ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Language
Number of Hits per Page
Default Sort Criterion
Default Sort Ordering
Size of Search History
Default Email Address
Default Export Format
Default Export Encoding
Facet list arrangement
Maximum number of values per filter
Auto Completion
Topics (search only within journals and journal articles that belong to one or more of the selected topics)
Feed Format
Maximum Number of Items per Feed
feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2015-03-19
    Description: In this paper, we demonstrate an active 3-D millimeter wave (mmW) imaging system used for characterization of the dielectric function of different plastic materials and liquid solutions. The method is based on reflection spectroscopy at frequencies between 75 and 110 GHz, denoted as W-band, and can be used to investigate homogeneous dielectric materials such as plastics or layered structures and liquid solutions. Precise measurement of their dielectric properties not only allows for characterization and classification of different fluids, but also for reliable detection and localization of small defects such as voids or delamination within multilayer structures built from plastic materials. The radio frequency (RF) signal generation is based on circuits that have been designed and fabricated at the Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Solid State Physics (IAF) using a 100 nm InGaAs mHEMT process (Tessmann et al., 2006; Weber et al., 2011).
    Print ISSN: 2194-8771
    Electronic ISSN: 2194-878X
    Topics: Electrical Engineering, Measurement and Control Technology
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2018-08-28
    Description: Managing environmental resources under conditions of climate change and extreme climate events remains among the most challenging research tasks in the field of sustainable development. A particular challenge in many regions such as East Africa is often the lack of sufficiently long-term and spatially representative observed climate data. To overcome this data challenge we used a combination of accessible data sources based on station data, earth observations by remote sensing, and regional climate models. The accuracy of the Africa Rainfall Climatology version 2.0 (ARC2), Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation (CHIRP), CHIRP with Station data (CHIRPS), Observational-Reanalysis Hybrid (ORH), and regional climate models (RCMs) are evaluated against station data obtained from the respective national weather services and international databases. We did so by performing a comparison in three ways: point to pixel, point to area grid cell average, and stations' average to area grid cell average over 21 regions of East Africa: 17 in Ethiopia, 2 in Kenya, and 2 in Tanzania. We found that the latter method provides better correlation and significantly reduces biases and errors. The correlations were analysed at daily, dekadal (10 days), and monthly resolution for rainfall and maximum and minimum temperature (Tmax and Tmin) covering the period of 1983–2005. At a daily timescale, CHIRPS, followed by ARC2 and CHIRP, is the best performing rainfall product compared to ORH, individual RCMs (I-RCM), and RCMs' mean (RCMs). CHIRPS captures the daily rainfall characteristics well, such as average daily rainfall, amount of wet periods, and total rainfall. Compared to CHIRPS, ARC2 showed higher underestimation of the total (−30 %) and daily (−14 %) rainfall. CHIRP, on the other hand, showed higher underestimation of the average daily rainfall (−53 %) and duration of dry periods (−29 %). Overall, the evaluation revealed that in terms of multiple statistical measures used on daily, dekadal, and monthly timescales, CHIRPS, CHIRP, and ARC2 are the best performing rainfall products, while ORH, I-RCM, and RCMs are the worst performing products. For Tmax and Tmin, ORH was identified as the most suitable product compared to I-RCM and RCMs. Our results indicate that CHIRPS (rainfall) and ORH (Tmax and Tmin), with higher spatial resolution, should be the preferential data sources to be used for climate change and hydrological studies in areas of East Africa where station data are not accessible.
    Print ISSN: 1027-5606
    Electronic ISSN: 1607-7938
    Topics: Geography , Geosciences
    Published by Copernicus on behalf of European Geosciences Union.
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2017-09-29
    Description: Managing environmental resources under conditions of climate change and extreme climate events remains among the most challenging research tasks in the field of sustainable development. A particular challenge in many regions such as East Africa is often the lack of sufficiently long-term and spatially representative observed climate data. To overcome this data challenge we used a combination of accessible data sources based on station data, earth observation by remote sensing, and regional climate models. The accuracy of the Africa Rainfall Climatology version 2 (ARC2), Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation (CHIRP), CHIRP with Station data (CHIRPS), Observational-Reanalysis hybrid (ORH), and Regional Climate Models (RCMs) are evaluated against station data obtained from the respective national weather services and international databases. We did so by relating point to pixel, point to area grid cell average, and stations average to area grid cell average over 21 regions of East Africa: 17 in Ethiopia, two in Kenya and two in Tanzania. We found that the latter method provides better correlation and significantly reduces biases and errors. The correlations were analyzed at daily, dekadal (10 days), and monthly resolution for rainfall and maximum and minimum temperature (T-max and T-min) covering the period of 1983–2005. At daily time scale, CHIRPS, followed by ARC2 and CHIRP are the best performing rainfall products compared to ORH, RCM, and RCMS. CHIRPS captures well the daily rainfall characteristics such as rainfall intensity, amount of wet days, and total rainfall. Compared to CHIRPS, ARC2 showed higher underestimation of the total rainfall (−30 %) and daily intensity (−14 %). CHIRP on the other hand, showed higher underestimation of the daily intensity (−53 %) and duration of dry days (−29 %). Overall, the evaluation revealed that in terms of multiple statistical measures used on daily, dekadal, and monthly time scale, CHIRPS, CHIRP, and ARC2 are the best performing rainfall products while ORH, individual RCM, and RCMs are the least performing products. For T-max and T-min, ORH was identified as the most suitable product compared to RCM and RCMs. Our results indicate that CHIRPS (rainfall) and ORH (T-max and T-min), with higher spatial resolution, should be the preferential data sources to be used for climate change and hydrological studies in areas where station data are not accessible.
    Print ISSN: 1812-2108
    Electronic ISSN: 1812-2116
    Topics: Geography , Geosciences
    Published by Copernicus on behalf of European Geosciences Union.
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...