ALBERT

Description: Background: The trombopoietin receptor agonists (TRAs) romiplostim and eltrombopag are effective and safe in the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). However, when no response is achieved or when adverse events occur with one TRA the value of the sequential use of romiplostim and eltrombopag has not been clearly established. Here we have evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of using eltrombopag after romiplostim in ITP. Methods: Fifty-one primary ITP patients (aged 18 years or more) who had been sequentially treated first with romiplostim and then with eltrombopag in the Spanish Eltrombopag Registry were retrospectively evaluated. In accordance with the usual standards, complete response was defined as a platelet count of 100x109/L and a response as a platelet count of 30x109/L or a count of at least twice the initial (pre-treatment) value. This study was performed in accordance with the standards of the Helsinki declaration and approved by the Hospital Universitario de Burgos Ethics Committee. Results: The median age of our cohort was 49 [range, 18–83] years. There were 32 women and 19 men. According to the standard definition, patients were allocated to newly diagnosed (n=2), persistent (n=5) and chronic (n=44) ITP groups. The median number of therapies prior to administration of eltrombopag was 4 [range, 2–9], including splenectomy (39%), rituximab (33%) and romiplostim (100%). The median duration of romiplostim use before switching to eltrombopag was 12 (IQR 5–21) months. The reasons for switching from the romiplostim to eltrombopag were: lack of efficacy of romiplostim (n=25), patient's preference (n=16), platelet-count fluctuation (n=6), and side-effects (n=4). The initial response rate to eltrombopag was 41/51 (80.5%), including 67% (n=34) of cases with complete remission. After a median follow-up of 13 months with eltrombopag, 39 patients maintained their response. When eltrombopag was used for patients who were refractory to the maximum romiplostim dose the initial response rate of eltrombopag was 25%. However, 83% of patients who relapsed after their initial response to romiplostim responded to eltrombopag. Sixteen romiplostim responders requested their physicians to switch them to eltrombopag because they preferred an oral drug. The efficacy was maintained after switching in all 16 patients. In the platelet-count fluctuation group, the initial response rate was also 100%. All 4 patients who were switched to eltrombopag because they experienced side-effects of romiplostim achieved complete remission with eltrombopag and their adverse events were resolved. 16 / 51 (33%) patients experienced one or more adverse event during treatment with eltrombopag. The frequency of grade 3–4 adverse events during treatment with eltrombopag was 9.8%. Conclusion: The use of eltrombopag after romiplostim for treating ITP is effective and safe. The reason for discontinuing romiplostim was associated with the response to eltrombopag. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background: Eltrombopag is effective and safe for treating chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) patients who have not responded to previous therapy. Interestingly, some patients in whom hemostatic platelet counts are achieved with eltrombopag may sustain the platelet response when eltrombopag ceases to be administered. However, the frequency of sustained responses after discontinuing eltrombopag without additional therapy for ITP is largely unknown. Methods: A total of 260 adult patients (aged 18 years or more) with primary ITP treated with eltrombopag included in the Spanish Eltrombopag Registry were retrospectively evaluated. The study was performed in accordance with the standards of the Helsinki declaration and approved by the Hospital Universitario de Burgos Ethics Committee. Results: The median age was 62 [range, 18–93] years. There were 165 women and 95 men. According to the standard definition, patients were allocated to newly diagnosed (n=29), persistent (n=36) and chronic (n=195) ITP groups. The median time from diagnosis to eltrombopag initiation was 24 [range, 1–480] months. The median number of previous therapies was 3 [range, 0–10], including splenectomy (22%), rituximab (23%) and romiplostim (19%). The initial response rate to eltrombopag was 231/260 (89%), including 77% (n=201) cases of complete remission (platelet count ≥100 x 109/L). The median duration of eltrombopag treatment was 6 [range, 1–54] months. Eltrombopag was discontinued in 80 out of 201 (39.8%) patients who achieved CR. Reasons for eltrombopag discontinuation were: persistent response despite a reduction in dose over time (n=33), platelet count 〉400x109/L (n=29), patient’s request (n=5), aspartate aminotransferase elevation (n=3), diarrhea (n=3), thrombosis (n=3) and other reasons (n=4). For analysis of discontinuation, patients with follow-up 〈 6 months (n=15), newly diagnosed ITP (n=11) or patients who received concomitant or previous (6 months before) treatments at the start of eltrombopag use (n=5) were excluded. Of the 49 evaluable patients, 22 (45%) had an immediate relapse after stopping eltrombopag. One patient with sustained response after stopping treatment relapsed at 10 months. A total of 26 patients (53%) showed sustained response after discontinuing eltrombopag without additional ITP therapy, with a median follow-up of 9 [range, 6–25] months. These patients were characterized by a median time since ITP diagnosis of 46.5±114.1 months, with 4/26 having ITP

Description: Introduction: Carfilzomib dosed at 56 mg/m2 twice a week in combination with dexamethasone (Kd) is a standard of care for RRMM after 1-3 prior lines (PL) based on the ENDEAVOR study. Later, the ARROW study showed Kd dosed at 70 mg/m2 weekly to be superior to Kd dosed at 27 mg/m2 twice a week on RRMM patients (pts) after 2-3 PL. On the other side, Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent that has been widely combined with proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs in MM, improving their efficacy with a good safety profile. In this phase 2 randomized study, we have compared Kd plus cyclophosphamide (KCyd) with Kd in RRMM after 1-3PL, both with K dosed weekly at 70 mg/m2. Patients and methods: RRMM after 1-3 PL of therapy were included in the trial. Consistently with the ENDEAVOR population, previous therapy with proteasome inhibitors was allowed but refractory patients were excluded. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive K at a dose of 70 mg/m2 iv on days 1, 8 and 15 plus dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg PO the day on and the day after K plus/minus KCyd at a dose of 300 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 28 days-cycle, as continuous treatment until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS and key secondary endpoints included response rates, safety profile, and OS. Results: Between January 2018 and February 2020, 198 RRMM pts were included. 97 pts were randomized to KCyd and 101 to Kd. The baseline characteristics of the patients were well balanced between both groups. The median age was 70 years, and 70% and 28% of pts were older than 65 and 75. The median number of PL was one; 61% of pts had received 1 prior line. 94% and 92% of patients had been exposed to bortezomib in the KCyd and Kd and all of them were sensitive. 72% and 67% of patients had been exposed to IMiD's and 51% and 55% of them were IMiD's-refractory in the KCyd and Kd. Only 4 and 6 patients in KCyd and Kd, had received anti-CD38 antibodies being all refractory. After a median f/u of 15.6 months, median PFS was 20.7 m and 15.2 m in KCyd and Kd (p=0.2). In pts after 1PL, median PFS has not been reached in any arm (p=0.4) and in patients after 2-3PL, KCyd resulted in a median PFS of 20.7 vs 11m for Kd (p=0.4). Of note, in the IMiD-refractory population, the addition of Cy to Kd resulted in a significant benefit in terms of PFS: 26.2 months vs 7.7 months in the Kd arm (p=0.01). OS is immature with 23 and 25 events so far in KCyd and Kd, respectively. The ORR was 78% for KCyd and 73% for Kd: 20% of patients in both arms achieved at least complete response, 33% and 28% very good partial response, respectively, and 25% partial response in both arms. The MRD-ve rate was 4% and 5%. As far as toxicity is concerned, neutropenia was the only hematological adverse event more frequently reported in KCyd compared with Kd, of any grade (24% vs 11%) and grade 3-4 (13% vs 7%). This did not translate into more infections and the rate was comparable in both arms (5% G3-4 in both arms). Thrombocytopenia of any grade and grade 3-4 occurred in 14%/1% and 18%/10% in KCyd/Kd. Cardiovascular events of any grade occurred in 22% and 30% of patients in KCyd and Kd. Nine pts in KCyd developed G3-4 cardiovascular events, these included atrial fibrillation (1pt), cardiac failure (2 pts), myocardial infarct (2 pts), and hypertension (4 pts). In the Kd arm, 11 patients developed G3-4 cardiovascular events and consisted of hypertension in most of them (9 pts). Conclusion: Cyclophosphamide added to Kd 70 mg/m2 weekly in RRMM pts after 1-3 PL prolonged the PFS as compared to Kd particularly in the lenalidomide-refractory population. The administration of K at a dose of 70 mg/m2 weekly was safe and more convenient and overall, the toxicity profile was manageable in both arms. Disclosures Mateos: Abbvie/Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Regeneron: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy, Honoraria; PharmaMar-Zeltia: Consultancy; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ocio:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Asofarma: Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy; MDS: Honoraria; Secura-Bio: Consultancy; Oncopeptides: Consultancy. Sureda Balari:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck Sharpe and Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Consultancy, Honoraria. Oriol:Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosinol Dachs:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Blade Creixenti:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Takeda, Sanofi, Roche, Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline and Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Introduction:SMM is an asymptomatic and heterogeneous plasma cell disorder. The Spanish Myeloma Group demonstrated that patients at high risk of progression benefit from early treatment with Rd. In addition, our preliminary results of the curative approach (GEM-CESAR) showed encouraging results (Mateos ASH 2017). Aim: The primary end-point was to evaluate the Minimal Residual Disease negative (MRD-ve) rate by next generation flow (NGF) after induction and ASCT and the sustained MRD-ve rate at 3 and 5 yrs after ASCT as secondary end-points. Our aim was to increase the MRD -ve rate from 34% (reported in NDMM patients after VTD and ASCT) to 50%. As all patients have completed induction and ASCT, we report the results of the primary end point, efficacy and safety after induction and ASCT. Methods: In this phase II single arm trial, 90 SMM patients at high-risk of progression (〉50% at 2 yrs), younger than 70 yrs and transplant candidates were included. The high risk was defined by the presence of both ≥PC 10% and MC ≥3g/dL (Mayo criteria) or ifonly one criterion was present, patients must have a proportionof aberrant PCs within the total PCsBM compartment by immunophenotypingof 95% plus immunoparesis (Spanish criteria). Asymptomatic MM patients with any of the three biomarkers recently included into the definition of active MM were allowed to be included. Induction therapy consisted on six 4-weeks cycles of KRd in which K was given at dose of 36 mg/m2twice per week plus R at dose of 25 mg on days 1-21 and dexamethasone at dose of 40 mg weekly. Melphalan at dose of 200 mg/m2followed by ASCT was given as intensification therapy and three months later, patients received two KRd consolidation cycles followed by maintenance with R at dose of 10 mg on days 1-21 plus dex at dose of 20 mg weekly for up to 2 yrs Results: Between June 2015 and June 2017, the 90 SMM patients at high risk of progression were recruited. Twenty-eight pts (32%) shared at least one of the new biomarkers predicting imminent risk of progression to MM. The primary end point of the trial was met, since 55% of the patients who completed induction and ASCT achieved MRD -ve by NGF (sensitivity 3 x 10-6). Upon analyzing the results after induction, 88 patients completed the 6 induction cycles and were evaluable for response (two patients early discontinued): the ORR was 98% including 41% of ≥CR (32% sCR and 9% CR) and 41% of VGPR rate. Two patients were mobilization failures and one patient rejected ASCT. Two additional patients experienced biological progression before ASCT and went off the study. Eighty-three patients, therefore, proceeded to HDT-ASCT and were evaluable at day +100: the ORR was 100% including ≥CR in 63% of the patients (51% sCR and 12% CR) and VGPR rate in 23%. The MRD-ve rate increased from 31% after induction to 55% with the ASCT. No differences in outcome have been observed according neither to the definition of high risk (Mayo or Spanish model) nor ultra high risk SMM. Concerning toxicity, during induction, G3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 5 (6%) and 10 pts (11%), respectively. G3-4 infections were the most frequent non-hematological AE observed in 16 pts (18%), followed by skin rash in 8 pts (9%). One patient reported G1 atrial fibrillation and another cardiac failure secondary to respiratory infection. Three patients reported hypertension (G2 in two and G3 in one). Thirteen patients required lenalidomide dose reduction whilst carfilzomib was not reduced in any patient. In four patients, dexamethasone was reduced. In all but two of the pts, PBSC collection was successful with a median of 4.10 x 106/Kg CD34 cells collected. All patients engrafted. Consolidation and maintenance phases are ongoing. After a median follow-up of 17 months (5-36), 94% of patients remain alive and free of progression and 97% of them alive. Three