ISSN:
1573-5125
Keywords:
bivalves
;
ecosystems
;
carrying capacity
;
turnover time
;
mussels
;
oysters
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
Abstract The carrying capacity of suspension feeding bivalvesin 11 coastal and estuarine ecosystems is examined. Bivalve carrying capacity is defined in terms of watermass residence time, primary production time andbivalve clearance time. Turnover times for the 11ecosystems are compared both two and threedimensionally. Fast systems, e.g., Sylt and NorthInlet, have turnover times of days or less, while,slow systems, e.g., Delaware Bay, have turnover timesof months and years. Some systems,Marennes-Oléron, South San Francisco Bay and NorthInlet, require a net influx of phytoplankton in orderto support their bivalve populations. Three systems,Carlingford Lough, Chesapeake Bay and Delaware Bay,have very long bivalve clearance times due to small orreduced bivalve filter feeder populations. Carlingford Lough stands out because it is a naturallyplanktonic system now being converted to bivalveculture with an adherently stronger benthic-pelagiccoupling. Existing models of bivalve carrying capacity arereviewed. The Herman model is utilized as anappropriate ecosystem level model to examine carryingcapacity because it includes the three major turnovertime elements of water mass residence time, primaryproduction time and bivalve filter feeder clearancetime. The graphical analysis suggests that massive andsuccessful bivalve filter feeder populations are foundin systems with relatively short residence times(〈40 days) and short primary production times (〈4days) in order to sustain a high bivalve biomass withits associated rapid clearance times. Outliersystems are constrained by long water mass residencetimes, extended primary production times, and longclearance times.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009997011583
Permalink
