Electronic Resource
Springer
Journal of automated reasoning
24 (2000), S. 397-420
ISSN:
1573-0670
Keywords:
SAT
;
worst-case upper bounds
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Computer Science
Notes:
Abstract In 1980 Monien and Speckenmeyer proved that satisfiability of a propositional formula consisting of K clauses (of arbitrary length) can be checked in time of the order 2 K / 3. Recently Kullmann and Luckhardt proved the worst-case upper bound 2 L / 9, where L is the length of the input formula. The algorithms leading to these bounds are based on the splitting method, which goes back to the Davis–Putnam procedure. Transformation rules (pure literal elimination, unit propagation, etc.) constitute a substantial part of this method. In this paper we present a new transformation rule and two algorithms using this rule. We prove that these algorithms have the worst-case upper bounds 20. 30897 K and 20. 10299 L , respectively.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006340920104
Permalink
|
Location |
Call Number |
Expected |
Availability |