ALBERT

Description: Background: Bortezomib (Bz, VELCADE®) is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in clinical trials. In a large randomized phase 3 trial, Bz achieved superior response rates (RR), TTP, and survival compared with high-dose dexamethasone in relapsed MM pts after 1–3 prior therapies. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) has been dose limiting, especially in pts with pre-existing PN. The objective of this multicenter phase 2 trial was to evaluate the activity and safety of Bz as monotherapy in previously untreated MM pts and prospectively examine PN at baseline (BL) and across treatment. Methods: Pts received Bz 1.3 mg/m2 on d 1, 4, 8, 11 of a 21-d cycle, with RR (CR + PR; EBMT) assessed every 2 cycles. Eligible pts had symptomatic MM with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy. Concomitant steroids (〉 10 mg/d), plt count 〈 30 x 109/L within 14 d of enrollment or 〉 grade (G) 2 PN were exclusion criteria. RR, TTP, safety and incidence/severity of PN were evaluated. The effect on PN of dose modification (DM) and supplements with specified interventions for symptoms was assessed. Neurologic evaluation involving a pt questionnaire and neurologist’s exam was performed before and after treatment. A 33 pt subset had BL nerve conduction studies (NCS), quantitative sensory testing (QST), autonomic testing, and skin biopsy for quantitation of small-diameter neurite densities (ND). Toxicities were assessed by NCI-CTC, v3.0. Results: 63 pts (median age 60 y) have been treated. Data are available for 50 pts; 27 pts had IgG kappa MM and 21 pts had stage III disease. BL small-fiber neuropathy (SFN; normal NCS but abnormal QST or autonomic studies) was seen in 16/33 pts (48%). BL skin biopsy showed that 18/30 pts (60%) had small-fiber ND at the 15th percentile of age-adjusted norms; global mean density was at the 23rd percentile. NCS revealed BL axonal PN in 3/33 pts (9%). Among 46 pts evaluable for response, best response after ≥ 2 cycles was CR in 5 pts (11%) and PR in 9 pts (20%) for a RR of 30%. 13 pts (28%) achieved MR, 17 (37%) had SD, and 2 had PD (4%). The most common adverse events were PN, fatigue and rash. 24 pts (48%) developed PN, including 18 with G1 and 5 with G2. One pt had G3 PN and was discontinued. DM (dose reduction or discontinuation) was required in 9 pts. 23 pts have been studied after treatment. New large-fiber neuropathy (LFN) was seen in 4/23 pts (17%) and new SFN in 8 pts. Of 3 pts with BL LFN, 1 was not restudied, 1 had worsening SFN and 1 was unchanged. Small-fiber neurite counts were increased to the 35th percentile. Of 16 pts with BL SFN, 7 had worsening SFN (by QST). Bz was otherwise generally well tolerated. Conclusion: Bz as monotherapy has shown activity in newly diagnosed MM pts, with a CR of 11% and manageable toxicity. Underlying SFN appears more common in MM than appreciated. Treatment-emergent ≥ G2 PN was observed in 12% of pts and was G3 in 1 pt. Assessment of PN, the effect of interventions and skin biopsy analyses are ongoing.

