ALBERT

Description: Background: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presenting with hyperleukocytosis have frequent complications and early mortality. Pulmonary, central nervous system, and cardiovascular complications are common. Attempts to improve outcomes in the 10% of AML patients arriving with hyperleukocytosis have included leukapheresis. No prospective randomized study has supported the use of leukapheresis, and retrospective reports have revealed persistently poor outcomes as well as emerging concerns of acquired coagulopathy and worsening hypoxemia after leukapheresis. While many centers use a leukapheresis protocol processing two blood volumes, Johns Hopkins protocol routinely processes three-five blood volumes. This study aimed to assess coagulopathy, hypoxemia, and mortality with large volume leukapheresis. Methods: 32 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with large volume leukapheresis for WBC depletion are included in this report. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and apheresis-related data were collected. Coagulopathy and hypoxemia-related metrics were evaluated within 6 hours before leukapheresis and within 6 hours of completion of leukapheresis. Descriptive and inferential statistics (chi square and Mann-Whitney U test) were used to compare pre and post-leukapheresis findings and assess clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-nine of 32 (93.8%) patients presented with symptomatic leukostasis (with pulmonary and/or CNS symptoms in 26/29). Median blood volume processed was 14.8 liters (range 4-23.4L). Mean platelet count decreased from 60x109/L to 37x109/L after leukapheresis (p

Description: Because of its potent immunosuppressive yet stem cell–sparing activity, high-dose cyclophosphamide was tested as sole prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). We treated 117 patients (median age, 50 years; range, 21-66 years) with advanced hematologic malignancies; 78 had human leukocyte antigen (HLA)–matched related donors and 39 had HLA-matched unrelated donors. All patients received conventional myeloablation with busulfan/cyclophosphamide (BuCy) and T cell–replete bone marrow followed by 50 mg/kg/d of cyclophosphamide on days 3 and 4 after transplantation. The incidences of acute grades II through IV and grades III through IV GVHD for all patients were 43% and 10%, respectively. The nonrelapse mortality at day 100 and 2 years after transplantation were 9% and 17%, respectively. The actuarial overall survival and event-free survivals at 2 years after transplantation were 55% and 39%, respectively, for all patients and 63% and 54%, respectively, for patients who underwent transplantation while in remission. With a median follow-up of 26.3 months among surviving patients, the cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD is 10%. These results suggest that high-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide is an effective single-agent prophylaxis of acute and chronic GVHD after BuCy conditioning and HLA-matched BMT (clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT00134017).

Description: Key Points Posttransplantation cyclophosphamide is effective as sole GVHD prophylaxis for myeloablative HLA-matched–related or –unrelated BMT. Despite low chronic GVHD with PTCy, relapse and survival are comparable with outcomes reported using other GVHD prophylactic approaches.

Description: Disease-free survival (DFS) is short in patients ≥ age 60 or with secondary AML, adverse cytogenetics, or leukostasis at presentation. In such patients, median CR duration is ≤ 8 mos and only 20% achieve 1 yr DFS. Historically, maintenance therapy with low doses of cytotoxic chemotherapy has not prolonged DFS. We tested the hypothesis that Tipifarnib (T) might be active as maintenance therapy for adults with poor-risk AML in first CR after induction and consolidation therapies. Oral T 400 mg bid for 2/3 wks was begun median 2.4 mos (range 1.0–4.1) after start of final consolidation cycle and given for up to 48 wks (16 cycles) to 36 adults with median age 63 (range 27–82), secondary AML 31%, adverse cytogenetics 47%, leukostasis 17%, ≥ 2 risk factors 40%. T was well-tolerated, with only 4 of 36 unable to complete 2 cycles because of constitutional symptoms (1 rash, 3 non-compliant). To date, 256 cycles have been administered (median 8 per pt, range 1–16), with hospitalization required during only 4 (1.5%) cycles (infection 3, bowel obstruction 1). Dose reductions for myelosuppression (400 mg bid to 300 mg bid) occurred in 17/32 (53%) by cycle 3, and 2 (6%) needed platelet transfusions. A total of 9 patients completed all planned 16 cycles of T with a median CR duration of 24 mos (range 15–36+). Five of the 9 remain in continuous CR (CCR) 19+-36+ mos, median 26+), compared with 4 who relapsed after CR of 15–24 mos (median 22). There are 8 additional pts in CCR and still receiving T (2–12 cycles) with CCR 4+-12+ mos. A total of 15 patients progressed while on T at median 6.5 mos CR (range 3.5–12). Median CR duration for all patients is 10+ mos (range 3.5–36+), with 88% ≥ 6 mos and 48% ≥ 12 mos. In 13 “comparable” poor-risk pts (age ≥ 60 46%, secondary AML 25%, adverse cytogenetics 46%, leukostasis 23%) who were eligible for but declined T, 4 are in unmaintained CCR at 14+-25+ mos, 9 have relapsed at median 7.5 mos (5–13 mos). Treatment with T did not have a negative impact on reinduction chemotherapy at relapse, as 6 of 9 patients achieved second CR. Administration of T in CR after induction and consolidation therapy has low toxicity and is associated with prolonged DFS in some adults with poor-risk AML. Phase 3 studies are warranted in this patient population.

