ALBERT

Description: Eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) during the first months of treatment for patients (pts) with ALL is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS). We hypothesized that Alemtuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD52, might be an effective, novel agent for eradication of MRD in ALL based on data demonstrating strong CD52 expression in other lymphoid malignancies and in several ALL cell lines, and from case reports of clinical activity in advanced ALL. In CALGB 10102, to define the percentage of CD52+ cases and to demonstrate feasibility, we tested dose escalation of Alemtuzumab in sequential cohorts to a target dose of 30 mg administered sc 3X/week for 4 weeks (12 doses) during post-remission therapy. Pts are eligible to receive Alemtuzumab if lymphoblast CD52 expression at diagnosis is ≥ 10% as determined in a CALGB reference laboratory. The 10102 therapy is composed of monthly treatment modules outlined below: Treatment module sequence is: A,B,C, D, A, B, C followed by maintenance therapy for a total of 2 years. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) (e.g. acyclovir 800 mg qid) and pneumocystis carinii is mandated. Weekly quantitative monitoring for CMV viremia is performed. 150 pts with untreated ALL have enrolled: Median age is 48 yrs. 124 (83%) pts have precursor-B; 19(13%) have precursor T-ALL and 7 (4%) have biphenotypic or bilineal ALL. Of 139 evaluable pts, 95 (68%) had CD52 ≥ 10%. By immunophenotype, 72% of precursor B and 61% of precursor T pts were eligible to receive Alemtuzumab. Phase I dose escalation was recently completed. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) for Phase I was defined as the inability to proceed with protocol treatment within 6 weeks of the last dose of Alemtuzumab. Non-heme toxicities have been mild and sc Alemtuzumab administration was well tolerated. Hematologic and infectious toxicities are summarized below: Myelosuppression was transient and use of G-CSF was permitted during Module D. 2 pts were treated for CMV viremia due to rising CMV titers in 2 sequential assays. 6 other pts had transient CMV elevations during or immediately following completion of Alemtuzumab that did not require treatment. 22/24 phase I pts received all 12 doses of Alemtuzumab. There were 2 DLTs reported: 1 pt in cohort 2 due to CMV viremia requiring gancyclovir following completion of Alemtuzumab; and 1 pt in cohort 3 due to ANC 〈 1500 six weeks after Alemtuzumab (pt was not given G-CSF). Based on these Phase I data, the targeted dose of 30 mg Alemtuzumab was recommended for further study in the ongoing Phase II study. In summary, we report for the first time that CD52 is expressed in the majority of ALL cases and demonstrate the feasibility of employing Alemtuzumab in front-line therapy. Ongoing accrual to the phase II study will evaluate the efficacy of Alemtuzumab in eradication of MRD in adult ALL. Module A Module B Module C Module D (Alemtuzumab) Maintenance Cytoxan Cytoxan Methotrexate (IV, PO, IT) 10 mg* cohort 1 Vincristine Daunorubicin Cytarabine Vincristine 20 mg* cohort 2 Dexamethasone Vincristine Vincrisitne 6-MP 30 mg* cohort 3 6-MP Dexamethasone L-asparaginase *Phase I dose escalation Methotrexate L-asparaginase IT-Methotrexate Alemtuzumab cohorts N Myelosuppression (grades 3 or 4) Lymphopenia CMV viremia 10 mg 6 2 1 2 20 mg 10 1 1 4 30 mg 8 1 0 2

Description: Abstract 44 CALGB (now part of the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology) performed a non-randomized phase II study testing one year (yr) of investigational maintenance therapy with decitabine for newly diagnosed adult AML patients (pts) 1 × 109/L, platelets 〉75 × 109/L, and be within 90 days after day 1 of the final consolidation. Decitabine 20mg/m2 was given IV over 1 hour for 4–5 days, every 6 weeks, for 8 cycles. 546 pts enrolled with a median age of 48 yrs (range, 17–60) and median presenting white blood count (WBC) of 12.6 × 109/L (range, 0.3–380 × 109/L). 75% achieved CR (412/546). Reasons for CR pts not receiving maintenance were mainly early relapse, alloHCT in 1st CR, inadequate count recovery, and patient refusal (Blum et al. ASH 2011). 