ALBERT

Description: Abstract 2873 International staging system (ISS) and cytogenetics are the main prognostic factors of Multiple Myeloma (MM) but they reflect biologic characteristics of disease without taking into account individual host features. On the contrary, clinical characteristics of single patient could be substantial as to various points of view. For instance, in elderly MM patients, novel therapies reduction or interruption due to toxicity represent the major cause of unsatisfactory outcome. Therefore, it was empirically suggested different schedule of drugs in these “frail” patients but, how the “frailty” should be assessed in every single patient, is still unsettled. Advanced age, poor performance status (PS) and comorbidities are usually applied to recognize the “frailty” but it is not well known which of them are really prominent and whether these parameters, adjusted for conventional prognostic factors, still affect final outcome. We analyzed a population of symptomatic MM diagnosed from 2007 to 2010 included in the Marche Region MM Registry, to assess the frequency of “frailty” features, such as age, PS, comorbidities, cytopenias, renal insufficiency (RI) and lytic bone lesions, and their role on the overall survival (OS) when adjusted for prognostic factors. Comorbidities were scored according to Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) that split patients in 4 categories according to number and type of comorbidity. Patients were treated with transplant or standard therapy according to their eligibility. Overall, 88% of patients were treated with new drug-based therapies and 12% with MP. Median age of the 266 patients analyzed was 73 years (range 38–90). Twenty-four percent of patients had IgA MM, fifty patients (23%) had ISS stage=3 and 29/166 (17.5%) had unfavourable cytogenetics. Regarding “frailty” measures, 38% of patients had 〉 75 years, 39% had PS=2–4, 34% had 1 or more comorbidities. The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (35%), heart diseases (22%), diabetes (15%), neurological diseases (16%), COBP (8%), secondary malignancies (8%) and chronic renal failure (6%). CCI ≥1 was detected in 51%. Increasing comorbitities number and CCI were associated with increased age although 37% of patients aged less than 65 years had CCI ≥2. Moreover, 35% had at least 2 cytopenias, 76% had bone disease and 14% had RI. Fifty patients (19%) died during follow-up. OS at 3 years was 74%. Univariate analysis performed on the total population determined age 〉 65 years (p=0.065), PS=2–4 (p

Description: Abstract 3020 Background. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, three/four-drug combinations seem to be more effective compared with two-drug associations in terms of both rate and duration of remission. Moreover, there is an emergent body of evidences that consolidation/maintenance therapy improves quality of response and remission duration. However, the impact of these strategies in relapsed/refractory MM (r-rMM) are still unknown. Methods. This is a multicenter, phase II study including patients with r-rMM having measurable disease, no more than 4 prior lines of therapy, adequate performance status, cardiac and liver function. As induction therapy patients received 6 28-day cycles of oral thalidomide 100 mg/day continuously at bedtime, oral dexamethasone 20 mg on day 1–2, 4–5, 8–9, 11–12, pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (pLD) 30 mg/m2 iv on day 4 and bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 iv on day 1, 4, 8, 11 (ThaDD-V). As consolidation patients underwent 6 28-day cycles of rotating bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 iv on day 1, 4, 8, 11 plus oral dexamethasone 20 mg on day 1–2, 4–5, 8–9 (3 courses) or thalidomide 100 mg/day continuously at bedtime plus oral dexamethasone 20 mg on day 1–4 (3 courses). Patients eligible and having suitable stem cell storage underwent ASCT instead of standard consolidation at the discretion of attending physician. Maintenance therapy included thalidomide 100 mg/day until relapse or intolerable toxicity. Since in the first 20 patients we recognized an excess of peripheral neuropathy, protocol was amended as follow: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 on day 1, 4, 11 and thalidomide 50 mg/day in all therapeutic phases. The primary end-points of this study were best response and toxicity of the planned therapy. Results. Forty-six patients were enrolled. Median age was 63.5 years (range 31–80 years) and the median number of prior regimens was 1 (range 1–4). Twenty-four patients (52%) had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation, 30 (65%) had received anthracyclines, 27 (59%) thalidomide, 8 (17.5%) bortezomib and 16 (35%) were refractory to the last regimen. After induction 16 patients (34.5%) achieved CR (6=13% sCR), 15 (32.5%) VGPR and 4 (8.5%) PR with a ORR of 76.5%. Seven patients (15%) progressed. Out of 46 patients undergone induction, 26 (20 standard, 6 ASCT) received consolidation therapy since 1 patients died during induction, 8 had progressive disease, 1 had second neoplasm, 7 had severe toxicities and 3 undergone allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Excluding 6 patients who have obtained sCR before, 5 (25%) out of 20 patients had further improvement in response. Therefore, best response after induction and consolidation