ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2000-2004  (5)
  • 1
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    [S.l.] : American Institute of Physics (AIP)
    Review of Scientific Instruments 71 (2000), S. 4149-4154 
    ISSN: 1089-7623
    Source: AIP Digital Archive
    Topics: Physics , Electrical Engineering, Measurement and Control Technology
    Notes: Imaging by solid-state array sensors has become an indispensable tool in various modern scientific and engineering applications. In such instrumentation, a linear response of the sensor output to the incident light intensity is often very much desirable. The system linearity can be affected by both the sensing element and electronics. The linearity also needs to be accurately determined in order to assess and correct measurement errors. Some imaging systems, especially those of upper grade with high resolution, allow precise control of exposure time. If so, it is easy to check the linearity in response to the incident energy with changes of exposure time under a constant intensity of illuminating light. For imaging systems without precise time control, especially those of intermediate- or lower-grade, it is highly desirable to have some means for assessing linearity and applying corrections to improve accuracy for photometric uses. Here, we present two simple approaches, one for quickly checking linearity and the other for correcting the response, for those imaging systems without exact exposure-time control. The former allows a quick assessment of the linearity while the latter permits an accurate calibration with minimal hardware preparation. In initial testing, the calibration method works well with an intermediate-grade sensor interfaced to a frame grabber. The nonlinearity of the imaging system tested can be reduced from about 5.1% to much less than 1% in standard deviation. © 2000 American Institute of Physics.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2000-01-01
    Print ISSN: 0034-6748
    Electronic ISSN: 1089-7623
    Topics: Electrical Engineering, Measurement and Control Technology , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Description: Solid State array sensors are ubiquitous nowadays for obtaining gross field images in numerous scientific and engineering applications including optical diagnostics and instrumentation. Linear responses of these sensors are often required as in interferometry, light scattering and attenuation measurements, and photometry. In most applications, the linearity is usually taken to be granted without thorough quantitative assessment or correction through calibration. Upper-grade CCD cameras of high price may offer better linearity: however, they also require linearity checking and correction if necessary. Intermediate- or low-grade CCD cameras are more likely to need calibration for linearity . Here, we present two very simple approaches: one for quickly checking camera linearity without any additional setup and one for precisely correcting nonlinear sensor responses. It is believed that after calibration, those sensors of intermediate or low grade can function as effectively as their expensive counterpart.
    Keywords: Optics
    Type: SPIE International Symposium; Jul 30, 2001; San Diego, CA; United States
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Description: A great number of crystals (semi-conductor and protein) grown in space are plagued by convective motions which contribute to structural flaws. The character of these instabilities is not well understood but is associated with density variations in the presence of residual gravity and g-jitter. Both static and dynamic (rotating or travelling wave) magnetic fields can be used to reduce the effects of convection in materials processing. In semi-conductor melts, due to their relatively high electrical conductivity, the induced Lorentz force can be effectively used to curtail convective effects. In melts/solutions with reduced electrical conductivity, such as aqueous solutions used in solution crystal growth, protein crystal growth and/or model fluid experiments for simulating melt growth, however, the variation of the magnetic susceptibility with temperature and/or concentration can be utilized to better damp fluid convection than the Lorentz force method. This paper presents a comprehensive, comparative numerical study of the relative damping effects using static magnetic fields and gradients in a simple geometry subjected to a thermal gradient. The governing equations are formulated in general terms and then simplified for the numerical calculations. Operational regimes, based on the best damping technique for different melts/solutions are identified based on fluid properties. Comparisons are provided between the numerical results and available results from experiments in surveyed literature.
    Keywords: Solid-State Physics
    Type: ITAM Conference; Aug 27, 2000; Chicago, IL; United States
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Description: Solid-state array imaging has become an indispensable tool for various modem scientific instrumentation and industrial applications. Often in experiments, use of an imaging system with linear response is very desirable. The linearity of commercial products, however, has yet to be accurately determined in order to assess their nonlinearity effects. Linearity is affected both by sensors and electronics. It is also very desirables to employ low-cost products if we can provide the performance comparable of expensive ones through calibration. Here, we present a very simple approach for approximately checking linearity of imaging systems and also a simple calibration method for precisely measuring intensity ratio or relative intensity variation. These methods can be readily implemented with existing equipment. The calibration method works well with an intermediate-grade analog sensor interfaced by a frame grabber. In our initial attempt for calibration, the nonlinearity of the camera can be reduced from about five percent to much less than one percent in standard deviation.
    Keywords: Instrumentation and Photography
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...