33% of CR pts (134/412) received investigational maintenance. Of these, 46 (34%) were favorable risk; among the remaining 88 pts, 73 were consolidated with autoHCT, and 15 received HiDAC-based consolidation. The median time from initial study registration to initiation of maintenance therapy was 6.3 months. Pts receiving decitabine had a median age of 45 yrs (range, 18–60) and presenting WBC of 13.5 × 109/L (range, 0.4–221 × 109/L). Treatment with decitabine maintenance was feasible and reasonably well tolerated; the primary toxicity was myelosuppression. Preplanned dose reduction criteria for neutropenia were met after the first 20 pts had been treated. After this early timepoint, all subsequent pts who had been consolidated with autoHCT received only 4 days of decitabine per cycle (HiDAC consolidated pts continued to receive 5 days per cycle). The median number of cycles of decitabine received was 7 (range, 1–8); 46% of pts (62/134) received all 8 cycles, and 75% completed at least 4 cycles. Reasons for discontinuation of decitabine before completing 8 cycles included relapse (28%, 38/134), pt refusal (13%), adverse events (4%), and others. In this selected cohort of pts who received post-CR maintenance with decitabine, 1-yr and 3-yr overall survival (OS) were 96% and 66%; 1-yr and 3-yr disease-free survival (DFS) were 80% and 53%. 1-yr “failure-free survival” calculated from the time of registration to decitabine was 68% (70% for favorable risk, 68% for others). These results are similar to the outcomes for comparable pts enrolled on our prior CALGB study 19808 who received identical chemotherapy for induction and consolidation and then were randomized to observation or maintenance with interleukin-2 (3-yr OS 61% and 68%, 3-yr DFS 45% and 56%, for observation and IL-2 respectively). Post-consolidation maintenance with decitabine appears to provide only modest, if any, benefit overall. Correlative studies for CALGB 10503 are ongoing, including investigations into the impact of decitabine in unique molecular and cytogenetic subsets of disease, the prognostic/predictive value of aberrant methylation and other molecular markers, and assessment of minimal residual disease. Supported by CA33601 and CA128377. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Rationale: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the most effective therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The graft-versus-leukemia effect (GVL), mediated by the engrafted T lymphocytes targeting leukemic cells, is thought to play an important role in affecting the overall outcome of patients with AML. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has emerged as an alternative and effective source of hematopoietic stem cells in high risk patients. We previously reported the hematopoietic reconstitution and clinical outcomes in 45 patients undergoing haplo-cord transplant, a novel approach which combines haploidentical and cord blood grafts to avoid delayed hematopoietic recovery after cord blood transplant (Liu H,et al. Blood. 2011;118(24):6438-45). However, very little is known about immune reconstitution of cord blood cells and whether the emerging immune repertoire correlates with clinical outcome. The great majority of T cell receptors in T lymphocytes are heterodimers of alpha (TCRA) and beta (TCRB) subunits. Somatic recombination combining the VJ (alpha) and VDJ (beta) segments results in an astronomical functional diversity and complexity of TCR receptors, and makes the characterization of their functions a tremendously complex process. To obtain insights into the T-cell repertoire, we have utilized next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology to comprehensively characterize T-cell kinetics and diversity following haplo-cord transplantation. Methods: We evaluated the emerging T-cell repertoire in 10 patients (pts) with high-risk AML enrolled on a clinical trial of haplo-cord transplantation at the University of Chicago. The median age of the pts was 57 years old (range: 26-67) and 3 pts had active disease at the time of transplant. The median UCB dose was 1.6x107 TNC/kg with HLA cord matching of 4/6 in 3 pts and 5/6 or 6/6 in 7 pts. The median overall and disease free survival were 2.4 and 2.2 years, respectively. cDNA was generated from mRNA isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells prior to and at sequential time points 30, 100, 180 and 365 days post haplo-cord transplant were sequenced the samples