ALBERT

Description: Cytogenetic analysis is invaluable for the detection of chromosome abnormalities in tumor samples and is the "gold standard" technique (unique in providing a complete overview of the chromosome complement). Cytogenetic studies of lymph node specimens (LN) can be challenging due to progressively smaller biopsies being procured, low viability, and low proliferative rates. Typically, the initial laboratory evaluation of LN includes flow cytometry and/or immunohistochemistry. Due to overlapping immunophenotypic and morphologic features of some lymphomas, these studies can be insufficient to properly classify a lymphoid neoplasm. Interphase FISH is the test most frequently utilized for LN genetic evaluation. Although FISH has higher sensitivity than conventional cytogenetics, there is vast literature on the existence of cytogenetic abnormalities that are not targeted by the FISH probe(s) used in most laboratories. This is predominantly true for CLL/SLL, but it is also seen in other lymphomas, particularly those characterized by variant translocations involving closely related genes, such as mantle cell lymphoma with alternate translocations involving the CCND2 or CCND3 genes, or lymphomas carrying MYC rearrangements where the partner is not IGH (translocation partners other than Ig genes might merit less aggressive therapy). To achieve the same information obtained from an abnormal karyotype, it is usually necessary to perform multiple FISH tests with significantly increased costs. Genomic microarray and sequencing also have limitations. Microarray can only detect DNA unbalances (missing the balanced translocations that characterize most lymphomas). These whole genomic tests cannot detect multiple related clones indicative of clonal evolution, or unrelated clonal populations indicative of distinct lymphoid neoplasms in the same specimen. Successful cytogenetics offers the best visual representation of the whole chromosome complement and often yields information making it unnecessary to perform additional genetic tests. It should be noted that alternative genetic tests are extremely useful for cases with normal chromosome results or those that lack metaphase cells for analysis, as well as those with cytogenetically cryptic rearrangements or mutations. Recent studies indicate that complex karyotypes in lymphomas are, in general, indicative of transformation and/or worse prognosis. In the present study, for example, several follicular lymphoma cases displayed other abnormalities in addition to the typical t(14;18), some of which are known to be associated with transformation, i.e., deletions 1p, 6q, and 10q. We present our experience with 362 LN received over a 15 month period during 2014 and 2015. See Table below. Through correlation with all diagnostic test results from our laboratory, we demonstrate the unique value of cytogenetic evaluation of lymphoid tissues, optimizing diagnostic/prognostic assessment and, thereby, improving patient management/therapeutic decisions, while achieving cost reduction. Table. A) Summary of cases and subdivision based on successful cytogenetics and normal or abnormal flow/morphology versus normal or abnormal cytogenetics; B) Detailed information on the number of the various lymphoid neoplasms included in our study. Total Cases: 362 No metaphases: 67 (19%) With metaphases: 295 (81%) Normal flow/morphology and normal cytogenetics 74 (25%) Abnormal flow and/or morphology 221 (75%) Normal cytogenetics: 59 (27%) Abnormal Cytogenetics: 162 (73%) Table. Final Diagnosis (Abnormal cytogenetic cases) # cases Sex (M/F) # FISH FISH Abnormal/normal FL 56 25/31 43 43/0 SLL/CLL 32 20/12 21 20/1 HGL 14 7/7 0 0 TCL 14 7/7 5 3/2 MZBCL 13 8/5 8 5/3 DH/THL 10 6/4 10 10/0 DLBCL 8 4/4 8 7/1 MCL 7 4/3 5 4/1 CD30+ 2 0/2 2 1/1 NGCL 2 0/2 2 1/1 BL 1 1/0 1 1/0 LPL 1 1/0 0 0 B-ALL/LBL 1 0/1 1 1/0 HL 1 1/0 1 1/0 Totals 162 84/78 107 (66%) 97/10 Abbreviations: FL, follicular lymphoma; SLL/CLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma/chronic lymphocytic leukemia; HGL, high-grade lymphoma; TCL, T-cell lymphoma; MZBCL, marginal zone B-cell lymphoma; DH/THL, double hit/triple-hit lymphoma; DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; MCL, mantle cell lymphoma,; CD30+, CD30-positive large B-cell lymphoma; NGCL, non-germinal center lymphoma; BL, Burkitt lymphoma; LPL, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma; B-ALL/LBL, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma; HL, Hodgkin lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Relapse remains the major cause of death in older patients transplanted for AML in first complete remission (CR1) or for patients with advanced MDS at any age. Conventional myeloablative conditioning followed by allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation is associated with significantly less relapse compared with RIC when performed in younger patients with AML or MDS, but the toxicity of this approach in older patients is prohibitive. We hypothesized that pharmacokinetic targeting to optimize busulfan (Bu) exposure, combined with the administration of AZA post transplantation would mitigate the risk of relapse while avoiding non-relapse mortality (NRM) and ultimately improve progression free survival (PFS). Here we report the results of a Bu test dose strategy targeting daily Bu exposure as determined by the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC). The primary endpoint of the study was two year progression free survival (PFS). An important secondary objective was to determine whether administration of a test dose of Bu with post test sampling would enable achievement of a daily target Bu AUC level of 4000 uM*min in at least 80% of the recipients. We used this strategy as part of a RIC regimen on a prospective multi-center phase II trial conducted by the Alliance (formerly Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)). Eligibility included patients with AML in CR1 aged 60-74 years inclusive, MDS with IPSS risk 〉 Int-2 with less than 10% marrow blasts and age