Description: Tipifarnib (T) exhibits modest activity in elderly adults with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Based on preclinical synergy, a phase 1 trial of T plus etoposide (E) yielded 25% complete remission (CR). We selected 2 comparable dose levels for a randomized phase 2 trial in 84 adults (age range, 70-90 years; median, 76 years) who were not candidates for conventional chemotherapy. Arm A (T 600 mg twice a day × 14 days, E 100 mg days 1-3 and 8-10) and arm B (T 400 mg twice a day × 14 days, E 200 mg days 1-3 and 8-10) yielded similar CR, but arm B had greater toxicity. Total CR was 25%, day 30 death rate 7%. A 2-gene signature of high RASGRP1 and low aprataxin (APTX) expression previously predicted for T response. Assays using blasts from a subset of 40 patients treated with T plus E on this study showed that AMLs with a RASGRP1/APTX ratio of more than 5.2 had a 78% CR rate and negative predictive value 87%. This ratio did not correlate with outcome in 41 patients treated with conventional chemotherapies. The next T-based clinical trials will test the ability of the 2-gene signature to enrich for T responders prospectively. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00602771.

Description: Background: Loss of the long arm of chromosome (Ch) 5 or complete loss of Ch 5 is frequent in de novo MDS and AML. Epigenetic modifications of tumor suppressor genes, including aberrant DNA methylation, may play an important role in the progression of MDS and AML. Cell signaling is regulated by a-catenin, which forms a trimolecular complex with E-cadherin (ECAD) and b-catenin that links with actin-containing filaments of the cytoskeleton. Studies have reported reduced expression of a-catenin in MDS and AML patients with 5q deletion as compared to those without 5q deletion. Whether promoter methylation of the a-catenin gene is responsible for this decreased expression is controversial. To explore the potential role of a-catenin in the pathogenesis of AML transformation, we (a) determined the tumor specificity of methylation in AML and non- myeloid malignancies and (b) frequency of methylation in patients with −5/del(5q) MDS/AML and those with normal cytogenetics; (c) performed bioinformatics and experimental analysis of the a-catenin adhesion complex and local 5q31.1 genes to investigate mechanisms of epigenetic silencing; and (d) performed a detailed analysis of primary AML samples correlating promoter methylation, a-catenin expression, and chromatin conformation. Methods and Results: Using methylation sensitive PCR, we found that methylation of the a-catenin promoter gene was specific for myeloid malignancy. No methylation was observed in 19 acute lymphocytic leukemia cases, 20 chronic myelogenous leukemia cases, or in 99 primary gastric and esophageal samples where a-catenin has been implicated as a tumor suppressor gene. In those patients with AML and an associated 5q deletion the frequency was 31% (8/26) as compared to those without a 5q deletion with 13% (16/120). Bioinformatics analyses of the Valk et al., 2004 leukemia database provide supportive data for under expression of a-catenin in non-5/del (5q) AML cases. We quantitated a-catenin mRNA expression by Q-PCR in our cohort. Expression was lowest in AML patients with a-catenin methylation (n=9), but also in a subset of patients without promoter methylation (n=17), suggesting alternative mechanisms of inactivation. In contrast to AML, methylation of a-catenin was rare in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Although p15 was methylated in over 50% of these cases as a positive control, only 2/18 MDS cases with 5q deletion (11%) and 1/13 MDS cases with 5q intact (8%) were methylated at the a-catenin promoter. The three positive cases were RAEB-2 (1) or RAEB-t (2), suggesting that a-catenin methylation may be most important in promoting transformation from MDS to AML. To explain a potential lack of correlation of methylation with decreased a-catenin in MDS and AML, we investigated a-catenin chromatin in a myeloid stem cell progression model and in primary AML samples. We performed chromatin immunoprecipitation on the CTNNA1 promoter using two active chromatin histone marks, H3K9Ac and H3K4me2 and two inactive marks, H3K9me2 and H3K27me3. In cell lines and primary leukemia samples where a-catenin was highly expressed (N=4), activation marks were present and repression marks absent. In cell lines and primary samples with low a-catenin expression and methylation of the promoter (N=4), the opposite pattern was observed. So called “bivalent” chromatin with mixed marks, no a-catenin methylation, and intermediated mRNA expression levels were observed with 7 additional cases (2 cell lines, 5 primary AML). Conclusions: Our data indicate that methylation of a-catenin is common in AML patients with 5q deletion but also observed in cases with normal chromosome 5 copy number. We propose a model of progressive inactivation of the a-catenin locus with AML transformation, with methylation representing a late stage event. The tissue-specificity of our results and in vivo chromatin observations in primary AML samples have implications for the timing and combinatorial therapy of MDS/AML with HDAC inhibitors and methylation inhibitors. Additionally, it appears that inactivation of adhesion molecules (ECAD, a-catenin) are frequent events overall in AML, suggesting a new pathway of transformation from MDS to AML.

