ISSN:
1573-5052
Keywords:
Continentality index
;
Fagus sylvatica
;
Quercus ilex
;
Quercus pubescens
;
Quercus suber
;
Root hydraulic efficiency
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
Notes:
Abstract This paper deals with the possibility of relating root hydraulic parameters to an ecological index describing the continentality/oceanicity of four forest trees. Root hydraulic conductance ($K_R$) of seedlings of Fagus sylvatica L., Quercus ilex L., Quercus suber L. and Quercus pubescens Willd. was measured in May, August and November 1996. $K_R$ was calculated in terms of the relation of the water flow through intact root systems in situ measured with the pressure chamber, and the pressure driving the flow. The sufficiency of the root system to supply the foliage was estimated by dividing $K_R$ by the seedlings leaf surface area ($A_L$) thus obtaining $K_RL$. In the spring, $K_RL$ was largest in F. sylvatica and smallest in Q. pubescens with intermediate values recorded in Q. ilex and Q. suber. All the species studied showed a large decline in $K_RL$ just prior to the winter rest except for Q. suber which mantained $K_RL$ approximately constant through the period of study. In most cases, $K_RL$ changed in accordance with analogous changes in the flow. When the total seedlings' leaf surface area ($A_L$) was plotted versus $K_RL$, it appeared that $K_RL$ of Q. pubescens increased with $A_L$, proportionally, while $K_RL$ of F. sylvatica was inversely related to $A_L$. This, together with the largest $K_RL$ recorded in the summer in Q. pubescens, was interpreted as advantageous to this species (which is adapted to semi-arid environments) in that: (a) roots could supply water to foliage efficiently even during the adverse season and (b) the foliage growth could be sustained even in summer. No statistically significant relation of $K_RL$ to the continentality index calculated for the four species studied on the basis of their European distribution, was found to exist. Nonetheless, our data appear to be encouraging for future research aimed at better interpreting the typical distribution areas of plant species.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009746303211
Permalink