Publication Date:
2022-05-26
Description:
Author Posting. © The Author(s), 2017. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here under a nonexclusive, irrevocable, paid-up, worldwide license granted to WHOI. It is made available for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Advances in Water Resources 111 (2018): 205-223, doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.11.016.
Description:
A three-dimensional Eulerian two-phase flow model for sediment transport in sheet flow conditions is presented. To resolve turbulence and turbulence-sediment interactions, the large-eddy simulation approach is adopted. Specifically, a dynamic Smagorinsky closure is used for the subgrid fluid and sediment stresses, while the subgrid contribution to the drag force is included using a drift velocity model with a similar dynamic procedure. The contribution of sediment stresses due to intergranular interactions is modeled by the kinetic theory of granular flow at low to intermediate sediment concentration, while at high sediment concentration of enduring contact, a phenomenological closure for particle pressure and frictional viscosity is used. The model is validated with a comprehensive high-resolution dataset of unidirectional steady sheet flow (Revil-Baudard et al., 2015, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 767, 1–30). At a particle Stokes number of about 10, simulation results indicate a reduced von Kármán coefficient of κ ≈ 0.215 obtained from the fluid velocity profile. A fluid turbulence kinetic energy budget analysis further indicates that the drag-induced turbulence dissipation rate is significant in the sheet flow layer, while in the dilute transport layer, the pressure work plays a similar role as the buoyancy dissipation, which is typically used in the single-phase stratified flow formulation. The present model also reproduces the sheet layer thickness and mobile bed roughness similar to measured data. However, the resulting mobile bed roughness is more than two times larger than that predicted by the empirical formulae. Further analysis suggests that through intermittent turbulent motions near the bed, the resolved sediment Reynolds stress plays a major role in the enhancement of mobile bed roughness. Our analysis on near-bed intermittency also suggests that the turbulent ejection motions are highly correlated with the upward sediment suspension flux, while the turbulent sweep events are mostly associated with the downward sediment deposition flux.
Description:
This study was supported by National Science Foundation (OCE-1635151; OCE-
958 1537231) and Office of Naval Research (N00014-16-1-2853). J. Chauchat was supported by the Region Rhones-Alpes (COOPERA project and Explora Pro grant) and
the French national programme EC2CO-LEFE MODSED. The authors would also like to acknowledge the support from the program on "Fluid-Mediated Particle Transport in
Geophysical Flows" at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, Santa Barbara, USA.
Keywords:
Large eddy simulation
;
Sediment transport
;
Sheet flow
;
Two-phase flow
;
Near-bed intermittency
Repository Name:
Woods Hole Open Access Server
Type:
Preprint
Permalink
