing habitat availability for some mussel-clump inhabitants.

Notes: Zusammenfassung N-Carbäthoxy-11-(3-monomethylamino-propyliden)-6, 11-dihydro-dibenzo[b, e]oxepin (III) und 11-(3-Dimethylaminopropyliden)-6, 11-dihydro-dibenzo [b, e]oxepin (II) isomerisieren bei längerer Einwirkung von HBr—Eisessig zu den 3-Arylindenderivaten V und VI. Strukturbeweis und Reaktionsmechanismus werden erläutert.

Notes: Abstract The isopod Sphaeroma terebrans Bate, 1866 burrows in aerial roots of the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle L. The burrows serve as shelter and as a reproductive habitat, and females are known to host their offspring in their burrows. I examined the reproductive biology of S. terebrans in the Indian River Lagoon, a shallow lagoon stretching for ∼200 km along the Atlantic coast of Florida, USA. Reproductive isopods were found throughout the year, but reproductive activity was highest in the fall and during late spring/early summer. During the latter periods, large numbers of subadults established their own burrows in aerial roots. The average numbers of S. terebrans per root were high during the fall, but decreased during the winter and reached lowest levels at the end of the summer. Females reached maturity at a larger size than males, but also grew to larger sizes than the males. The average size of females varied between 8 and 10 mm, the average size of males between 6.5 and 8.5 mm. The number of embryos female−1 was strongly correlated with female body length. No indication for embryo mortality during development was found. Parental females (i.e. with juveniles in their burrows) hosted on average between 5 and 20 juveniles in their burrows (range 1 to 59). Most juveniles found in female burrows were in the manca stage and 2 to 3 mm in body length. Juveniles did not increase in size while in the maternal burrow, and juveniles of similar sizes could also be found in their own burrows. Males did not participate in extended parental care, since most of them left the females after copulation. Many females that were born in the summer produced one brood in the fall and a second during winter/early spring. Females that were born in the fall produced one brood during spring/early summer, but then probably died. Extended parental care in S. terebrans is short compared to other peracarid crustaceans. It is concluded that this reproductive strategy in S. terebrans serves primarily to shelter small juveniles immediately after they emerge from the female body, when their exoskeleton is still hardening and their physiological capabilities are still developing. Thus, in S. terebrans, extended parental care probably aids to protect small juveniles from adverse physical conditions in their subtropical intertidal habitat.

Notes: Abstract  The population dynamics and reproductive biology of an ascidian- and a sponge-dwelling amphipod were examined. The two undescribed amphipod species, Leucothoe“ascidicola” and L.“spongicola”, are closely related to each other, and occur in ascidians and sponges, respectively, along the Florida Atlantic coast. L. “ascidicola” was abundant in solitary ascidians during fall 1997, disappeared during spring/early summer, and became abundant again in September 1998. During the time when L. “ascidicola” were absent from their hosts, a copepod became a frequent inhabitant of the ascidians but disappeared again when L.“ascidicola” returned to the ascidians in September 1998. The numbers of L.“spongicola” in sponges increased substantially during spring, when high reproductive activity was observed. Following this reproductive peak, both adult and juvenile amphipods apparently left the sponges, and during the summer amphipod numbers in the sponges were very low. Another small amphipod species, which often co-occurred with L.“spongicola”, showed less seasonal variation and was found in sponges throughout the whole study period. The percentage of ovigerous females per host unit was usually lower in the ascidian-dwelling than in the sponge-dwelling amphipods. In solitary ascidians, L.“ascidicola” amphipods usually occurred in groups of several adults, yet there never was more than one ovigerous female per ascidian. In contrast, several ovigerous L.“spongicola” females were found to cohabit in the same spongocoel. This suggests that intrasexual aggression may be stronger among reproductive amphipod females in the ascidians than in sponges. The size distributions of juvenile cohorts indicate that juvenile L.“ascidicola” remain for relatively long time periods in the parental ascidian, where they may reach sexual maturity. In contrast, in L.“spongicola”, only cohorts of very small juveniles could be identified, indicating that juveniles disperse shortly after emerging from the female's brood pouch. It is concluded that extended parental care is of very short duration or does not occur in the sponge-dwelling amphipod L. “spongicola”, possibly because fast-growing sponges with a highly branched spongocoel system do not allow long-lasting coexistence of parent-offspring groups. In contrast, the discrete character of the solitary ascidians may enhance the potential for exclusion of other species, resource monopolization by reproductive females, and furthermore for long-lasting extended parental care in the ascidian-dwelling amphipod. Groups of single parents together with cohorts of large juveniles are reported in the literature for amphipods and isopods from brachiopods, bivalves and ascidians, suggesting that these discrete biotic microhabitats may favor the evolution of extended parental care in peracarid crustaceans.