were: 25 CR (54%; 8 sCR=17.5%), 16 VGPR (34.5%) and 2 PR (4.5%). Maintenance therapy did not further improve response. Patients receiving ≤ 2 prior regimens had a CR rate significantly higher than those heavily treated (41% vs 0%; p= 0.010) whereas prior ASCT, thalidomide or bortezomib, refractory disease and bortezomib dose-intensity did not affect quality of response. After a median follow-up of 31 months (range 12–53), 28 patients relapsed and 20 died. Median TTP was 18.5 months, median PFS was 17.5 months and median survival was 40 months. Median TTP of patients achieving PR-VGPR was 16 months (3 years= 10%) whereas in those obtaining CR it was 32.5 months (3 years= 45%; p=0.032) vs not reached (3 years= 85%) in patients achieving sCR (p=0.003). Main toxicity was peripheral neuropathy (PN). Indeed, in the first 20 patients we observed 6 (30%) grade 2 and 3 (15%) grade 3 PN. After amendment, grade 2 and 3 PN occurred in 3 (11.5%) and 2 patients (7.5%), respectively. DVT occurred in 2 patients (4.5%) and severe infection in 7 (15%). Grade 3–4 neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 (8.5%), 2 (4%) and 7 patients (15%), respectively. Finally, only one patients died of myocardial infarction during induction. During consolidation therapy other 2 patients developed grade 3 peripheral neuropathy. During maintenance with thalidomide no patients developed severe neuropathy requiring discontinuation. Conclusions. Multi-drug combination namely ThaDD-V as induction followed by consolidation-maintenance therapy seems to be very effective in patients with r-rMM provided that this procedure is used early on relapse when very deep responses are still possible. A reduced dose-intensity of bortezomib significantly decreases PN without jeopardizing outcome. Disclosures: Offidani: Celcene, Janssen Cilag: Honoraria. Polloni:Celgene: Honoraria. Corvatta:Celgene: Honoraria. Gentili:Celgene: Honoraria. Brunori:Celgene, Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Catarini:Cerlgene, Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Malerba:celgene, Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Leoni:Celgene, Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria.

Description: Abstract 3019 Background: Panobinostat (LBH-589) is a pan-deacetilase inhibitor that targets histone proteins increasing tumor suppressor gene activities leading to cell-cycle and differentiation arrest besides to target non-histone proteins such as HSP90, aggressomes, p53, HIF-1a, and a-tubulin somehow promoting cell death. Panobinostat, combined with steroids and/or immunomodulatory drugs, demonstrated additive/synergistic activity in Multiple Myeloma (MM) and ability to overcome previous chemoresistance. Several combination studies with Panobinostat plus novel drugs are now ongoing in MM. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, phase I-II study exploring the combination of a standard therapy such as MPT (Melphalan 0.18 mg/kg per os for 4 days, Prednisone 1.5 mg/kg per os for 4 days, Thalidomide 50 mg/day continuously) with Panobinostat 15 mg p.o. thrice weekly for 3 weeks in a 28-day cycle to assess safety profile and activity of this combination in patients with relapsed/refractory MM having adequate performance status and haematological, cardiac, liver and neurological functions. The study was designed according to the Briant and Day method that plans a “dose-escalation phase” to determine both the MTD and the activity of the study drug and an “expansion-phase” in which the MTD of the study drug is used to further assess its safety and efficacy. Despite in the first phase of this study 19 patients were planned according to the study design, protocol was amended after 13 patients had been enrolled since more than 50% grade 3–4 toxicity occurred although response criteria were met. Therefore, Panobinostat was reduced to 10 mg p.o. thrice weekly for 3 weeks in a 28-day cycle whereas the dose of drugs of the MPT combination was not modified. Toxicity and response were assessed according to CTC version 4 and IMWG criteria, respectively. Results: As of February 2010, 24 patients were enrolled in this study. Median age was 71.5 years (range 40–81 years) and 12 patients (50%) had ISS 2–3 score. Patients had received a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–6) and 5 (21%) three or more prior lines of therapy. Sixteen (73%), 13 (54%), 18 (75%), 11 (46%) and 9 (37.5%) patients had been previously treated with ASCT, thalidomide, bortezomib, lenalidomide and all 3 new-drugs, respectively. Seven patients (29%) were refractory to the last therapy. Twelve patients (50%) had a disease history longer than 5 years. In the first 13 patients treated with Panobinostat 15 mg, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 6 (46%) and 9 patients (69%), respectively. Moreover, 4 patients (31%) developed non-hematological adverse events such as fatigue, constipation, infection and arrythmia. In the group of 11 patients treated with Panobinostat 10 mg, grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia decreased to 18% (2 patients) but neutropenia was still high (8 patients: 72.5%). Three patients (27%) had grade 3–4 non-hematological toxicity (one fatigue and two constipation). No patients had QTcF prolongation or severe neuropathy. Dose adjustment was necessary in 9 patients (37.5%, all due to hematological