patients experienced biological progression and discontinued the study: one of them was refractory to the rescue therapies and died and the other two are receiving rescue therapies. One additional patient died early during induction due to a massive ischemic stroke unrelated to the treatment. Conclusions: Although longer follow-up is required, this "curative strategy for high risk SMM" continues being encouraging with an acceptable toxicity profile. The study has met its primary endpoint. The depth of response improved over the treatment: 63% of patients who completed induction and ASCT achieved ≥CR with a MRD-ve rate of 55%. Disclosures Mateos: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rodriguez Otero:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Employment. Ocio:AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Rosinol:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Alegre:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Puig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. García Mateo:Binding Site: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Description: Abstract 1382 The effectiveness of rituximab maintenance in the treatment of CLL has been investigated in a phase II clinical trial that includes two treatment parts. First, patients were given R-FCM up to 6 cycles as induction therapy, achieving an overall response rate of 93% and 46% of CR with negative minimal residual disease (MRD) (Bosch et al. JCO, etc). Second, three months after concluding R-FCM, patients having achieved CR or PR receive rituximab maintenance (375 mg/m2) every three months for two years (up to 8 cycles). We present here the preliminary results of the second part of the study, namely the efficacy of rituximab maintenance. Evaluation of response was performed three months after the last cycle of maintenance and included bone marrow (BM) examination, MRD assessment in peripheral blood and BM by four-color flow cytometry. Patients in whom rituximab maintenance was prematurely interrupted due to toxicity were considered as failures. Fifty-six patients (median age 60 years, 70% female) responding to R-FCM were evaluable for response to rituximab maintenance. Median number of cycles of maintenance given was 8 (range, 3 to 8), 77% of patients completed the entire planned treatment, whereas 91% received 6 or more cycles. Treatment was delayed due to insufficient hematological recovery in 12 cycles (2.7%). Toxicity was mainly hematological, with neutropenia being observed in 31.8% of cycles (Grade 3&4 in 8.9%), thrombocytopenia in 3.4% and anemia in 3.9%. Hypogammaglobulinemia occurred in 38% of patients (low levels of IgA in 50%, IgG in 34%, and IgM in 60%). Eight patients, three of them with hypogammaglobulinemia, experienced grade 3&4 infectious episodes (4 pneumonia, 2 gastrointestinal, 1 myositis, and 1 cerebral abscess). Herpes virus (I/VZ) reactivation was observed in 8 patients. Two patients died due to multifocal leukoencephalopathy and hemophagocytic syndrome, respectively. After rituximab maintenance, 44.6% of patients were in CR MRD negative, 41% in CR, 3.6% in PR, and 10.7% failed to treatment. Failures were due to disease progression (two patients), development of severe neutropenia (two patients), and death (two patients). Among 28 patients that were in CR MRD (-) at the onset of the maintenance part, 19 held the MRD negative status at the end of maintenance, 5 (18%) turned negative into positive MRD (probability of conversion, 40% at 30 months), whereas 4 failed to treatment (2 neutropenia, 1 progression, 1 death). Moreover, 5 of 24 patients (22%) in CR MRD(+) after R-FCM became MRD negative after rituximab maintenance, 17 maintained the CR, one patient achieved a PR, and one patient progressed under maintenance (Table 1). In conclusion, rituximab maintenance after chemoimmunotherapy seems to prolong duration of response and, in some cases, improves the quality of response towards a CR with negative MRD. Maintenance with rituximab had the major benefit in patients in CR with positive MRD. The exact role and the best dosage and treatment schedule of rituximab as maintenance therapy in CLL should be now investigated in randomized clinical trials. Disclosures: Bosch: Hoffman La Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Rituximab is currently not approved as maintenance therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Garcia-Marco:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Description: Background: A previous report of the PETHEMA Group (Sanz et al, Blood 2004) showed that a risk-adapted strategy combining ATRA and anthracycline monochemotherapy for induction and consolidation (LPA99 trial), followed by ATRA and low dose methotrexate and mercaptopurine for maintenance therapy, resulted in high antileukemic efficacy, moderate toxicity, and a high degree of compliance. A critical analysis of this study led us to consider the following opportunities for improvement in a new trial: the observation of a lack of relapses in non high-risk patients (WBC counts

