ALBERT

Description: Key Points Increased immune suppressors and PD-1 abrogates effector responses in CML patients at diagnosis. Enhanced net effector immune responses and decreased PD-1 and immune suppressors may promote sustained deep molecular response in CML.

Description: We hypothesized that immune responses contribute to deep BCR-ABL molecular responses in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). We studied 32 CML patients; 16 at diagnosis, patients treated with imatinib (n=20), nilotinib (n=9) or dasatinib (n=3). Methodology: The effector immune responses of Natural Killer (NK) cells were characterized by flowcytometry and functional analysis by CD107a degranulation assay. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses to leukaemia-associated antigens (LAAs) WT1, BMI-1, PR3 and PRAME were quantified by interferon-gamma ELISPOT using peptide libraries of 15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 amino acids spanning the entire protein, or HLA-A0201 specific peptides in HLA-A0201+ patients. Immune suppressor regulatory T cells (Treg), Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSC), Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) expression on T cells, NK cells, B cells and monocytes, and major B cell subsets were extensively characterized by flowcytometry. Results: Patients in deep molecular response (MR4.5; BCR-ABL

Description: Introduction:An attempt at tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) withdrawal in deep molecular remission leads either to treatment free remission (TFR) or early molecular relapse (MolR) in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients. We hypothesise that immune responses promote sustained TFR and immunological markers may predict response following TFR attempt. Methodology: We studied 54 CML patients (from ALLG trials CML 8, median follow-up 66 mo, and CML 10, median follow-up 24 mo) at baseline on TKI (minimum 24 mo MR4.5) and 3 mo and 6 mo following TKI discontinuation. MolR was defined as any single sample on follow-up with BCR-ABL1 〉0.1% or two consecutive BCR-ABL1 positive samples at any value. Effector immune responses of CD56dim natural killer (NK) cells and NK cell receptor repertoire were characterised by flow cytometry and cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses to leukaemia-associated-antigens (LAAs) WT1, BMI-1, PR3 and PRAME by interferon-gamma ELISPOT. Immune suppressor regulatory T cells (Treg; CD4+CD25brightCD127-FoxP3+), Granulocytic and Monocytic Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells (MDSCs; HLA-DR-Lin-CD11b+CD33+CD66b+CD15+ and HLA-DR-Lin-CD11b+CD33+CD66b-CD14+, respectively), Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) expression on T cells, NK cells, B cells and Monocytes, and major B cell subsets were characterized by flow cytometry. Results: TFR patients displayed increased CD3-CD56dimCD16bright cytolytic NK cells as a proportion of total lymphocytes at baseline (n=23, 27.1% ± 2.9) vs MolR (n=23, 19.1% ± 2.0, p=0.02). TFR patients displayed a more mature CD56dim CD57+ NK cell phenotype at baseline (74.5% ± 2.2 of total NK cells) vs MolR (66.3% ± 2.7, p=0.04). Extensive characterisation of NK cell receptor repertoire revealed NKG2D activating receptor expression was increased in TFR patients (baseline= 56.8% ± 3.8, 3 mo= 61.4% ± 5.0, 6 mo= 49.9% ± 5.8) vs MolR (baseline= 44.2% ± 3.7, 3 mo= 42.2% ± 5.5, 6 mo= 22.0% ± 8.3, all p=0.02). KIR2DL2/DL3/DS2-positive NK cells were increased in MolR patients at 3 and 6 mo vs TFR. (MolR; 3 mo= 44.8% ± 4.6, 6 mo= 48.8% ± 4.9. TFR; 3 mo= 31.5% ± 4.0 p=0.05, 6 mo= 31.1% ± 2.1, p=0.001). No significant differences were observed in CD56brightCD16-/dim immunoregulatory NK cells, C-type lectin receptor expression (CD94/NKG2A/NKG2C, CD161, CD69), Natural cytotoxicity receptors (NKp30, NKp44, NKp46), CD62L (on T cells and NK cells) and KIR2DL5 expression. No difference in NK Cell-mediated K562 degranulation as a surrogate marker of NK cell function was observed between TFR and MolR patients. Functional CTL immune responses were observed in TFR and MolR patients. BMI-1 CTL responses were increased at baseline in TFR (23%) vs MolR (9%). PR3 CTL responses were not detected in TFR at baseline, 3 mo or 6 mo (0%) vs MolR (baseline= 18%, 3 mo= 50%, 6 mo= 50%). No difference was observed in WT1 or PRAME CTLs. Quantification of immune suppressor cell types revealed decreased Monocytic MDSCs in TFR patients at baseline (10.0% ± 2.3) vs MolR (17.7% ± 3.1, p=0.02). There was no difference in granulocytic MDSCs or Treg between TFR and MolR. No difference in PD-1 expression was observed on NK cells, T cells, B cells and Monocytes. Extensive