Description: Background: Patients with severe and prolonged neutropenia are at high-risk of developing life-threatening IFIs. Despite current treatment option, IFIs are difficult to treat and frequently associated with high mortality rates. Antifungal prophylaxis has shown benefits in high-risk populations and is a standard practice in many institutions. We compared Posaconazole (POS), a new broad-spectrum triazole, vs Standard Azoles for the prevention of IFIs in patients with a new diagnosis or first relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) being treated with intensive chemotherapy. Methods: Patients in this randomized, evaluator-blinded, active controlled, multi-center study received oral POS (200mg tid) or oral Standard Azoles (either Fluconazole [FLU 400mg qd] or Itraconazole solution [ITRA 200mg bid]) with each cycle of chemotherapy until complete remission or for up to a maximum of 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the comparison of the incidence of IFIs during the treatment phase (7 days after last dose) as adjudicated by the blinded expert panel based on EORTC/MSG criteria. The incidence of IFIs 100 days after randomization and the clinical outcome at the end of the treatment phase were also compared. Treatment failure was defined as presence of proven or probable IFIs, use of 〉3 days of empirical systemic antifungal treatment, use of 〉3 consecutive days or a total of 10 or more days of IV study drug (or alternative formulation for POS), discontinuation due to an adverse event related to study drug or lost to follow-up during treatment. Results: 602 patients were enrolled (304 POS, 298 Standard Azole [240 FLU, 58 ITRA]). The incidence of proven/probable IFIs was lower with POS prophylaxis (see table). The overall mortality was 49 (16%) vs 67 (22%) for patients in the POS and Standard Azoles arms respectively. Analysis of time to death (all cause mortality) within 100 days post randomization yielded a P-value of 0.035, indicating a significant survival benefit in favor of POS. Twenty-one (21) deaths due to IFIs occurred during the study (POS 5, Standard Azoles 16, P = 0.012). Treatment failures were fewer in the POS arm vs Standard Azoles arm (36% vs 46%, P = 0.0091). Safety and tolerability were comparable. Conclusions: In this study, POS was superior to the use of a Standard Azoles (FLU or ITRA) in preventing IFIs and in preventing aspergillosis, in high-risk neutropenic patients with AML or MDS undergoing intensive chemotherapy. Patients receiving POS experienced a significant survival benefit. POS N=304 FLU/ITRA N=298 Proven/Probable IFIs n (%) n (%) P-value All IFIs during Treatment Phase 7 (2) 25 (8) 0.0009 Aspergillus during Treatment Phase 2 (1) 20 (7) 0.0001 All IFIs within 100 days post-randomization 14 (5) 33 (11) 0.0031

Description: Seven patients with hematologic malignancy refractory to conventional therapy were treated with 1000 rads midpoint tissue dose of whole-body irradiation followed by infusion of marrow from an HL-A matched sibling. Three patients with advanced leukemia showed histologic evidence suggestive of engraftment but the graft did not function and they died after 18, 26, and 30 days. Four patients, three with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and one with Hodgkin’s disease, treated while in good clinical condition, showed evidence of a functioning marrow graft within 3 wk. Engraftment was proved by cytogenetic analysis in three cases with donors of the opposite sex. One patient died with graft-vs.-host disease (GVH) after 37 days. The other three had mild to moderate GVH. Two patients showed recurrent leukemia and died after 85 and 102 days. In one of these patients, a girl, the recurrent leukemia was in male donor cells. One patient, a boy, is alive and well after 200 days with only female donor cells in the marrow. He shows no evidence of GVH and, as yet, no leukemia.

Description: Introduction: Bortezomib (Bz, VELCADE) is a proteasome inhibitor proven safe and effective for patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Pts in SUMMIT (NEJM2003;348:2609) and CREST (BJH2004;127:165) underwent rigorous testing (neurologic evaluations, FACT/GOG-Ntx questionnaires, nerve conduction studies) to determine the incidence, characteristics and reversibility of PN. In these phase 2 trials, the PN rate was 31–41% (grade [G] ≥ 3 in 11–12%). Specific dose modification (DM) guidelines for PN were not incorporated into the phase 2 trials but were developed for subsequent studies. The objective of this report was to evaluate the frequency, characteristics and reversibility of PN in an updated analysis of the randomized phase 3 APEX trial (NEJM2005;352:2487), in which specific DM guidelines for PN were implemented. Methods: Pts with relapsed MM were randomized to Bz 1.3 mg/m2 IV on d 1, 4, 8, 11 q3wk for 8 cycles then 3 cycles on d 1, 8, 15, 22 q5wk, or dexamethasone (Dex) 40 mg PO on d 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 q5wk for 4 cycles, then 5 cycles on d 1–4 q4wk. Pts with G ≥ 2 PN were excluded. Data were collected on incidence, severity and reversibility of PN. Results: Of 331 pts safety evaluable enrolled on Bz, 120 (36%) developed PN, including 30 (9%) with G ≥ 3. PN was classified as sensory or not specified in the vast majority of cases; motor neuropathies were rare. Of 91 pts with G ≥ 2 PN, 68 had DM, including 37 with doses reduced, held or schedule modification and 31 with Bz discontinuation (DC); 23 pts not following DM protocol. The majority (58 pts; 64%) of the 91 pts improved (9%) or had complete resolution (55%) of symptoms. Of 37 pts with DM without Bz DC, the majority (26 pts; 70%) had improvement, all with complete resolution of PN to baseline, with a median time to resolution of 78 d. Of 31 pts requiring Bz DC, 2 (6%) improved and 17 (55%) had complete resolution of PN with a median time to improvement/resolution of 121 d. Of 23 pts who did not follow the DM protocol, 12 (52%) had complete resolution with a median time to resolution of 106 d. The rates of PN (any G, G ≥ 3) were similar regardless of pt age or number/type of prior therapies (Table). The median TTP of 91 pts with G ≥ 2 PN, 68 pts with DM, and the Bz arm overall were 6.2, 6.9 and 6.2 months, respectively. Conclusion: The overall rate of PN in APEX was similar to that of SUMMIT and CREST, but the rate of G ≥ 3 PN was lower, perhaps because of specific DM guidelines. PN was reversible in the majority of pts, and DM did not compromise efficacy. Pt age or number/type of prior therapies did not appear to affect the rate or severity of PN. PN Bz Subgroup Any G*, % G ≥3, % *Bz related ge; 65 y 35 9 〈 65 y 37 9 〉 1 prior therapy 36 10 1 prior therapy 37 8 Steroids 38 7 Alkylating agent 35 7 Anthracycline 39 7 Vinca alkaloid 38 8 Thalidomide 44 8 Transplantation 37 7