Description: Background: Eltrombopag is an oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) drug approved in primary chronic ITP. Lack of clinical trials in secondary ITP avoids a clear demonstration of its potential in terms of safety and efficacy on secondary ITP. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in secondary ITP patients in daily clinical practice in Spain. Methods: Ninety-eight secondary ITP patients (aged 18 years or more) from 30 Spanish centers, treated with eltrombopag and included in the Spanish Eltrombopag Registry were retrospectively evaluated. Our study was performed in accordance with the standards of the Helsinki declaration and approved by the Hospital Universitario de Burgos Ethics Committee. Results: Our case series included 98 patients we allocated to four categories: immune disorders (n=47), infections (n=23), lymphoproliferative disorders (n=20), and neoplasms (n=8). The median age of the cohort was 62 (IQR, 40-71) years with 38 men and 60 women. At diagnosis, 34 patients had a Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 2 or more. Median time from ITP diagnosis to eltrombopag initiation was 13 (IQR, 2-66) months. Median number of therapies against thrombocytopenia before eltrombopag was 2 (IQR, 1-3), including rituximab (24), splenectomy (18) and romiplostim (13). Median platelet count when treatment started was 15 x 109/L (IQR, 5-43 x 109/L). Meanwhile, 44 patients had bleeding symptoms. Concomitant therapy was administered to 55 ITP (corticoids in 33) (Table I). Whole cohort eltrombopag response rate was 59% of responses (R; platelet count ≥30 x109/L and at least 2-fold increase the baseline count and absence of bleeding) with 52% of complete responses (CR; platelet count 〉100 x 109/L). Regarding the disease associated to ITP we observed high response rates in immune disorders and infection groups (67% of R, 76 % of R, respectively). Nevertheless, in lymphoproliferative disorders and neoplastic groups efficacy rates were much lower (36 % of R, 37 % of R respectively). The proportion of patients achieving platelet response was quite similar regardless the other studied parameters: age, sex, concomitant treatment, bleeding and platelet count at start of eltrombopag treatment. 30 adverse events were reported with eltrombopag, being 18 of them grade 3-4. 14 deaths were observed but only two were caused by bleeding. The remaining causes of death were: 4 because of bacterial sepsis and another 4 due to progression of basal disease. 2 secondary neoplasms, 1 aspergillosis and one death due to a non-treated severe anemia were also reported (Table II). Conclusion: The use of eltrombopag for treating secondary ITP is effective and safe. To point out, its efficacy in lymphoproliferative disorders and in neoplasm-associated ITP is lower than in benign diseases. Certainly, more studies are needed to confirm usefulness of TPO-RAs in secondary ITP cases. Table 1. Patient characteristics Variable Total(n = 98) Type of disease, n Immune disorders  SLE 13  Evans Syndrome 8  Antiphospholipid Syndrome 6  Sjögren Syndrome 5  Rheumatoid Arthritis 3  Immunodeficiencies 3  Autoimmune Hepatitis 2  Primary Biliary Cirrhosis 2  Psoriatic arthritis 1  Evans Syndrome-Immunodeficiencies 1  Evans Syndrome-HCV 1  Graves-Basedow disease 1  Inflammatory Bowel disease 1 Lymphoproliferative disorders  Lymphoproliferative diseases 16  HCV-Lymphoma 3  HIV-Lymphoma 1 Infections  Hepatitis C Virus 16  HIV 5  HCV-HIV 2 Neoplasms  Myeloid Neoplasms 8 Age, years, median [Q1;Q3] 62[40;71] Men/Women n 38/60 Bleeding at start of eltrombopag treatment, n 44 Concomitant treatment, n 55  Corticoids 33  Immunoglobulins 6  Corticoids and Immunoglobulins 7 Table 2. Adverse events with Eltrombopag Variable n Total, n 30 Serious Adverse Events (Grade 3-4), n 18  Progression of basal disease 4  Severe Bacterial Infections 3  Deep venous thrombosis 3  Stroke 2  Medullary fibrosis 2  Severe Bleeding 1  Aspergillosis 1  Pulmonary Embolism 1  Secondary neoplasms 1  Acute Pancreatitis 1  Acute Myocardial Infarction 1 Deaths, n 14  Bacterial Infections 4  Progression of basal disease 4  Secondary neoplasms 2  Severe Bleeding 2  Aspergillosis 1   Severe Anemia due to negative of patient to transfusion 1 Disclosures Off Label Use: We describe the possibility of using eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor analog, for secondary ITP patients..