with Ion Personal Genome Machine (PGM) Sequencer and a 400-bp reading kit. We analyzed the sequences by applying a recently developed algorithm in order to determine the VJ and VDJ combinations and CDR3 sequences. Chimerism was determined by microsatellite sequences of DNA of donor and recipient cells. Diversity was calculated for each of TCRA and TCRB using the inverse Simpson’s index. Results: Several clones found in pre-treatment samples obtained from recipients before transplant persisted at low frequency on days 100 and 365 post-transplant suggesting that these clones have evaded the immuno-suppressive conditioning regimens. In order to correlate the diversity of TCRs with the percentage of cord cells in patients’ blood at different time points, we dichotomized patients into cord present (〉5%) and cord absent (≤5%) groups, based on the cord blood percentage in blood on day 30 post haplo-cord transplant and correlated it with diversity on day 100. We found that TCRs of pts with 〉5% cord cells on day 30 post haplo-cord transplant were significantly more diverse (TCRA; P=0.008) and (TCRB; P=0.01) (Fig.1) on day 100 compared to TCRs in patients with 90% cord cells on day 100 post-transplant. Therefore, we examined the correlation between diversity calculated on day 100 and percentage of persisting haplo-identical cells on the same day. We found,, the diversity of TCRB of pts with persistence of 〉10% haplo-identical cells were 15.05 compared with 72.95 for those with 10% and

Description: Background: Disease relapse remains the primary cause of mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). One important mechanism of disease relapse in this setting is failure of the graft-versus-tumor (GvT) effect, and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis may diminish GvT after alloSCT. We hypothesized that PD-1/PD-L1 interactions prevent donor-derived T cells from eliminating malignant cells expressing minor histocompatibility antigens, and that blocking PD-1/PD-L1 interactions with the anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab (pem), might restore GvT and induce clinical responses in patients (pts) with relapsed hematologic malignancies following alloHCT. However, PD-1 blockade therapy has been associated with severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in murine models, and GVHD has been reported in humans treated with anti-PD-1 therapy after alloHCT. Thus, we developed a prospective clinical study to test the tolerability and preliminary efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with relapsed leukemia/lymphoma after alloSCT. Methods: Pts with AML, MDS, or B cell lymphomas with biopsy-proven recurrence after alloSCT were eligible, as long as no active acute GVHD 〉 grade 1 or chronic GVHD was present. Pts were treated with pem 200 mg IV q3 weeks for up to 2 years, provided that neither intolerable side-effects nor disease progression occurred. Pem could be delayed for treatment-limiting toxicities (TLT), defined as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) not meeting criteria for a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLT was defined as the development of grade 3 or 4 acute GVHD/irAE, any unexpected grade 〉 2 toxicity related to pem, or development of 〉 grade 2 vital organ dysfunction secondary to an irAE within 90 days of pem initiation. A two-stage mini-max design was chosen, with an early stopping rule for DLT after the first 11 patients were enrolled. Results: 11 pts (7 male, 4 female), mean age 49.5 yrs (range, 27-62 yrs) have been enrolled. 8 pts had AML and 3 had lymphoma (DLBCL - 2, cHL - 1). 6 pts had matched-related donors (MRD) and 5 pts had haploidentical/umbilical cord blood (haplo-cord) donors. Pts with MRD were conditioned with fludarabine, melphalan, and alemtuzumab, or fludarabine and busulfan. Pts with haplo-cord donors were conditioned with fludarabine, melphalan, and ATG. 5 pts had prior acute GVHD. Pts relapsed following alloHCT at a median of 453 days (range, 101-1021 days). A median of 2 cycles of pembrolizumab (range, 1-8) was administered. 3 pts are receiving ongoing treatment. 3 pts experienced a DLT due to an irAE (grade 3-4 pneumonitis 2 pts; grade 3 hyperthyroidism 1 pt), all of which occurred after 1-2 cycles of pem, and resolved after pem discontinuation and corticosteroid treatment. 