Description: Abstract 3294 Background: STA-9090 is a potent, second-generation, small-molecule Hsp90 inhibitor, with a chemical structure unrelated to the first-generation, ansamycin family of Hsp90 inhibitors (e.g., 17-AAG or IPI-504). STA-9090 induces the loss of Hsp90 client proteins that are important in hematologic cancers, including BCR-ABL, c-KIT, FLT3, WT1, and JAK2. In preclinical studies, STA-9090 has shown potency up to 100 times greater than the first-generation Hsp90 inhibitors as well as activity against a wider range of kinases. In in vitro and in vivo models, STA-9090 has shown potent activity against a broad range of leukemias, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma. Methods: A safety and efficacy study of STA-9090 was undertaken for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), blast-phase chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), high-grade myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). STA-9090 was given as a weekly 1 hour infusion for 4 consecutive weeks per cycle. In the phase 1 portion of the study, an evaluation of 3 dose levels was planned: 120, 150, and 200 mg/m2; the first 2 dose cohorts are completed and dosing at 200 mg/m2 is ongoing. Plasma samples for PK analyses were collected immediately prior to infusion end (∼Cmax) on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 in cycle 1. Additional plasma samples were collected for HSP70 protein analysis, and bone marrow aspirate and blood samples were collected for biomarker and client protein analyses. Safety assessments included the number and grade of adverse events (AEs), changes from baseline in laboratory parameters, and evaluation of electrocardiogram changes. Results: To date, 18 patients (12 males, 6 females; median age 65 years, range 21–81; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] status range [0-2]) received STA-9090. Patients with the following disease types were treated: AML (n=13), ALL (n=1), biphenotypic acute leukemia (n=2), and CML without blast crisis (n=2). The median time from initial diagnosis to first treatment was 10 months; patients had received a median of 3 (range, 1–7) prior treatments and 39% were refractory to their most recent therapy. Nine patients received a median of 2.6 (range, 1–8) cycles of STA-9090 at 120mg/m2, and 9 patients received a median of 2.2 (range, 1–4) cycles of STA-9090 at 150mg/m2. AEs reported in ≥25% of patients were diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, febrile neutropenia, nausea, and anemia; the majority of these AEs were mild to moderate in severity. One patient had a DLT of grade 3 elevated bilirubin at the 120mg/m2 dose. PK analyses found that STA-9090 concentrations were comparable across study days, indicative of a lack of drug accumulation. Quantitative flow cytometric analyses measuring effect of STA-9090 on Hsp90 client protein levels within leukemic marrow blasts (pre-treatment and day 9) are currently being performed. Although no formal responses in this refractory group of patients have been observed to date, one patient (a 25 year old female patient with refractory AML following 3 prior regimens, including ablative allogeneic transplantation) treated at the 120mg/m2 cohort had stable disease and bone marrow blast reduction lasting 10 weeks. Conclusions: In patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, STA-9090 has been well tolerated up to dose levels of 150 mg/m2. The recommended Phase 2 dose has not yet been determined. Accrual to the study is ongoing and updated clinical and pharmacodynamic data will be presented. Disclosures: Bradley: Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Employment. Teofilovici:Synta Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Employment.