Description: Background: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are associated with shortened overall survival (OS) and inferior quality of life (QOL). Age, degree of comorbidity, MDS risk group, and treatment status are all likely predictors of both outcomes. We aimed to assess the association between treatment status and patient-reported QOL in a large cohort of community-treated MDS patients at the time of presentation to tertiary care, while controlling for the other three factors. Methods: Beginning in 2006, patients with MDS presenting for their first evaluation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) were enrolled into a clinical database (consent rate 85%). Enrollment included administration of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (Aaronson, JNCI, 1993), a 30-item measure of QOL that includes subscales for global health (higher score better), fatigue (lower score better), and physical function (higher score better). Medical record review was performed to characterize baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory data. Treatment status included therapies received in the community during the 30 days prior to QOL assessment, as these were most likely to directly impact QOL. Comorbidity was assigned via the Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (mCCI; Charlson, Journal Clinical Epi, 1994). MDS prognostic group was assigned via the IPSS-R (Greenberg, Blood, 2012). Associations between treatment status and QOL scores were analyzed with separate multivariable linear regressions adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, and IPSS-R. Results: In total, 287 patients with complete QLQ-C30 data were included, of which 22% were IPSS-R very high risk, 24% high risk, 22% intermediate risk, 26% low risk, and 6% very low risk. The majority of patients (66%) were male, median age was 68 years, and the mCCI was 0 in 40%, 1-2 in 35%, and 3+ in 24%. Relative to very low risk on the IPSS-R, the unadjusted hazard ratios for death were 1.5 for low risk, 2.2 for intermediate risk, 4.9 for high risk, and 7.2 for very high risk (Ptrend

Description: Background: Adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with high-risk cytogenetics have a significantly worse survival compared to similarly treated intermediate- or favorable-risk patients. Although prior studies suggest better outcome in high-risk AML patients in first complete remission (CR1) who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) compared with consolidation chemotherapy, only 40% of patients proceed to HCT. The lack of a matched sibling donor (available in about 33%) should not be a barrier to HCT since alternative donors are available for the large majority of high-risk AMLpatients and recent data suggest outcomes after allogeneic HCT from fully matched unrelated donors are similar to those following matched related donor transplantation. We sought to determine if a prospective organized effort could rapidly identify alternative donors to improve the historical 40% allogeneic HCT rate in high-risk CR1 AML patients ≤ age 61. Secondly, we hypothesized that transplanting significantly more adults with high-risk AML in CR1 would lead to an improved outcome compared with the historical relapse-free survival (RFS) of 22%. Patients and Methods: Adult patients between ages 18 and 60 years with untreated AML were randomized to receive induction therapy with standard cytarabine plus daunorubicin (7+3; n=261), idarubicin with high-dose cytarabine (IA; n=261), or IA with vorinostat (IA+V; n=216). Conventional cytogenetics were obtained at time of enrollment and used to determine risk classification by standard criteria. All patients with high-risk cytogenetics underwent expedited HLA-typing. High-risk patientswere encouraged tobe referred for consultation with a transplant team with the goal of conducting an allogeneic HCT in CR1. Results: Of 738 eligible patients (median age, 49 years; range, 18-60), 159 (22%) had high-risk cytogenetics, of whom 60 (38%), 61 (38%), and 38 (24%) received induction with 7+3, IA, or IA+V, respectively. A total of 107 of the 159 high-risk patients achieved CR/CRi (67%). HCT was performed in 317 of all 738 patients (43%) and 68 (64%) of the high-risk patients received a transplant in CR1 (p

Description: Key Points Gain-of-function Lyn mice develop hemolytic anemia with acanthocyte red blood cells and display compensatory extramedullary erythropoiesis. Hyperactive Lyn notably alters Epo receptor signaling, particularly an Akt-FoxO3 pathway, enhancing viability and delaying differentiation.