toxicity) while 6 patients (25%) interrupted the protocol because of side effects (5 due to no resolution of grade 3–4 hematological toxicity within 4 weeks and one due to atrial fibrillation). One patient (4%) died on study due to sepsis during prolonged neutropenia. Response ≥ PR were observed in 12 patients (50%) including 4 VGPR and 8 PR. Additionally, 2 patients had MR and 8 SD. Only 2 patients progressed during treatment. There was no difference between the two cohorts of patients (Panobinostat 15 mg and Panobinostat 10 mg) in terms of response ≥ PR (54% vs 45.5%) or disease progression (7.5% vs 9%). Notably, response was obtained also in 2/7 patients (28%) who progressed during bortezomib or IMIDs. Conclusions: This study suggests that MPT-Panobinostat combination has an encouraging anti-myeloma activity since responses were still seen in patients with advanced stage or resistant to new drugs diseases. Different schedules of Panobinostat/melphalan should be explored to reduce haematological toxicity. Disclosures: Offidani: Celgene: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Panobinostat in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Cavallo:Celgene: Honoraria. Polloni:Celgene: Honoraria. Ballanti:Celgene: Honoraria. Catarini:Celgene: Honoraria. Alesiani:Celgene: Honoraria. Corvatta:Celgene: Honoraria. Gentili:Celgene: Honoraria. Boccadoro:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Leoni:Celgene: Honoraria. Palumbo:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: Bendamustine, a bifunctional alkylating agent, exerts a mechanism of action different from that of other conventional alkylators despite it remains mostly unknown. In patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed-refractory MM bendamustine has proven to be active either as monotherapy or in combination with new drugs, particularly bortezomib and immunomodulatory agents. Methods: The preliminary results of this prospective, phase II study conducted in 22 Italian centres are recently published (Blood Cancer J. 2013, 3: e162). Here we present the conclusive results of the combination Bendamustine (70 mg/m2 days 1, 8), Bortezomib (1.3 mg/ m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) and Dexamethasone (20 mg days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12) (BVD) administered every 4 weeks in patients with relapsed-refractory MM of any age, with adequate cardiac, liver and hematological function, not refractory to bortezomib and treated with no more than four previous lines of therapy. The primary endpoint of this study was achievement of a response at least PR, as to IMWG criteria, after four cycles of BVD. Patients achieving a response less than a PR were taken off-study. Patients obtaining at least a PR received two additional treatment cycles followed by a 12-months consolidation phase with cycles repeated every 2 months. Therefore, patients with a PR after the induction phase could receive up to 18 months of treatment and up to 12 cycles of BVD. Results: 75 patients were included in the study. Median age was 68 years (range 41-85 years), 26.5% had ISS stage 3, 19% IgA myeloma and 9% renal failure. Eight of 36 evaluable patients (22%) had high-risk cytogenetics. Patients had received a median of one prior line of therapy (range 1-4). All patients had received prior treatment with new drugs, such as thalidomide (57%), lenalidomide (54.5%), bortezomib (46.5%) or both (20%). Twenty-four patients (32%) were refractory to IMIDs. Best response rate was 75%, including 14 CRs (20%), 22 VGPRs (24%) and 27 PRs (31%). Five patients (6.5%) died early. Only prior treatment with bortezomib significantly reduced the response rate ≥ PR (48.5% vs 80%; P = 0.004). At a median follow-up of 27 months (range 18-38), 45 patients had progressed and 43 had died. Median TTP and PFS were 17 and 12.5 months, respectively while median OS was 24 months (40% at 3 years). After longer follow-up, prior therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide was confirmed as the only factor that significantly reduced TTP (9 vs 19 months; HR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.3-5.8; P = 0.009), PFS (9 vs 15 months; HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-3.8; P = 0.020) and OS (17 vs 32 months; HR = 2.1; 95% CI = 1.2-3.9; P = 0.043). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 55% of patients leading to therapy reduction in 24% and to protocol discontinuation in 11% of patients. The most frequent severe adverse events were thrombocytopenia (28%), neutropenia (20%), infections (12%), peripheral neuropathy (9%), gastrointestinal (5%) and cardiovascular events (4%). Compared with younger, patients aged 〉 70 years had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 side effects particularly thrombocytopenia and infections with, consequently, a higher rate of therapy reduction and discontinuation. Moreover, 4/5 early deaths occurred in patients aged more than 70 years. Conclusions: BVD combination is an effective and well tolerated regimen in relapsed-refractory MM. Data suggest that the optimal target of BVD maybe patients younger than 70 years who has not previously received both bortezomib and lenalidomide. Disclosures Offidani: Mundipharma, Janssen: Honoraria. Off Label Use: Bendamustine. Corvatta:Janssen: Honoraria. Ballanti:Janssen: Honoraria. Brunori:Janssen: Honoraria.

