ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • Drosophila  (2)
  • Springer  (2)
  • American Geophysical Union
  • Cell Press
  • MDPI
  • Wiley
  • 1990-1994  (2)
  • 1935-1939
Collection
Publisher
  • Springer  (2)
  • American Geophysical Union
  • Cell Press
  • MDPI
  • Wiley
Years
  • 1990-1994  (2)
  • 1935-1939
Year
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Biochemical genetics 31 (1993), S. 61-74 
    ISSN: 1573-4927
    Keywords: isofemale ; allele frequency estimation ; population structure ; allozyme ; microsatellites ; restriction fragment length polymorphisms ; Drosophila
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract Isofemale lines are commonly used inDrosophila and other genera for the purpose of assaying genetic variation. Isofemale lines can be kept in the laboratory for many generations before genetic work is carried out, and permit the confirmation of newly discovered alleles. A problem not realized by many workers is that the commonly used estimate of allele frequency from these lines is biased. This estimation bias occurs at all times after the first laboratory generation, regardless of whether single individuals or pooled samples are used in each well of an electrophoretic gel. This bias can potentially affect the estimation of population genetic parameters, and in the case of rare allele analysis it can cause gross overestimates of gene flow. This paper provides a correction for allele frequency estimates derived from isofemale lines for any time after the lines are established in the laboratory. When pooled samples are used, this estimator performs better than the standard estimator at all times after the first generation. The estimator is also insensitive to multiple inseminations. After the lines have drifted oneN e generations, multiple inseminations actually make the new estimator perform better than it does in singly inseminated females. Simulations show that estimates made using either estimator after the lines have drifted to fixation have a much greater error associated with their use than do those estimates made earlier in time using the correction. In general it is better to use corrected estimates of gene frequency soon after lines are established than to use uncorrected estimates made after the first laboratory generation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Biochemical genetics 31 (1993), S. 61-74 
    ISSN: 1573-4927
    Keywords: isofemale ; allele frequency estimation ; population structure ; allozyme ; microsatellites ; restriction fragment length polymorphisms ; Drosophila
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract Isofemale lines are commonly used inDrosophila and other genera for the purpose of assaying genetic variation. Isofemale lines can be kept in the laboratory for many generations before genetic work is carried out, and permit the confirmation of newly discovered alleles. A problem not realized by many workers is that the commonly used estimate of allele frequency from these lines is biased. This estimation bias occurs at all times after the first laboratory generation, regardless of whether single individuals or pooled samples are used in each well of an electrophoretic gel. This bias can potentially affect the estimation of population genetic parameters, and in the case of rare allele analysis it can cause gross overestimates of gene flow. This paper provides a correction for allele frequency estimates derived from isofemale lines for any time after the lines are established in the laboratory. When pooled samples are used, this estimator performs better than the standard estimator at all times after the first generation. The estimator is also insensitive to multiple inseminations. After the lines have drifted oneN e generations, multiple inseminations actually make the new estimator perform better than it does in singly inseminated females. Simulations show that estimates made using either estimator after the lines have drifted to fixation have a much greater error associated with their use than do those estimates made earlier in time using the correction. In general it is better to use corrected estimates of gene frequency soon after lines are established than to use uncorrected estimates made after the first laboratory generation.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...