ISSN:
1432-1939
Keywords:
Canada Goose
;
Digestion
;
Foraging
;
Grazing
;
Tundra
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
Summary Time spent foraging (and in other activities), rate of pecking at food items and length of foraging and nonforaging periods were studied in cackling Canada goose (Branta canadensis minima) goslings during brood-rearing on the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, Alaska in 1978 and 1979. Brood density on the study area was twice as high in 1978 (23 broods) as in 1979 (12 broods) owing in part to annual variation in nesting density and success. Peck-rates were lower in meadows during 1978 than in 1979. There was no between-year difference in time spent foraging prior to the adult molt (59% of daylight hours) but during molt, goslings spent more time feeding in 1978 (70%) than in 1979 (56%). Prior to the adult molt, 12.2 and 11.9 hours were spent feeding each day in 1978 and 1979 respectively, whereas goslings fed for 13.4 and 10.6 hours daily, in the two years during molting and fledging. Increased foraging time during the molt in 1978 completely compensated for lower peck rates so that total number of pecks per day during this period were similar in 1978 (62,800 pecks/d) and 1979 (57,900 pecks/d). Elsewhere, we reported that cackling geese significantly reduced the availability of their preferred food in 1979 and this food comprised a smaller proportion of the diet in 1978 than 1979. This variation in diet suggests that preferred foods were less available at higher brood densities, resulting in annual variation in foraging behavior. Lengths of foraging periods increased during brood-rearing in both years but were longer on average in 1978. There was no seasonal or between year variation in the length of nonforaging periods. The alternating pattern of foraging and nonforaging periods suggests that rate of processing limits rate of food intake because a relatively constant period of time was regularly required to empty the esophagus before foraging could be resumed. The restriction of food intake by digestive processes increased the importance of dietary nutrient concentrations because low nutrient concentrations could not be compensated for by higher rates of food intake.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00378824
Permalink