Description: Abstract 1955 Poster Board I-978 The detection of chromosome abnormalities in mature B-cell neoplasms by conventional cytogenetics remains difficult, mainly due to the low proliferative rate of mature lymphoid cells. The current FISH panel for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is designed to detect some of the more common abnormalities of prognostic significance in CLL [i.e., del(6q), del(11q), +12, del(13q), del(17p)]. This CLL FISH panel has improved the detection rate of these markers by making it possible to obtain cytogenetic information from interphase cells; however, as it is limited to only these 5 markers, it cannot detect all abnormalities associated with CLL. More importantly, the impact of other chromosome abnormalities on prognosis and disease progression, with and without the presence of these 5 prognostic markers, is not known. CpG-oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs) such as DSP30 activate cells of the immune system in a sequence-dependent manner and promote proliferation of CLL cells in vitro [Decker et al. Blood 2000;95:999-1006]. They also upregulate costimulatory molecules and potential target antigens during immunotherapy. The use of DSP30 in combination with interleukin 2 (IL2) has proven effective in increasing the detection of chromosome abnormalities in CLL [Dicker et al. Blood 2006;108:3152-60] and other mature B-cell lymphoid malignancies by conventional cytogenetics [Struski et al. Leukemia 2009;23:617-9], when compared to the well-established B-cell mitogens. In our extensive clinical experience of incorporating DSP30/IL2 into our culture media, this cocktail has significantly increased the detection of chromosome abnormalities in CLL by conventional cytogenetics, from 55% to greater than 80%. We thus decided to investigate if various other lymphoid malignancies would respond to the mitogen activity of DSP30/IL2 as well as or better than CLL. Specifically, we evaluated 812 cases of mature B-cell lymphoid malignancies that were abnormal by flow cytometry, morphology, or cytogenetic analysis. All samples (bone marrow or blood) were cultured for approximately 72 hours using the DSP30/IL2 mitogen cocktail. Of these 812 cases, 746 (91%) provided sufficient mitotic index and quality for a complete cytogenetic analysis and interpretation. Of the CLL cases (n=509), 79 were initially interpreted as normal by conventional cytogenetic analysis, but were later interpreted as abnormal by FISH for deletion 13q only. In view of the known cryptic nature of this deletion in CLL, these cases were not included in the study, leaving a total of 430 CLL cases, and thus bringing the total number of cytogenetically successful study cases to 667. In addition to the 430 CLL cases, there were 14 variant CLLs; 36 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCLs); 35 follicular lymphomas; 34 non-Hodgkin lymphomas (not further specified); 29 marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of splenic type (sMZBCL); 27 mantle cell lymphomas (MCLs), of which 8 were blastoid; 16 MZBCL of MALT type; 13 hairy cell leukemias (HCLs); 12 lymphoproliferative disorders (not further specified); 10 lymphoplasmacytic lymphomas (LPLs); 6 Burkitt lymphomas; 3 Hodgkin lymphomas; and 2 B-cell prolymphocytic leukemias (PLLs). Of particular interest is the fact that we detected clonal abnormalities in 100% of HCLs, blastoid MCLs, variant CLLs, and B-cell PLL, as well as in 97% of sMZBCLs, 89% of DLBCLs, and 80% of LPLs This is of great importance since HCLs and LPLs are rarely abnormal by conventional cytogenetics using the more traditional combinations of mitogens making it difficult to identify markers of prognostic significance. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that the DSP30/IL2 cocktail induces proliferation of various B-cell mature lymphoid disorders and that its mitogenic action is not limited to CLL. We are continuing to develop our understanding of the considerable response of specific lymphoid malignancies to the DSP30/IL2 cocktail by correlating additional clinical data, and hope that the end result will open new avenues in regards to prognostic outcome and therapeutic approaches. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) occur in ~3% of individuals with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and have been associated with increased transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an oral, potent, targeted inhibitor of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 enzyme (mIDH1) and is approved in the US for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation in patients ≥75 years of age or who have comorbidities that preclude the use of intensive induction chemotherapy, and in adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. The first-in-human, phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib (NCT02074839) enrolled adults with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies, including R/R MDS, and the study is ongoing. In the initial phase of the study (DiNardo et al. N Engl J Med 2018), the 12 patients with R/R MDS received 500 mg ivosidenib once daily and were characterized as follows: 75% were male, median age was 72.5 years (range 52-78), and 42% were ≥75 years of age; median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-3). Adverse