characterisation of B cell subsets revealed no difference in TFR vs MolR (Table 1). Conclusion: In keeping with STIM and EURO-SKI trials, a threshold level of particular NK cell subsets may be important in maintaining TFR. We found additionally that enhanced NK and CTL effector responses and decreased inhibitory NK KIR2DL2/DL3/DS2 expression, in combination with reduced monocytic MDSC may promote sustained TFR. Methods to enhance nett immune effector responses, such as mature CD56dimCD57+ NK cells and BMI-1 CTL responses or targeting inhibitory KIR may increase TFR success rates. Disclosures White: Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ross:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria. Yong:Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Description: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR Tc) have yielded impressive remission rates in treatment-refractory B-cell malignancies (B-ALL and B-lymphomas) by targeting CD19, resulting in the first FDA approved CAR Tc therapies, Kymriah and Yescarta. However, the translation of these results for other cancer entities remains a challenge. Pre-clinical studies using second-generation CAR Tc against the interleukin-3 receptor alpha chain (CD123) engendered strong anti-leukemic activity. CD123 CAR Tc clinical studies resulted in transient responses, or complete remission but at the expense of on-target off-tumor toxicities. Our studies employing third-generation anti-CD123 CAR Tc demonstrate strong anti-leukemic activity with no adverse effects in vivo. However, the leukemia was not completely eradicated. Combining anti-CD123 CAR Tc with DNA hypomethylating (HMA) agents may enhance the anti-leukemic effect and survival. HMAs such as azacytidine (Aza) activate key epigenetically silenced pathways in AML cells, inhibiting cell proliferation while enhancing cell immunogenicity. We hypothesized that Aza will increase the expression of CD123 on AML cells resulting in long-term disease eradication by anti-CD123 CAR Tc. The anti-leukemic efficacy, survival advantage, safety and feasibility of the combination treatment with Aza and anti-CD123 CAR Tc were evaluated in vivo. HL-60 (CD123med), MLL-2 (CD123lo), MOLM-13 (CD123hi), primary de novo and relapsed/refractory (r/r) AML cells were cultured for 0-8 days in the presence of Aza (0µM-5µM) and analysed for their CD123 expression by flow cytometry, quantitative western blot and RNAseq. The anti-CD123 CAR was constructed with the humanized CSL362-based ScFv and the CD28-OX40-CD3ζ signaling domain, encoded in a third-generation lentiviral vector and expressed in CD3+ Tc from healthy donors. Rag2γc-/- mice (n=12-16/ group) were engrafted with 1x105 MOLM13/ffLuc AML cells and treated with PBS, 5x106 Non-transduced (NTD) Tc orCAR Tc, 4x 2.5mg/kg Aza, or 5x106 CAR Tc following 4x Aza (2.5mg/kg). Leukemic burden was assessed weekly by bioluminescence imaging. Tc activity and immunophenotyping was performed using flow cytometry at day 35 post engraftment, and survival was monitored. HL-60, MLL-2 and MOLM-13 cells showed significant increases in HLA-DR, PD-L1, STAT1 and IRF7 expression, as well as CD123 when exposed to Aza (Fig 1A,B). Interestingly, the increased effect was seen from day one regardless of concentration. This was similarly reflected in AML patient cells. Aza treatment also arrested cell proliferation and decreased viability in both cell lines and patient cells suggesting Aza can aid in the anti-leukemic effect. Rag2γc-/- mice engrafted with MOLM-13 and treated with Aza and CD123 CAR Tc demonstrated suppressed growth, and eradication of MOLM-13 cells compared to mice treated with CD123 CAR Tc or Aza alone. Additionally, a significant decrease in residual CD123+ cells in the bone marrow (BM) of dual treated mice was seen (Fig 1C). A higher frequency of residual CD8+ T-cells in the BM, and CD4+ Tc in the peripheral blood (PB) and BM of dual treated mice was observed compared to CAR Tc only treated mice. Most prominently, we found a significantly higher mean number of stem cell-like and central memory CD8+ Tc in the BM of dual treated mice (232 cells/µl and 208cells/µl, respectively) compared to the CAR Tc only group (55 cells/µl and 23 cells/µl, respectively). Assessment of immune checkpoint markers on residual CAR Tc of dual treated mice revealed significantly decreased levels of CTLA-4, PD-1 and TIM-3 in the BM, and CTLA-4 in the PB compared to the CAR Tc only group. While CAR Tc treatment alone demonstrated a survival advantage compared to PBS, NTD or Aza treated mice, Aza and CAR Tc treatment had a significantly higher survival rate compared to the CAR Tc only group (92% vs. 46% at day 50, p