Description: Although most patients with cancer respond to therapy, few are cured. Moreover, objective clinical responses to treatment often do not even translate into substantial improvements in overall survival. For example, patients with indolent lymphoma who achieved a complete remission with conventional-dose therapies in the prerituximab era did not experience a survival advantage over similar patients treated with a “watch and wait” approach. Several studies have also shown that neither the magnitude nor the kinetics of clinical response has an impact on survival in multiple myeloma. Recent data suggesting many malignancies arise from a rare population of cells that exclusively maintains the ability to self-renew and sustains the tumor (ie, “cancer stem cells”) may help explain this paradox that response and survival are not always linked. Therapies that successfully eliminate the differentiated cancer cells characterizing the tumor may be ineffective against rare, biologically distinct cancer stem cells. New methods for assessing treatment efficacy must also be developed, as traditional response criteria measure tumor bulk and may not reflect changes in rare cancer stem cell populations. In this article, we discuss the evidence for cancer stem cells in hematologic malignancies and possible ways to begin targeting these cells and measuring clinical effectiveness of such treatment approaches.

Description: Background: Despite recent advances in the therapeutic armamentarium for AML, outcomes remain dismal for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Response rates with high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) salvage chemotherapy are approximately 20%. Multiple immune aberrations in AML lead to immune suppression, exhaustion, and senescence. Programmed Death-1 (PD-1), a co-inhibitory receptor (IR) on immune cells, suppresses immune activation and is exploited by leukemic cells to evade immune surveillance. PD-1 and other IRs are up-regulated during disease progression. We hypothesized that pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1, after HiDAC would stimulate a T-cell mediated anti-leukemic immune response. Methods: Eligibility for this study included R/R AML 18-70 years, ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of HiDAC (60 years: 1.5 gm/m2 IV Q12hours days 1-5) followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 14. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the overall complete remission (CR + CRi) rate. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety, durability of CR, overall survival (OS) and biomarker correlates of response. Overall responders were eligible to receive maintenance phase pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3weeks for up to 2 years until progression. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) was permissible before or after maintenance phase. Results: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled and evaluable (Table 1). Sixteen (43%) pts had refractory disease and 16 (43%) pts had relapsed AML with CR1 duration 3: n=1), AST elevation (32%; Grade 〉3: n=1), fatigue (27%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (24%), and maculopapular rash (19%; Grade 〉3: n=2). Grade 〉3 immune-related adverse events (iRAE) were rare (maculopapular rash: n=2, AST/ALT increase: n=2, right upper quadrant pain with lymphocytic infiltrate in liver: n=1) and self-limiting. Five (14%) pts required steroid administration for grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), grade 3 ALT elevation (n=1), grade 3 AST elevation with liver biopsy revealing no evidence of iRAE (n=1), grade 3 bilirubin subsequently deemed to be a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (n=1), and grade 3 systolic dysfunction without evidence of myocarditis by endomyocardial biopsy or cardiac MRI (n=1). Sixty-day mortality was 3% (1/37) due to progressive AML. Median time to full neutrophil (〉1x109/L) and platelet (〉100x109/L) recovery was 32 and 31 days, respectively. The overall response (ORR: CR+CRi+PR+MLFS) and composite CR (CR+CRi) rates were 46% [29%,63%] and 38% [22%,55%], respectively, meeting the primary endpoint of the study. Notably, 13/28 (46%) pts receiving HiDAC + pembrolizumab as their first salvage regimen achieved CR/CRi. Two pts refractory to HiDAC (administered within past 6 months) achieved CR including one pt who was refractory to HiDAC salvage 1 month prior to enrollment and ultimately achieved CR without evidence of minimal residual disease. Nine (24%) pts received an alloSCT. There were no instances of Grade 〉3 acute GVHD or veno-occlusive disease post-alloSCT. Nine (24%) pts received maintenance phase pembrolizumab (median # of cycles = 3; range: 1-12) for CR (n=8) or PR (n=1). Seven out of 9 pts relapsed/progressed after maintenance phase. Median follow-up among survivors, and median OS, event-free survival and disease-free survival was 7.8 months, 8.9 months [6.0,13.1], 6.9 months [4.2,11.5], and 5.7 months [1.9,7.3], respectively. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab can be safely administered after HiDAC salvage in R/R AML. Severe iRAE's were uncommon despite administration after cytotoxic chemotherapy. The addition of pembrolizumab to HiDAC led to an encouraging overall CR rate meeting the primary endpoint of the study. Immunogenomic biomarker analyses consisting of B cell receptor amplicon sequencing, RNA-seq of blasts and CD8+ T cells, CD8+ T cell receptor repertoire, whole exome sequencing and flow cytometry analyses are ongoing to determine predictors of response. These results warrant further investigation of IR blockade and other immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies after intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy in AML. Disclosures Zeidner: Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AsystBio Laboratories: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Tolero: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Vincent:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Foster:Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Coombs:Dedham Group: Consultancy; Covance: Consultancy; Cowen & Co.: Consultancy; Octopharma: Honoraria; H3 Biomedicine: Honoraria; Loxo: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria. Webster:Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding. DeZern:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Smith:Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Levis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; FUJIFILM: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Luznik:Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; WindMiL Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder. Serody:Merck: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Gojo:Amphivena: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Pembrolizumab is investigational for AML.