events (AEs) of any grade, irrespective of causality, occurring in ≥20% of the 12 patients were diarrhea, fatigue, back pain, rash (n=4 each, 33.3%), anemia, urinary tract infection, decreased appetite, hypokalemia, arthralgia, dyspnea, pruritus, and hypotension (n=3 each, 25.0%). No AEs led to permanent discontinuation of treatment. Response was assessed according to International Working Group 2006 criteria for MDS. According to investigators, five of 12 patients achieved complete remission (CR) (41.7%; 95% CI 15.2%, 72.3%); median duration of CR was not estimable for these patients (95% CI 2.8 months, not estimable). Nine of 12 patients were transfusion independent for at least 56 days during study treatment. Mutation clearance was observed in one of the 5 CR patients. Here we report the design of a new sub-study of this trial, which is being undertaken to further assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of treatment with ivosidenib in patients with R/R MDS. Methods: This sub-study is evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib. Adults with R/R MDS with an IDH1 mutation will be enrolled in the MDS sub-study. These individuals must have R/R disease after treatment with standard agents indicated for MDS. Eligible patients must have a platelet count of ≥20,000/μL, and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN]; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase ≤3.0 × ULN) and renal function (serum creatinine ≤2.0 × ULN or creatinine clearance 〉40 mL/min). Additional key inclusion criteria are bone marrow blasts 〉5% and/or transfusion dependence. Ivosidenib is to be administered at a dose of 500 mg once daily orally on Days 1 to 28 of 28-day cycles. The addition of the MDS sub-study to this phase 1 clinical study in patients with hematological malignancies will provide additional insights into the use of ivosidenib for the treatment of mIDH1 R/R MDS. Disclosures Foran: Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. DiNardo:notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; medimmune: Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; syros: Honoraria. Watts:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De Botton:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Forma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fathi:Amphivena, Kite, Jazz, NewLink Genetics,: Honoraria; Agios, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Takeda, Amphivena, Kite, Forty Seven,Trovagene, NewLink genetics, Jazz, Abbvie, and PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Stein:Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stone:AbbVie, Actinium, Agios, Argenx, Arog, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biolinerx, Celgene, Cornerstone Biopharma, Fujifilm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Ono, Orsenix, Otsuka, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sumitomo, Trovagene: Consultancy; Argenx, Celgene, Takeda Oncology: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committee: ; Novartis, Agios, Arog: Research Funding. Patel:France Foundation: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Tallman:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Oluyadi:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Winkler:Agios: Employment. Hickman:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Employment; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Astex: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunogen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an IDH1 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test in: 1) adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML who are more than 75 years old or who have comorbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy and 2) adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML. It is being evaluated in clinical trials for mutant IDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies.

Description: Abstract 634 FLT3, a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase constitutively activated via mutation in blasts of patients (pts) with AML, is an important therapeutic target. Blasts from approximately 25% of pts have a length or internal tandem duplication (ITD) mutation in the juxtamembrane region or tyrosine kinase domain (TKD1) of FLT3, which is associated with reduced disease-free survival and overall survival (OS), particularly in pts with normal cytogenetics. Blasts from 5–10% of pts have a point mutation (typically D835Y) in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD); the effect of this mutation on prognosis is uncertain. Midostaurin (PKC412) is a multi-targeted kinase inhibitor with demonstrated clinical activity in FLT3-mutant (FLT3–mut) and FLT3-wild-type (FLT3–wt) AML (peripheral blood blast reduction in 70% and 30% of pts, respectively) but rarely produces complete remissions). Preclinical studies demonstrated synergy between FLT3 inhibitors and chemotherapy. We conducted a Phase 1b trial to investigate the feasibility of administering daunorubicin (60 mg/m2 IV, days 1–3) and cytarabine (100 mg/m2 IVCI, days 1–7) induction and high-dose cytarabine post-remission therapy (3 gm/m2 over 3h every 12h, days 1, 3, and 5 for 3 cycles) plus oral midostaurin at 100 mg or 50 mg each twice daily on days 8–21 (sequentially) or days 1–7, 15–21 (concomitantly) with all chemo cycles in newly diagnosed pts under age 61 with de novo AML. Whereas 100 mg of midostaurin plus induction chemotherapy was poorly tolerated due to nausea and vomiting, the 40 pts who received 50 mg of midostaurin orally twice daily ( 20 each on the sequential and concomitant schedules; 27 FLT3–wt; 13 FLT3–mut [9 with an ITD]), tolerated the combination well. Median midostaurin exposure was 133 days (range 21–975) for the FLT3–mut pts and 90 days (range 7–1016) for FLT3–wt pts. Maintenance therapy with midostaurin was allowed with investigator discretion and was received by 5 pts (3 FLT3–mut, 2 FLT–wt). The median ages for the FLT3–wt and FLT3–mut pts were 50 years (range 25–60) and 46 years (range 20–65), respectively. 