Description: Background: Eltrombopag is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved for primary chronic ITP patients. Due to the non-existence of clinical trials using eltrombopag in persistent and newly diagnosed ITP, there are no clear data about its usefulness in this setting. Aims: To evaluate efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in persistent, newly diagnosed and chronic ITP in routine clinical practice in Spain. Methods: Two hundred and twenty adult ITP patients from thirty Spanish centers who had been treated with eltrombopag and included in the Spanish Eltrombopag Registry were retrospectively evaluated. This study was performed in accordance with the standards of the Helsinki declaration and approved by the Hospital Universitario de Burgos Ethics Committee. Results: Here we report efficacy and safety results of primary ITP Spanish Eltrombopag Registry cohort. According to the standard definition, patients were allocated to newly diagnosed (n=30), persistent (n=30) and chronic (n=160) ITP groups. Each group is described separately in Table I. There are no statistical significant differences regarding response and duration of response among ITP groups. There is a trend towards a greater efficacy in newly diagnosed ITP with 93.3% of responses (platelet count ≥30 x109/L and at least two-fold increase the baseline count and absence of bleeding) and 86.7% of complete responses (CR; platelet count 〉100 x 109/L). Persistent ITP achieved 83.3% of responses and 80.0% of CR. Similarly 79.4% of responses with 73.1 of CR were observed in chronic ITP. Response rates were similar in all groups regardless all other studied parameters. Another trend towards a longer response duration in persistent ITP was found, with a median of 424 (IQR, 288-664) days. Response durations were similar in chronic ITP (median, 370 days; IQR, 174-624) and in newly diagnosed ITP (median, 378 days; IQR, 154-485). In newly diagnosed ITP, eight adverse events (AEs) with only three grade 3-4 AEs were observed. We reported three deaths; Two of them were due to upper respiratory tract infections in previously diagnosed pulmonary patients. A cerebral hemorrhage was the only death directly related to thrombocytopenia. In persistent ITP, four grade 1-2 AEs and two grade 3-4 AEs (one stroke, one cerebral bleeding) were reported. The only observed death was secondary to the mentioned cerebral hemorrhage. Twenty-one grade 1-2 AEs, ten grade 3-4 AEs and eight deaths (only two caused by bleeding) occurred in chronic ITP. Conclusion: Use of eltrombopag for treating persistent and newly diagnosed ITP is effective and safe. However, more studies are needed to confirm usefulness of TPO-RAs in this setting. Table 1. Patient characteristics Variable Newly-Diagnosed ITP (n = 30) Persistent ITP(n=30) Chronic ITP (n=160) Age, years, median [Q1;Q3] 66[46;79] 66[47;76] 61[47;75] Men/Women n 12/18 15/15 47/113 Charlson comorbidity Index 〉 1, n (%) 7(25.9) 5(17.2) 25(16.7) Months with ITP, median [Q1;Q3] 1[1;2] 6[4;10] 79[30;193] Past ITP treatments, median [Q1;Q3] Rituximab, n (%) Splenectomy, n (%) Romiplostim, n (%) 2[1;3] 3(10.7) 2(7.1) 3(10.7) 2[1;3] 5(17.2) 4(13.8) 4(13.8) 3[2;4] 43(28.3) 47(30.7) 37(24.3) Platelet count at start of eltrombopag treatment, (x109/L), median [Q1;Q3]Bleeding at start of eltrombopag treatment , n (%)Concomitant treatment, n (%) Corticoids Immunoglobulins Corticoids and Immunoglobulins 15[7;29] 13(43.3) 10(33.3) 6(60) 0 2(20) 14[6;26] 10(33.3) 9(30) 7(77.8) 0 2(22.2) 22 [9;38] 50 (31.3) 46 (28.8) 27 (57.4) 10 (21.3) 8 (17) Disclosures Off Label Use: We describe the possibility of using eltrombopag, an oral thrombopoietin receptor analog, for persistent and newly diagnosed ITP patients..

