ISSN:
1572-9680
Keywords:
pine
;
pasture
;
cattle
;
integrated management
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
Notes:
Abstract Native forages of southern United States are frequently low in nutrients and poorly digestible, while improved pastures are the opposite. Since this area produces rapid growth of pines, which is a major use of the land, the integration of pines, pastures, and cattle seem to offer an efficient and economical form of management. Therefore, in a 20-year study Coastal bermuda (Cynodon dactylon), dallis (Paspalum dilatatum), and Pensacola bahia (P. notatum) grasses were grown in pastures with no trees, and with slash pine (Pinus elliottii) spaced 3.7 x 3.7 and 6.1 x 6.1 m. The trees were grown free of competition for 3 years, grasses were established during the 4th year, and grazing by yearling cattle began the 5th year. The pastures were then fertilized, grazed, and burned for 15 years. Increasing tree canopies reduced forage production of all grasses. Bahiagrass was the most shade tolerant, while Coastal bermuda was the least. Liveweight gains during the 15 years of grazing totaled 3933, 2302, and 1518 kg/ha from pastures with no pines and slash pine spaced 6.1 x 6.1 and 3.7 x 3.7, respectively. Survival of slash pine was low due to heavy attacks by southern pine coneworm and southern fusiform rust. However, the trees grew rapidly and averaged 19.0 and 16.9 m in height, 30.0 and 33.3 cm in diameter, and 181.4 and 90.7 m3/ha of pulpwood after 20 years from the 3.7 x 3.7 and 6.1 x 6.1 spacings, respectively. Slash pine at these spacings planted in undisturbed, native vegetation were 16.0 and 15.7 m tall, 19.6 and 23.4 cm in diameter, and produced 145.5 and 63.6 m3/ha of pulpwood. Combining the production of pines and beef on improved pasture offers an opportunity for multiple-product yields. Since this approach to agroforestry is not trouble-free, good management is required. Landowners, especially those with small holdings, should consider these alternatives to single-product management when planning their cropping system.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00155936
Permalink