1 pt experienced a TLT (grade 2 rash), but resumed pem treatment. Among all pts, irAEs of any grade occurred in 7 pts. 7 pts were evaluable for response. 3 pts (2 AML, 1 DLBCL) experienced progressive disease (PD), 2 pts (AML) had stable disease (SD), and 2 pts achieved CR (DLBCL, cHL). 1 pt with AML (myeloid sarcoma) in whom pem was discontinued for PD by PET/CT imaging had a concurrent tumor biopsy that revealed marked T cell infiltration and PD-L1 expression on a significant fraction of malignant myeloid cells, suggestive of possible inflammatory "pseudo-progression". 1 pt in CR developed therapy-related AML unrelated to pem. Notably, both patients with CR following pem had PD-L1 gene-amplified lymphomas by FISH, and diffuse PD-L1 protein expression on pre-treatment biopsies. Currently, 4 pts have died, all due to disease progression, and 7 are alive. A total of 26 patients are expected to be enrolled. Conclusions: Treatment with pem in the post-alloHCT disease relapse setting is feasible, but can induce early and severe irAEs, requiring vigilant monitoring. To date, objective responses were seen in 2/3 lymphoma patients treated with pem. In AML, pem may be less effective, where a best response of SD was observed in 2 pts, and possible "pseudo-progression" in a patient with myeloid sarcoma. This study continues to accrue pts, and correlative analyses are underway. To our knowledge, these are the first prospective data of PD-1 blockade therapy in the post-alloHCT setting. Disclosures Kline: iTeos: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding. Liu:BMS: Research Funding. Curran:Merck: Research Funding. Stock:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Smith:BMS: Consultancy; Portola: Honoraria. Bishop:Juneau Therapeutics: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; United Healthcare: Employment; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Speakers Bureau.

Description: Introduction: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) advances in reduced intensity conditioning, donor identification, and supportive care have led to its increased use over the last few decades. HCT is a complex process that requires coordination at multiple levels, and there may be disparities in its utilization. To better understand these access disparities, we conducted a systematic review of studies that assessed barriers to referral and/or receipt of HCT. Additionally, we focused on a subgroup of older patients (aged ≥65 at transplant), who we hypothesized would be at higher risk for access barriers to HCT. Methods: A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched for articles published in English from PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials between the database inception and January 12th, 2018. Inclusion criteria were: 1) clinical trials, observational, qualitative, cross-sectional, or mixed-method study designs; 2) study assessed barriers to HCT or factors associated with referral for or receipt of HCT (except for country-specific economic factors as these are less likely to be targetable), 3) included patients ≥18 years with cancer. Narrative review articles and abstracts without full text were excluded. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts (N=3,262) and assessed studies for full-text eligibility (N=153). A third reviewer resolved any discrepancies. Eighteen studies met eligibility criteria and an additional 5 studies (not identified on our search strategy) were included on review of the bibliographies. Literature on subgroup of patients aged ≥65 was also assessed. Results: Among the 23 studies included, 16 were published after 2010. Studies were retrospective (N=18; 14 from registry data), cross-sectional (N=4; 2 from registry data), and mixed-method (N=1), and primarily conducted in the US (N=21). Barriers were assessed at the patient level (N=19; sample size ranged from 350 to 38,420), healthcare professional level (N=3; 1 study assessed both patients and healthcare professionals), or country level (N=2). Fourteen studies included some information on age of the patients and 10 studies included some patients aged 60 and above. Seventeen studies only included patients with hematologic malignancies. Age was the most common barrier identified (N=16 out of 16 studies identified older age as a barrier). Fourteen studies