Description: Introduction:Renal impairment (RI) is a common complication in multiple myeloma (MM) with an incidence of 20-40%, due to the older age of the affected patients (pts) and the nature of the disease. Prognosis of pts with RI has improved in recent years (yrs), but remains closely associated with the recovery of renal function. There is little information on the renal response of relapsed refractory MM (RRMM) to new antimyeloma drugs within clinical practice, using standardized criteria such as glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by the Cockroft-Gault (CG) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas.The primary objective of the study is to describe the renal response in RRMM pts with moderate (CrCl 30–50 mL/min) or severe renal impairment (RI) (CrCl 〈 30 mL/min) after initiating treatment (Tx). Secondary objectives include response rate, overall survival (OS), safety, and health resource utilization. We present results from a pre-planned, interim analysis with a data cut-off of June 15, 2014. Methods:This is a large ongoing observational, prospective, multicenter study in RRMM pts with moderate or severe RI (based on the CG formula) receiving antimyeloma Tx. The overall planned sample size is 300 pts to be followed for up to 36 months (mos) after the end of Tx. Renal and MM responses are evaluated according to the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Renal complete response (renalCR) is defined as a sustained (for at least 2 mos) increase of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) to ≥ 60 mL/min; a partial renal response (renalPR) is defined as an increase from 〈 15 to 30–59 mL/min, and a minor renal response (renalMR) from 〈 15 to 15–29 mL/min or, from 15–29 to 30–59 mL/min. Results:A total of 150 pts were included in the interim analysis, mean ± SD age was 74 ± 9 yrs, 53% were male, and 53% had moderate and 47% had severe RI. At baseline, 57% of pts were in first relapse. At diagnosis, 45% of pts had ISS stage III, 29% had ISS stage II, 9% had ISS stage I, and 17% had no ISS stage available. Main antimyeloma therapies were: lenalidomide (LEN)-based (37%), bortezomib (BORT)-based (30%), BORT + LEN based (5%), chemotherapy-based (25%) and, thalidomide-based (3%). The median follow-up was 4 mos. To date 38% of pts have discontinued Tx, 13% due to adverse events (AEs), and 29% have died. The main causes of death were: disease progression (8.7%), infection (6.7%), respiratory failure (3.3%), kidney insufficiency (2%), fractures (2%). The mean baseline CG/MDRD was 39.7/42.2 (± 6.3/10.2) mL/min in the moderate RI subgroup and 20.2/19.8 (± 7.6/9.8) mL/min in pts with severe RI (correlation coefficient CG vs. MDRD: 0.93). Overall, 15.3% (n = 23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.5–21.1,) had a renal response according to the CG formula, i.e. renal function iimproved by at least 1 KDIGO stage; 4.7% had renalCR, 0.7% renalPR and 10% renalMR. According to the MDRD formula, the renal response was 21.3% (8.6% renalCR, 12.7% renalMR). Median time to best renal response was 1.5 (range 0.6–4.6) mos. The renal response based on CG/MDRD according to antimyeloma therapies was 10.9%/20% for LEN-based, 26.7%/31.1% for BORT-based, 0%/12.5%, for LEN + BORT-based, and 10.2%/15.4%, for chemotherapy-based therapies. 24 hour (hr) proteinuria measurement was available at baseline in 70 pts (median of 1.3 g/24 hr), 77.1% of whom had 〉 0.3g/24 hr. Of these, 4 (7.4%) achieved complete proteinuria response (〈 0.3g/24 hr) and 4 (7.4%) achieved partial response (〈 1g/24 hr) by the 4th follow-up visit. The overall myeloma response (≥ partial response) was 38.0% achieved after a median of 2.9 (1.3–5.2) mos. LEN-based myeloma response was 45.5%, BORT-based 48.9% and LEN + BORT-based 50.0%. These responses seemed to be higher than those obtained with chemotherapy-based therapies (17.6%). The median time to progression (TTP) was 4.5 mos (95% CI 4.2–7.3). TTP was 16.2 mos with LEN-based, 11.8 mos with BORT-based, not reached with LEN + BORT-based, and 8.3 mos with chemotherapy-based therapies. Overall, 52% of pts had an AE and 12% a serious related AE. Conclusions: The most commonly used Tx in clinical practice in RRMM pts with RI are LEN or BORT-based. The results of this interim analysis suggest that these Tx can improve RI in approximately 15% of cases, and are associated with a higher