ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Periplaneta americana  (1)
  • Rostrum  (1)
  • Models, Biological
  • 1990-1994  (2)
Collection
Publisher
Years
Year
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of comparative physiology 172 (1993), S. 359-368 
    ISSN: 1432-1351
    Keywords: Acetylcholine receptors ; Muscarinic ; Nicotinic ; Cockroach ; Periplaneta americana
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Notes: Abstract The effects of a number of cholinergic agonists and antagonists have been examined on the cell body of the fast coxal depressor (Df) of the cockroach Periplaneta americana using voltage-clamp techniques. Acetylcholine (ACh), when applied to this neurone voltage-clamped at its normal resting potential, results in the generation of an inward current through the activation of receptors which are blocked by α-bungarotoxin (α-bgt). At more depolarized membrane potentials acetylcholine induces an inward current which is strongly voltage-dependent and which is insensitive to α-bgt. An α-bgt-resistant current is also induced by the application of a number of cholinergic agonists. In order of potency these are: decamethonium〉oxotremorine = McN-A-343 = (+)-muscarine = arecaidine propargyl ester 〉nicotine 〉ACh. This α-bgt-resistant response to cholinergic agonists is blocked by a range of antagonists. In order of potency these are : decamethonium 〉pirenzipine 〉quinuclidinyl benzilate = atropine = p-f-hexahydro-sila-difenidol = dexetimide 〉scopolamine = methoctramine. The receptors mediating this response have been termed ‘mixed cholinergic’ due to their sensitivity to both nicotinic and muscarinic ligands. Pharmacological similarities between these ‘mixed’ receptors and binding components found in high speed supernatant fractions of insect nervous tissue are discussed.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-5133
    Keywords: Fish aggregation devices ; FADs ; Rostrum ; Spearing
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology
    Notes: Synopsis Billfishes have long been known to impale a great variety of objects, but there are only two brief, obscure records of marine turtles being speared. Details are presented on these two, as well as on two other confirmed records; data from two additional unconfirmed records are also presented. In total, three species of marine turtles are known to have been impaled by three species of billfishes; a fourth species of fish and a fourth species turtle are listed in an unconfirmed case. Records come from the eastern and western Pacific as well as the eastern Atlantic. Of the four confirmed cases, the turtles survived in two, and apparently died as an effect of the spearing in the other two. In three confirmed cases only the impaled rostrum was encountered, and in one confirmed case the entire fish was found, with its rostrum piercing the turtle. There is no obvious advantage — or clear disadvantage — involved in impaling turtles. It is argued that these attacks are accidental, and the result of attempts made by the billfish to capture prey that are near the turtle. These spearings indicate that the chelonians serve as shelters for prey animals on the high seas, and thus, are further evidence of the pelagic existence of marine turtles. The impalings are evidence of a singular ecological role of the turtles — as live fish aggregation devices.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...