showed that older age was associated with lower odds of referral for or receipt of HCT, and the remaining 2 studies provided descriptive data showing lower percentages of patients receiving HCT compared to the younger age groups. Table 1 shows other potential barriers or factors associated with lower referral for or receipt of HCT at the patient, disease, physician, and organizational levels. These included race (N=14 out of 16 studies identified non-white race as a barrier), insurance or financial capacity (N=11/12), comorbidity (N=8/9), gender (N=7/17; primarily female), disease status (N=5/5), patient preferences (N=5/5), time of diagnosis (N=5/5), cancer type (N=4/6), and socioeconomic status (N=4/5). Only one study evaluated factors associated with receipt of HCT in a subgroup of patients ≥65 years. Older age, female gender, and a diagnosis of leukemia other than acute myeloid leukemia were associated with lower odds of receiving HCT. Conclusions: There are limited prospective studies evaluating access barriers to HCT in adult patients with cancer. Older age is the most commonly reported barrier to both autologous and allogeneic HCT, although studies have not addressed specific mechanisms for this disparity. In addition, other potential barriers identified such as gender, race, insurance status, and comorbidity have not been well studied in the context of older age. While some barriers may be difficult to intervene upon (e.g. comorbidity, disease status, performance status), many are amenable to interventions (e.g. socioeconomic status, distance to transplant center, social support). With the increasing trend for HCT in older patients, there is a critical need for prospective studies that better describe these access barriers and their mechanisms in order to design future interventions to reduce disparities in HCT access. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Liesveld: Onconova: Other: DSMB; Abbvie: Honoraria. Aljitawi:Medpace: Consultancy; The University of Rochester Medical Center: Patents & Royalties: Pending patent related to decellularized Wharton's jelly matrix. Klepin:Genentech Inc: Consultancy. Stock:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Wildes:Janssen: Research Funding. Majhail:Incyte: Honoraria; Anthem, Inc.: Consultancy; Atara: Honoraria.

Description: Background: Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), a humanized anti-CD22 antibody-calicheamicin conjugate, produced a superior response compared with standard of care (SOC) for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of the first 218 of 326 patients (pts) randomized (ITT218) in the INO-VATE trial (complete remission [CR], including CR with incomplete hematologic recovery [CRi], 80.7% [95% CI, 72-88] vs 29.4% [21-39]; 1-sided P

Description: Mutations in the all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA)–targeted ligand binding domain of PML-RARα (PRα/LBD+) have been implicated in the passive selection of ATRA-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia clones leading to disease relapse. Among 45 relapse patients from the ATRA/chemotherapy arm of intergroup protocol C9710, 18 patients harbored PRα/LBD+ (40%), 7 of whom (39%) relapsed Off-ATRA selection pressure, suggesting a possible active role of PRα/LBD+. Of 41 relapse patients coanalyzed, 15 (37%) had FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplication mutations (FLT3-ITD+), which were differentially associated with PRα/LBD+ depending on ATRA treatment status at relapse: positively, On-ATRA; negatively, Off-ATRA. Thirteen of 21 patients (62%) had additional chromosome abnormalities (ACAs); all coanalyzed PRα/LBD mutant patients who relapsed off-ATRA (n = 5) had associated ACA. After relapse Off-ATRA, ACA and FLT3-ITD+ were negatively associated and were oppositely associated with presenting white blood count and PML-RARα type: ACA, low, L-isoform; FLT3-ITD+, high, S-isoform. These exploratory results suggest that differing PRα/LBD+ activities may interact with FLT3-ITD+ or ACA, that FLT3-ITD+ and ACA are associated with different intrinsic disease progression pathways manifest at relapse Off-ATRA, and that these different pathways may be short-circuited by ATRA-selectable defects at relapse On-ATRA. ACA and certain PRα/LBD+ were also associated with reduced postrelapse survival.

