ALBERT

Notes: Relationships between spermatozoal design and swimming behaviour were investigated using the significant natural variance in sperm traits in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. In vitro motility and fertilization experiments were conducted with 86 Atlantic salmon to measure sperm form and function under natural fertilization conditions. Spermatozoal traits of Atlantic salmon showed narrow variance within individuals but differed extensively between samples: mean sperm length varied from 32·3 to 39·5 μm, mean velocity ranged from 18 to 127 μm s−1, and ejaculate longevity varied from 18 to 78 s. In addition to variation in sperm morphometry between fish, a negative relationship was also found between sperm head length and flagellum length. This natural variation in sperm form and function between males is counter-intuitive since measures are from a single Atlantic salmon population where all males are adapted to a common fertilization environment. No evidence was found that longer sperm, or sperm with longer flagella, achieved faster swimming velocities. Also no evidence was found for a trade-off between mean sperm velocity and ejaculate longevity. There were significant negative associations, however, between sperm total and flagellum length and ejaculate longevity, so that males with longer sperm had shorter-lived gametes. This finding has previously been reported in a study across fish species, supporting the theory that increased hydrostatic forces generated by longer flagella may trade against sperm cell longevity.

Notes: This study sampled sperm from wild Atlantic salmon to explore relationships between sperm form and function. Detailed measurements of sperm morphometry (head, flagellum and total length) and sperm activity (longevity and % motility) were made from 24 reproductively active males (13 anadromous and 11 mature parr) on two occasions post-stripping. There was significant between-male variance in total sperm length but this variance was not related to body size. Despite this variance in sperm length, no relationships were found between a male's sperm activity (longevity or % motility) and his sperm length. There were also no relationships between sperm head length and flagellar length, and no evidence for a trade-off between sperm length and numbers. It is suggested that the significant between-male variance in sperm morphometry supports diploid control of spermatogenesis: haploid expression of sperm phenotype would be manifested as profound variance within (and not between) each male's spermatozoal characteristics.

Notes: Life history strategy models in which female size depends on fecundity and male size on male-male competition, are used to predict male and female size. Sperm competition alone—without any form of contest competition—cannot readily generate size ratios (male weight/female weight) greater than 1·0, and if sperm competition is very weak, small or even dwarf males are predicted. Increasing sperm competition increases male size, but only with high numbers of competing males can male size approach that of females. Size dimorphism is also affected by the ratio: growth rate/mortality rate in each sex. If this is higher in one sex, its size increases. Two trade-offs in fish could affect this ratio but neither appears likely to yield size ratios above unity under sperm competition.Male-male combat is capable of pushing male size beyond that of females, but male size seems never to exceed female size by more than one order of ten, whilst the reverse can proceed to many orders of ten (dwarf males), a pattern which applies generally in animals. Reasons for this asymmetry in size ratio include buffering effects of reducing growth rate (‘von Bertalanffy buffering’), and an asymmetry in the homeostatic effect of operational sex ratio (‘OSR buffering’). High adult male mortality and weak male-male competition can generate dwarf males. A fundamental problem concerns why the sexes are often so similar in size: this may relate to sperm competition, size buffering effects, and many other features not considered in the present models.

Notes: Summary Sexual reproduction is a composite, not a singular, phenomenon and as such can be subdivided into a number of componentsi.e. fusion, recombination, fission, and the male-female phenomenon. These components can evolve independently, though any evolutionary change in one component is likely to influence the future evolution of the other components. The ambiguity that surrounds the term ‘sex’ due to a failure to recognise the composite nature of sexual reproduction has led to considerable confusion in past discussions of the evolution of the phenomenon. This paper considers the possible chronological interaction of the components of sexual reproduction both with each other and with the sequence of selective pressures that seem likely to have acted. This chronological approach is used to consider: the origin of sexual reproduction; the evolution of sexual reproduction in the common ancestor of the procaryotes and eucaryotes; the modification of the ancestral system in the procaryote line following the procaryote-eucaryote dichotomy; and the modification of the ancestral system in the eucaryote line up to the origin of the male-female phenomenon. It is suggested that the fusion and recombination of the first living organisms were chronological continuations of the fusion and recombination of complex organic molecules that led up to the origin of life. The evolution of the third major component of sexual reproductioni.e. fission (replication), by definition coincided with the origin of life. Initial selection on the components of sexual reproduction are likely to have been related to the optimum manifestations of size, complexity, diversity, multiplication, and distribution. Resultant early evolutionary trends are likely to have been: selective fusion between more-similar organisms; increase in number of fissions per fusion; and less recombination. The procaryote-eucaryote dichotomy is argued to have evolved in response to the increasing cellular problems of packing and replicating an increasing amount of hereditary material. The evolution of a single circular hereditary organelle in the procaryote line is argued to have led to the loss of total fusion and the specialisation of individuals into either donors or recipients. The donor-recipient phenomenon of procaryotes is directly analogous to the male-female phenomenon of eucaryotes and leads to parallel evolution due to sexual selection in both groups. In the eucaryote line the ancestral mechanism of sexual reproduction is argued to have persisted through, but to have been greatly modified by, the evolution of complex machinery (mitotic/meiotic) for the handling of multiple hereditary organelles at cell division and reduction division. The evolutionary modification of the ancestral system of sexual reproduction is suggested to have led in eucaryotes to the evolution of: the species phenomenon; allelic recombination; and the male-female phenomenon.