77% of the FLT3–mut pts displayed normal, 15% adverse and 8% other intermediate cytogenetics compared with 18.5%, 26%, and 26%, respectively, for FLT3-wt (also 18.5% favorable; 11% unknown). Complete response occurred in 32/40 (80%) of all pts (20/27 [74%] of FLT3–wt patients, 12/13 [92%] of FLT3–mut pts). Patients were censored at the last date they were known to be alive with a median post treatment follow-up for FLT3-mut pts of 1059 days and 1086 days for FLT3-wt. Even accounting for their differing cytogenetics and ages, the OS of the FLT3–mut subgroup was expected to be inferior to that of the FLT3–wt subgroup. However, we report that the 1 and 2 year OS for the pts with FLT3–mut AML was 85% and 62%, respectively, and was comparable to that of the FLT3–wt subgroup (81% and 59%, respectively). Although based on small numbers and not stratified for type of FLT3 mutation (TKD, ITD, ITD length, location, or allelic ratio), these long-term results suggest that combination therapy with a FLT3 inhibitor and chemotherapy might be effective enough to obviate the perceived need for allogeneic stem cell transplantation for FLT3–mut AML pts in first complete remission. Moreover, these data support the rationale for the ongoing international phase 3 study of induction, post-remission intensification, and maintenance with midostaurin (50 mg po bid) or placebo. Disclosures: Stone: Novartis: Research Funding, ad hoc consultancy; Cephalon: ad hoc consultancy. Off Label Use: midostaurin with chemothereapy for AML. Paquette:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Schiller:Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genzyme: Research Funding; Vion: Research Funding; Centocor: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Schiffer:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genzyme: Consultancy. Ehninger:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cortes:Novartis: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Wyeth: Research Funding. Kantarjian:Novartis: Research Funding. DeAngelo:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Enzon: Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Huntsman-Labed:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dutreix:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rai:Novartis: Employment, Equity Ownership. Giles:Novartis: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Vion: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction Our group has pioneered a personalized vaccine in which patient-derived acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells are fused with autologous dendritic cells (DC/AML fusion), presenting a broad array of leukemia associated antigens with DC mediated costimulation. In a clinical trial of AML patients who were vaccinated after chemotherapy-induced remission, 71% remained free of disease at median follow up of 57 months. We sought to identify factors associated with durable remission after vaccination using genomic analysis of the bone marrow microenvironment including single cell RNA-seq and TCR clonal diversity analysis. Methods Banked bone marrow samples both prior to and 1 month post-vaccination were selected from patients who maintained long disease remission for greater than 5 years and those who had early relapse. FFPE marrow core biopsy samples (N=10) were the source for gene expression analysis. NEBNext ultra II directional library prep kit and Illumina NextSeq 500/550 system were used to generate reliable high quality RNA sequencing data. Differentially expressed genes were identified by p-value (≤0.01) and fold change (≥2) using Linear Models for Microarray (Limma) approach. Ingenuity Pathways IPA 9.0 was then used to define pathways and upstream regulators. Flash frozen samples (N=4) were analyzed by RNAseq at the single cell level using a standard 10X genomics approach with cell cluster annotation performed with Single Cell Wizard software. Banked peripheral blood was used to evaluate TCR diversity with Takara SMART-Seq next-generation sequencing to amplify variable regions of TCR- α/β subunits. Results Heatmaps depict significant differential gene expression in bone marrow biopsies both pre- and post-vaccination in patients who remained in long-term remission (responders) compared to those who relapsed (non-responders). Prior to vaccination there was modest upregulation of immune activation pathways including IL-7, IL-17A as well as inhibition of TGF-b in responders, suggesting a role of the micro-environment in modulating response. Significantly upregulated pathways in responders after vaccination (p value