Description: Background: Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) that progress to an accelerated phase (AP) or blast phase (BP) have poor outcomes with a median survival of 3 to 5 months. Approximately 20% of MPN-BP patients have a pathogenic mutation in IDH1 or IDH2. Ivosidenib and enasidenib, inhibitors of the IDH1 and IDH2 mutant enzymes respectively, provide a new treatment approach for high-risk IDH-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). There are limited clinical trial data and real-world experience with IDH inhibitors in MPN-AP/BP. We hypothesized that patients with IDH-mutated MPN-AP/BP may benefit from IDH inhibitor therapy. We performed a single institution retrospective analysis of patients with AML arising from a prior chronic myeloid neoplasm treated with an IDH inhibitor and evaluated outcomes of the MPN-AP/BP patients. Methods: Retrospective chart review was done to identify patients with IDH1/2-mutated MPN AP/BP, AML arising from myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS-AML), or AML arising from CMML (CMML-AML), that were treated with ivosidenib or enasidenib from 1/1/2009-5/14/2019. Response was assessed using both the 2003 International Working Group AML (2003 IWG AML) criteria and 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. For the MPN-AP/BP patients, response was also assessed using the 2012 Post-MPN AML Consortium (2012 MPN-BP) criteria (Mascarenhas et al. Leuk Res 2012). Overall survival from initiation of IDH inhibitor therapy and adverse event data were collected. Results: There were 96 patients with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations identified by analysis of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data. 15 of these patients underwent treatment with an IDH inhibitor and had an antecedent chronic myeloid neoplasm: 7 MPN-BP, 1 MPN-AP, 5 MDS-AML, and 2 CMML-AML. Median age was 69 years old with a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 6. ELN risk criteria could be assessed in 13/15 patients; of those, 54% were adverse-risk. 13 IDH2 mutated patients received enasidenib as monotherapy (n=12) or combined with azacitidine (n=1). 2 IDH1-mutated patients received ivosidenib as monotherapy (n=1) or combined with azacitidine (n=1). Of the 8 MPN-AP/BP patients, 6 received IDH inhibitor therapy in the front-line setting. Of the 7 patients with MDS-AML or CMML-AML, only 2 patients received IDH inhibitor therapy in the frontline setting. The overall response rate (ORR) to IDH inhibitor therapy for the 15 patients was 40% using both the 2003 IWG AML criteria and the 2017 ELN criteria. In the 8 patients with MPN-AP/BP, the ORR was 37.5% using both the 2003 IWG AML response criteria and the 2017 ELN criteria and was 75% when using the 2012 MPN-BP response criteria (Table 1). Median overall survival was not reached for the 3 MPN-BP patients reclassified as responders using 2012 MPN-BP criteria with median follow-up at time of data lock being 431 days (range, 67-1218+). Median duration of IDH inhibitor therapy in the whole 15 patient cohort was 126 days (range, 14-1218+) and 258 days (14-1218+) for MPN-BP patients. Median follow-up at time of data lock was 151 days for all patients and 272 days for MPN-BP patients. Within the MPN-AP/BP cohort, 3 are still on therapy at this time, 2 had stopped due to progression of disease, and 3 had stopped due to an adverse event or clinical deterioration (Figure 1). Median overall survival for all patients after initiation of IDH inhibitor therapy was 235 days (Figure 2). Median survival for patients with MPN-AP/BP (n=8) was not reached compared to 193 days for the 7 patients with MDS-AML or CMML-AML. The incidence of Grade 3 or greater adverse events was similar to the known AE profile of these agents. NGS analysis at time of progression to AML/accelerated phase identified JAK2 and SRSF2 mutations as the most frequent co-mutations (Table 2). Conclusions: Treatment with IDH inhibitor therapy in IDH-mutated MPN-AP/BP patients holds promise as a means of inducing durable responses that extend beyond historical survival data for MPN-BP. In addition, utilization of the 2012 MPN-BP criteria to assess response in this patient population can provide better insight into the benefit of this treatment strategy. Our single institutional experience merits confirmation in a larger group of patients with IDH1/2-mutated MPN-AP/BP. Disclosures Liu: Agios: Honoraria; Novartis: Other: PI of clinical trial; Arog: Other: PI of clinical trial; Karyopharm: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding. Thirman:Celgene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Up to Date: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding. Artz:Miltenyi: Research Funding. Larson:Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Contracts for clinical trials. Stock:Kite, a Gilead Company: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UpToDate: Honoraria; Research to Practice: Honoraria. Segal:Astra Zeneca: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Odenike:Agios: Research Funding; CTI/Baxalta: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Oncotherapy: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Janssen Oncology: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: We discuss the use of the IDH inhibitors ivosidenib and enasidenib in treatment of advanced-phase Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. Ivosidenib is currently approved for use in the frontline setting in IDH1-mutated AML patients 〉75 years old or with comorbidities precluding the use of intensive induction therapy. Ivosidenib is also approved in the relapsed/refractory setting for IDH1-mutated AML. Enasidenib is approved in the relapsed/refractory setting for IDH2-mutated AML.