Description: Introduction: In the international, multicenter phase 3 APEX trial, 669 patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) who had relapsed after 1–3 prior therapies were randomized to receive bortezomib (VELCADE®) 1.3 mg/m2 IV d 1, 4, 8, 11 q3wk for 8 cycles followed by 3 cycles on d 1, 8, 15, 22 q5wk, or dexamethasone (Dex) 40 mg PO d 1–4, 9–12, 17–20 q5wk for 4 cycles followed by 5 cycles on d 1–4 q4wk. Pts refractory to Dex were excluded, and those with progressive disease on Dex were eligible to cross over to bortezomib. Pts receiving bortezomib achieved significant improvement in time to progression (TTP, primary end point), response rate (CR + PR using EBMT criteria), and survival (Richardson. NEJM.2005;352:2487), which resulted in early closure of the trial. The duration of response (DOR) was longer with bortezomib, and infections ≥ grade 3, time to skeletal events, grade 4 adverse events (AE), serious AE, and discontinuations due to AE were similar in the 2 treatment arms. Methods: In this analysis, updated response rates, time to response (TTR), DOR, survival, and TTP are presented after extended follow-up. A matched-pairs analysis comparing survival and TTP of pts on bortezomib in APEX with those in another trial of MM pts who received bortezomib after Dex will also be presented. Results: 669 pts received a median of 7 cycles of therapy. Based on a median follow-up of 15.8 months, the median TTP, 1-year and overall survival (OS), response rates, median TTR, and median DOR for pts receiving bortezomib are shown in the table. Median duration of therapy for responders (CR + PR) was 7.2 months. Improved response with longer therapy (after cycle 6) was observed in 76 pts (56% of responders) in the bortezomib arm (20 pts improved from MR or PR to CR, and 56 pts improved from MR to PR). Furthermore, 28 of 135 responders (21%) achieved first response (CR/PR) after cycle 4, including 18 pts (13%) on or after cycle 6, and 10 pts (7%) on or after cycle 8. OS increased substantially with more follow-up. Median TTR was more rapid, and median DOR was longer in pts achieving CR and near CR than in those with PR. Conclusion: Updated TTP, response rates, survival, TTR, and DOR for the bortezomib group continue to support the findings of the original analysis. Thus, the clinical benefits of single-agent bortezomib in pts with relapsed MM remain robust after extended follow-up, supporting its early use in relapsed MM and its further study in the treatment of newly diagnosed disease. Efficacy Bortezomib (n = 333) Median TTP, mo 6.2 1-year survival, % 80 Median OS, mo 25.4 Response rate, % (n/N) 43 (135/315) CR 9 (27/315) PR 34 (108/315) -near CR 7 (21/315) Median TTR, mo (range) 1.4 (0.5–6.0) CR 0.8 (0.5–4.0) PR 1.4 (0.5–6.0) -near CR 0.8 (0.6–2.4) Median DOR, mo 7.8 CR 9.9 PR 7.6 -near CR 11.5