Notes: Abstract Leptocheirus pinguis (Stimpson, 1853) is a widely distributed, abundant, endobenthic amphipod that engages in extended parental care, i.e. females host their juveniles in their burrows for extended time periods. I examined reproduction and population biology of L. pinguis at mean low water (MLW) in muddy sediment in Lowes Cove, Maine, USA. Cores around individual burrows were taken monthly in 1994 and 1995, and four seasonal samples were taken at different tidal heights. During the major reproductive periods in spring/early summer and in the fall, females produced several consecutive broods and hosted growing offspring in their burrows. Juveniles remained in their mothers' burrows until they reached a length of 5 mm (approximately one-third adult size) or more. At the study site, the majority of amphipods in individual burrows were adult females. Following the main reproductive periods, subadult individuals were found in their own burrows, but densities did not increase following the reproductive period in spring/early summer 1994, probably because large numbers of L. pinguis emigrated via the water column between June and December. L. pinguis is an annual species. Many members of the cohort born in spring/early summer start reproducing in the fall, and survive until the following spring when they produce several broods. Members of the cohort born in the fall start reproducing the following spring and also produce several consecutive broods. Both the spring/early summer and fall cohorts die off after the major reproductive period in the following spring/early summer. High standing stocks of microphytobenthos occur in soft-bottoms at MLW, and I conclude that L. pinguis can engage in extended parental care there because its food is abundant year-round. The limited expandability and low stability of burrows in soft-bottoms at MLW do not permit long persistence of parent–offspring groups in L.␣pinguis.

Notes: Abstract The reproductive traits of a deposit-feeding amphipod that engages in extended parental care were examined. At the study site in Lowes Cove, Maine, USA, Casco bigelowi (Blake, 1929) occurred in highest densities in soft sediments just below mean low water (MLW). During most months, the sex ratio was ≃1. Many females hosted males in their burrows throughout the summer, but after fertilization of females in September, all adult males disappeared from the study area. In October almost 80% of the females were ovigerous, and in November about the same percentage was parental, i.e. caring for juveniles in their burrows. The females produced only one brood each in late fall which they accommodated in their burrows for 2 mo or longer. The average number of juveniles per female was ∼20 in November, and continuously decreased until January. Juveniles reached sizes 〉10 mm length in the maternal burrows. In early December the first juveniles were found in their own burrows, but major recruitment took place in late December and January. It is concluded that for C. bigelowi, the delay of recruitment into the winter months with low predation pressure and the large offspring size at this time are major advantages gained by extended parental care. C. bigelowi is host to the peritrich ciliate Cothurnia sp. on its gills, and during the summer months 〉70% of all amphipods had ciliates on their gills. Juveniles still living in their mother's burrows showed infestation rates similar to that of the parent; those of highly infested mothers were more heavily infested than those of “clean” mothers. Facilitated epibiont transmission during intimate and long-lasting (2␣mo) parent–offspring associations may be a consequence of extended parental care.

Notes: Abstract The suspension-feeding amphipod Dyopedos monacanthus (Metzger, 1875) is a common epibenthic amphipod that lives on self-constructed “mud whips” (built from filamentous algae, detritus and sediment particles) in estuaries of the northern North Atlantic Ocean. The population biology of D. monacanthus at a shallow subtidal site in the Damariscotta River Estuary (Maine, USA) was examined between July 1995 and July 1997. The resident population at the study site was dominated by adult females during most months of the year. High percentages of subadults were found in late summer/early fall. Often, between 10 and 20% of the adult females were paired with males, and the percentage of ovigerous females varied between 40 and 100%, indicating continuous reproduction. The percentage of parental females varied between 40 and 80% during most months, but dropped to levels below 20% during summer/early fall. The average size of amphipods on their own mud whips was ∼4 mm during the summer/early fall, after which it increased continuously to 〉7.0 mm in March or April, and then dropped again. In March and April, the average number of eggs and juveniles female−1 was ∼100 eggs and 55 juveniles, while during the summer/early fall the average number of eggs female−1 was 〈20 and that of juveniles female−1 was 〈10. Many juveniles grew to large sizes (〉1.4 mm) on their mothers' whips in winter/early spring but not in the summer/fall. The average number of amphipods at the study site was low in late summer/early fall (〈50 individuals m−2), increased steadily during the winter, and reached peak densities of 〉3000 individuals m−2 in April 1996 (〉1600 individuals m−2 in May 1997), after which densities decreased again. The decrease of the D.␣monacanthus population at the study site coincided with a strong increase of amphipods found pelagic in the water column. This behavioural shift occurred when temperatures increased and benthic predators became more abundant and active on shallow soft-bottoms, suggesting that D. monacanthus at the study site is strongly affected by predation. The effects are direct (by predation on amphipods) and indirect (by reducing duration of extended parental care and enhancing pelagic movements). Both extended parental care and pelagic movements are important behavioural traits of D.␣monacanthus (and other marine amphipods), and significantly affect its population dynamics.