Description: Two tools have recently been developed to predict allogeneic HCT tolerance: the HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) (Sorror, Blood 2005) and “risk group” (Artz BBMT, 2006). The HCT-CI focuses on a comprehensive list of comorbidities whereas the “risk group” combines a simple comorbidity tool and performance status to identify patients at high risk for transplant-related mortality (TRM) and inferior survival. However, clinical parameters have limitations of reproducibility and accuracy. Biomarkers represent another promising method of risk stratification. Thus, we analyzed whether biomarkers independently predicted HCT tolerance. Among 112 consecutive transplants on a single protocol, 81 patients with pre-HCT cryopreserved sera underwent analysis of C-reactive protein (CRP) and 79 of interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels. AML and MDS represented the most common diagnosis (57%). All patients underwent HCT using fludarabine (125 mg/m2 IV total), melphalan (140 mg/m2 IV total) and alemtuzumab (100 mg IV total). The median age was 52 yrs and 46% had active disease at HCT. The median follow-up was 42 months. To determine tolerance, we evaluated initial hospital duration, aGVHD, and TRM. Median duration of initial hospitalization for HCT was 23 days and Grade II–IV aGVHD developed in 30 pts. Day 100 and day 180 TRM were 17% and 23% respectively. The median pre-HCT CRP level was 18.5 mg/L (mean, 40.5 mg/L; range, 0.17 to 180). The median IL-6 was 78.3 mg/L (range, 10 to 2258). CRP and IL-6 above the median were tested as adverse risk factors. High CRP was strongly associated with prolonged hospitalization (P=0.007) whereas increased IL-6 was not (P=0.30). HCT-comorbidity index (HCT-CI) ≥ 3(P=0.126) and “risk-group” (P=0.091) did not confer an increased risk of prolonged hospitalization. In univariate analysis, CRP above the median also predicted for grade II–IV aGVHD (P= 0.003). TRM was predicted by CRP (P=0.013) but not IL-6 (P=0.22). Multivariate analysis showed CRP retained independent predictive value for TRM when considering adverse risk factors of age ≥50, HCT-CI ≥ 3, active disease, or “risk group”. The impact of these biomarkers was limited to HCT tolerance as CRP and IL-6 did not predict for increased relapse (P=0.42 for both). Finally, inferior overall survival was associated with pre-HCT CRP (P= 0.029) but not IL-6 (P= 0.48). CRP holds promise as a reproducible biomarker to predict HCT related morbidity and mortality independent of standard measures. IL-6 may be less useful. These findings require validation, but because of the ready availability and reproducibility of CRP, this biomarker could be rapidly integrated into other HCT risk-assessment tools. P value for Transplant-Related Mortality Predictive Factor Univariate Multivariate HCT- CI-hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index Age 0.27 0.79 Disease 0.16 0.26 HCT-CI 0.79 0.98 Risk Group 0.11 0.061 C-reactive protein 0.013 0.047 Interleukin-6 0.22 -