antimyeloma response than chemotherapy-based Tx. Disclosures Morales: Celgene: Consultancy. Ruiz Boza:Celgene : Employment, Other. Garcia:Celgene: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction and Objective: Extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTL-NT) is associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and is much more common in Asia and Latin America than in western countries. Data on disease presentation and outcome from European series are very limited. The objective of the study is to analyze the clinical characteristics at diagnosis, treatment received and outcome of a series of patients from Spain. Patients and Methods: Eigthy-seven patients with ENKTL-NT diagnosed from 2000 to 2017 were identified in 24 academic centers in Spain. Clinical data were collected retrospectively. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Variables included in the univariate analysis were: race, gender, age, previous sinusitis, nasal localization, Ann Arbor stage, ECOG performance status (PS), B symptoms, LDH, beta2-microglobulin, albumin and C-reactive protein. Multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional hazard regression model. Results: Clinical characteristics at diagnosis are shown in Table 1. Seventy-seven patients received active treatment, 31 (40%) with chemotherapy (CT) alone, 39 (51%) with CT and radiotherapy (RT), 7 (9%) with RT alone (median dose 50 Gy). First line therapies were: CHOP/CHOP-like in 30 (42%) patients, high-dose L-Asparaginase-containing regimens in 27 (38%), and other regimens in 14 (20%); 12 patients proceeded to stem-cell transplant in first line (10 auto / 2 allo). Response rate was evaluable in 70 patients (by PET/TC in 55%): CR 35 (50%), PR 9 (13%), SD/progression 26 (37%). Median number of CT lines was 2 (1-6). With a median follow-up of 38 months, 3 yr OS was 38% (95% CI 27-49), and 3 yr PFS 25% (95% CI 14-35). Causes of death were: progression 35 (67%), toxicity 12 (23%), second neoplasms 5 (10%). The variables at diagnosis significantly associated with poor OS were: age ≥ 60 yr, extranasal disease, Ann Arbor III-IV, ECOG PS 2-4, increased LDH, and decreased albumin. In the multivariate analysis including all the previous variables, ECOG 2-4 PS (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-7.0) and low albumin (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-9.3) maintained the negative influence in OS. Patients treated with regimens that included high dose L-Asparaginase had 3 yr OS of 61% (95%CI 40-82), compared with patients treated with CHOP/CHOP-like 3 yr OS of 19% (95%CI 5-32) (p=0.009). These differences were statistically significant both in patients with nasal involvement (3 yr OS 82% with L-Asparaginase vs 21% with CHOP, p=0.01) or with localized disease (3 yr OS 71% with L-Asparaginase vs 24% with CHOP, p=0.03). Differences were not statistically significant in patients with extranasal involvement (3 yr OS 48% with L-Asparaginase vs 14% with RCHOP, p=0.2), or advance disease (3 yr OS 48% with L-Asparaginase vs 14% with CHOP, p=0.2), probably because the low number of patients. Conclusion: This is the largest series reported of Caucasian patients with ENKTL-NT. Patients are young at diagnosis and one fourth had a previous history of chronic sinusitis. This population has a poor outcome, being progression the main cause of death. Poor clinical condition at diagnosis (high ECOG PS and low albumin level) is the main factor related with poor survival. Therapies with high dose L-Asparaginase improve the survival in this western population compared with the classical CHOP regimen. Disclosures González-Barca: Roche: Speakers Bureau; Celtrion: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Martín:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Panizo:BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Acerta Pharma: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Sanchez Blanco:Gilead: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Marin Niebla:Roche: Consultancy, Other: Medical education of Staff, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Medical education of Staff, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Other: Medical education of Staff, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other: Medical education of Staff, Speakers Bureau. Queizan:Janssen: Consultancy. Lopez:Roche: Research Funding.