Description: Abstract 5003 Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease typically characterized by repeated relapse that needs several new-drugs throughout its clinical course. Therefore, increasing knowledge of the pathways involved in the pathophysiology of MM will contribute to identified new therapeutic strategies. Specific signaling pathways as: nuclear factor kappa B (NFkB), farnelsyl-transferase (FTI), mitogenen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), proteosoma and others have been found to be disregulated in MM patients and cell lines. These findings have allowed the design of specific inhibitors that have been assessed in preclinical and clinical studies. Recent data have highlighted the contribute of ion channels (K+, Cl−, Na+ and Ca2+) in the regulation of cell proliferation, chemo-resistance, migration and invasion. Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid type-2 (TRPV2) is a cation channel, member of the TRPV family, and its expression in human cancer cells and tissues has been reported for gliomas, prostate, bladder and pancreas, while no data were available in MM or in other hematological malignancies. TRPV2 expression has been found to influence cancer cell responses to chemo-therapeutic drugs as well as proliferation, migration and apoptosis, in part by increasing intracellular Ca2+ influx and/or by regulating specific signal pathways, like MAPK associated pathways. TRPV2 responds to noxious heat with an activation threshold of 〉52°C as well as to changes in osmolarity and membrane stretch; in addition, TRPV2 is activated by agonists such as 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate, as well as cannabinoids. The aim of this study was, firstly, to evaluate if TRPV2 was expressed in three human MM cell lines established models (RPMI, SKO-007, U266). Secondly we investigated on the role of TRPV2 activation in regulating the proteosoma inhibitor Bortezomib activity, in MM cell lines. By Real-Time PCR analysis we demonstrated that TRPV2 gene was expressed, with comparable relative levels, in the MM cell lines studied, and similar results were obtained at protein levels by Western blot analysis. Moreover, by immunofluorescence and FACS analysis we found that the percentage of TRPV2+ cells was 11% in RPMI, 3% in U266 and 2.6% in SKO-007. These data indicate that TRPV2 was expressed at low levels in MM cell lines. Since lost of TRPV2 expression was found to be associated with higher cell proliferation rate, in other tumor cell lines, and increasing of TRPV2 transcription and/or activity by specific agonists induced cell death and anti-proliferative effects, we evaluated the biological effects of TRPV2 activation in MM cell lines by MTT assay. The results showed that, after three incubation days, TRPV2 activation induced a decrease of cell viability of 70% in RPMI, 60% in U266 and 55% in SKO-007, compared to control. To evaluate if the reduced cell viability was dependent by an anti-proliferative and/or apoptotic process, the three cell lines treated with the TRPV2 agonist were analyzed by 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assay for proliferation and by Annexin-V apoptosis assays. Data shown a decrease of BrdU+ cells in TRPV2 agonist treated cells (40% in RPMI, 30% in U266 and 28% in SKO-007) compared to control, while no significant differences were observed by Annexin-V analysis. Moreover, to evaluate a putative role of TRPV2 in influencing Bortezomib cytotoxicity, RPMI, SKO-007 and U266, were co-treated with the TRPV2 agonist in combination or not with Bortezomib, for three days. By a dose-response MTT analysis we determined that TRPV2 activation reduced MM cell lines viability more than 40% in RPMI, 20 % in U266 and 15% in SKO-007, compared to Bortezomib (5 ng/ml) alone. Summarizing, these preliminary data demonstrated that the TRPV2 cation channel was expressed in human MM cell lines and that activation of TRPV2 could play a role in increasing Bortezomib cytotoxicity, by inhibiting cell proliferation rather than increasing apoptosis of MM cells. These data may open new perspectives in combination therapy, albeit the molecular mechanisms undergone TRPV2 activation needs to be clarified. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Bendamustine, a bi-functional alkylating agent comprising a purine-like benzimidazole ring an a nitrogen mustard group, exerts a peculiar mechanism of action if compared to most conventional alkylators and this may partially explain its effectiveness in alkylator-resistant cells. In patients with MM several studies demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of bendamustine as monotherapy or in combination with new drugs, particularly bortezomib that was found to enhance the in vitro sensitivity of MM cells to bendamustine. These observations represented the rationale for our protocol design namely to evaluate the combination bendamustine (70 mg/m2 days 1, 8), bortezomib (1.3 mg/ m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11) and dexamethasone (20 mg days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9, 11-12) (BVD). Cycles were administered every 4 weeks up to four cycles. Patients achieving a response less than a PR were taken off-study. Patients obtaining at least a PR received two additional treatment cycles followed by a 12-months consolidation phase with cycles repeated every 2 months. Therefore, patients with a PR after the induction phase could receive up to 18 months of treatment and up to 12 cycles of BVD. Patients with relapsed/refractory MM of any age, with adequate cardiac, liver and hematological function, not refractory to bortezomib and treated with no more than four previous lines of therapy were enrolled in this prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase II study conducted in 21 Italian centres. The primary endpoint was achievement of a response at least PR after four cycles of BVD and response was assessed according to to IMWG criteria. From March 2011 to June 2012, 75 patients were included. Median age was 68 years (range 41-85), 26.5% had ISS stage 3, 19% IgA myeloma and 9% renal failure. In total, 8 of 36 evaluable patients (22%) had adverse cytogenetics. All patients had received prior treatment with new drugs, including targeted agents such as thalidomide (57%), lenalidomide (54.5%) or bortezomib (46.5%). Patients had received a median of one prior line of therapy (range 1-4), including alkylators (69%), anthracyclines (29%) and ASCT (44%). Twenty-four patients (32%) were refractory to IMIDs. The response rate ≥ PR after four cycles of BVD was 71.5%, including 11 patients with CR (16%), 13 VGPRs (18.5%) and 26 PRs (37%). Also, 14 patients (20%) had disease stabilization while 6 (8.5%) had progressive disease. Median time to response was 1.2 months (range 0.9-1.4 months). Only prior treatment with bortezomib significantly reduced the response rate ≥ PR (54.5% vs 86.5%; P = 0.003). At a median follow-up of 12 months (range 6-24), 30 patients had progressed and 18 had died. Median TTP and PFS were 16.5 months and 15.5 months, respectively while median OS had not been reached and 78% of patients were alive at 1 year. The Cox regression analysis identified prior therapy with bortezomib plus lenalidomide as the only factor that significantly reduced TTP (9 vs 17 months; HR = 4.5; 95% CI = 1.7-12.3; P = 0.005) Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 55% of patients leading to therapy reduction in 20% and to protocol discontinuation in 10.5% of patients. The most frequent severe adverse events were thrombocytopenia (30.5%), neutropenia (18.5%), infections (12%), peripheral neuropathy (8%), gastrointestinal and cardiovascular events (both 6.5%). Compared with younger, patients aged 〉 70 years had a significantly higher incidence of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (22% vs 37%; p=0.042) and severe infections (7 vs 19%; p=0.047) and consequently a higher rate of therapy reduction (9% vs 34.5%; p=0.007) and therapy discontinuation (7% vs 15.5%; p=0.043). Moreover, 4/5 early deaths occurred in patients aged more than 70 years. BVD combination is an effective regimen in relapsed-refractory MM patients since it elicits rapid, high (〉 70%) and good quality of response (more than a third of patients achieved CR + VGPR). Moreover, BVD combination is a feasible and well tolerated regimen provided that adapted therapy and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis are employed in patients older than 70 years. Disclosures: Offidani: Mundipharma: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bendamustine.