Description: We recently demonstrated that multiple myeloma (MM) is organized in a hierarchical manner in which clonogenic MM progenitors or stem cells resembling post-germinal B cells give rise to MM plasma cells (PC). To study the potential biologic differences between MM stem cells and MM PC, we examined each cellular subset for characteristics found in normal stem cells as well as their responses to various antitumor agents. The human MM cell lines RPMI 8226 and NCI-H929 were initially studied as we previously found that they recapitulate clinical MM specimens and consist of distinct cell populations based on the expression of the PC surface antigen CD138; CD138+ cells resemble typical MM PC, whereas CD138neg cells express B cell surface antigens and have greater clonogenic capacity. Examination of these cellular subpopulations by flow cytometry demonstrated that CD138neg cells were smaller and less granular by light scatter than CD138+ PC and expressed higher levels of the intracellular enzyme aldehyde dehydrogenase that is present in normal hematopoietic progenitors with self-renewal potential. Furthermore, cells expressing the side population phenotype after staining with the DNA binding dye Hoechst 33342 were exclusively CD138neg. We also investigated the effects of different clinically applicable agents on CD138+ and CD138neg cells. CD138+ and CD138neg cells isolated from RPMI 8226 and NCI-H929 cells by fluorescence activated cell sorting were treated with dexamethasone (dex, 100nM), bortezomib (velcade, 10nM), CC5013 (revlimid, 1μM), rituximab (10μg/ml) or alemtuzumab (campath,10μg/ml) for 72 hours followed by plating in methylcellulose to assess clonogenic capacity. CD138+ PC were significantly inhibited by dex (27 ± 11% recovery compared to untreated control cells), velcade (14 ± 6%) and revlimid (44 ± 27%), whereas rituximab (92 ± 25%) and campath (97 ± 18%) had little activity. In contrast, clonogenic growth of CD138neg cells was not significantly inhibited by dex (82 ± 19%), velcade (88 ± 29%), or revlimid (91 ± 14%), but was significantly decreased by rituximab (63 ± 22%) and campath (47 ± 27%). Similarly, clonogenic MM growth of CD138neg cells from 4 clinical MM samples was not affected by dex (84 ± 9%), velcade (82 ± 24%), or revlimid (93 ± 11%), but was significantly inhibited by rituximab (19 ± 7%) or campath (15 ± 11%). Clonogenic MM precursors may be distinguished from MM PC by a variety of biological parameters typically expressed by normal stem cells. Furthermore, these cellular subsets have different susceptibilities to a variety of clinical agents, and agents with activity against MM PC may be ineffective against MM stem cells. Moreover, agents without activity agasint MM PC may have major activity against MM stem cells. The divergent sensitivities of MM stem cells and PC may explain the dramatic, but transient, responses seen with many agents. Therapeutic strategies that result in long-term remissions may require the inhibition of both MM PC to reduce clinical symptoms and MM stem cells responsible for relapse.