ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • PANGAEA  (60)
  • Oxford University Press  (2)
  • American Physical Society
  • 2020-2024  (62)
Collection
Keywords
Year
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: Probing seismic anisotropy of the lithosphere provides valuable clues on the fabric of rocks. We present a 3-D probabilistic model of shear wave velocity and radial anisotropy of the crust and uppermost mantle of Europe, focusing on the mountain belts of the Alps and Apennines. The model is built from Love and Rayleigh dispersion curves in the period range 5–149 s. Data are extracted from seismic ambient noise recorded at 1521 broad-band stations, including the AlpArray network. The dispersion curves are first combined in a linearized least squares inversion to obtain 2-D maps of group velocity at each period. Love and Rayleigh maps are then jointly inverted at depth for shear wave velocity and radial anisotropy using a Bayesian Monte Carlo scheme that accounts for the trade-off between radial anisotropy and horizontal layering. The isotropic part of our model is consistent with previous studies. However, our anisotropy maps differ from previous large scale studies that suggested the presence of significant radial anisotropy everywhere in the European crust and shallow upper mantle. We observe instead that radial anisotropy is mostly localized beneath the Apennines while most of the remaining European crust and shallow upper mantle is isotropic. We attribute this difference to trade-offs between radial anisotropy and thin (hectometric) layering in previous studies based on least-squares inversions and long period data (〉30 s). In contrast, our approach involves a massive data set of short period measurements and a Bayesian inversion that accounts for thin layering. The positive radial anisotropy (VSH 〉 VSV) observed in the lower crust of the Apennines cannot result from thin layering. We rather attribute it to ductile horizontal flow in response to the recent and present-day extension in the region.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Format: archive
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2024-02-07
    Description: To constrain seismic anisotropy under and around the Alps in Europe, we study SKS shear wave splitting from the region densely covered by the AlpArray seismic network. We apply a technique based on measuring the splitting intensity, constraining well both the fast orientation and the splitting delay. Four years of teleseismic earthquake data were processed, from 723 temporary and permanent broad-band stations of the AlpArray deployment including ocean-bottom seismometers, providing a spatial coverage that is unprecedented. The technique is applied automatically (without human intervention), and it thus provides a reproducible image of anisotropic structure in and around the Alpine region. As in earlier studies, we observe a coherent rotation of fast axes in the western part of the Alpine chain, and a region of homogeneous fast orientation in the Central Alps. The spatial variation of splitting delay times is particularly interesting though. On one hand, there is a clear positive correlation with Alpine topography, suggesting that part of the seismic anisotropy (deformation) is caused by the Alpine orogeny. On the other hand, anisotropic strength around the mountain chain shows a distinct contrast between the Western and Eastern Alps. This difference is best explained by the more active mantle flow around the Western Alps. The new observational constraints, especially the splitting delay, provide new information on Alpine geodynamics.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Format: archive
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2023-02-12
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in the surrounding and within different wind farms of the German Bight in April 2018. The sediment samples were taken by a box grab and analyzed for their grain size distribution by laser diffraction.
    Keywords: AT261; Atair; Atair261; Atair261_10_BC; Atair261_11_BC; Atair261_13_BC; Atair261_14_BC; Atair261_15_BC; Atair261_16_BC; Atair261_17_BC; Atair261_2_BC; Atair261_20_BC; Atair261_21_BC; Atair261_22_BC; Atair261_23_BC; Atair261_24_BC; Atair261_25_BC; Atair261_27_BC; Atair261_29_BC; Atair261_3_BC; Atair261_30_BC; Atair261_31_BC; Atair261_32_BC; Atair261_33_BC; Atair261_34_BC; Atair261_35_BC; Atair261_36_BC; Atair261_37_BC; Atair261_38_BC; Atair261_39_BC; Atair261_4_BC; Atair261_40_BC; Atair261_41_BC; Atair261_42_BC; Atair261_43_BC; Atair261_44_BC; Atair261_46_BC; Atair261_47_BC; Atair261_48_BC; Atair261_49_BC; Atair261_50_BC; Atair261_51_BC; Atair261_52_BC; Atair261_53_BC; Atair261_54_BC; Atair261_55_BC; Atair261_56_BC; Atair261_57_BC; Atair261_58_BC; Atair261_59_BC; Atair261_60_BC; Atair261_61_BC; Atair261_62_BC; Atair261_63_BC; Atair261_9_BC; BC; Box corer; Date/Time of event; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Elevation of event; Event label; German Bight; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Laser diffraction particle size analyser; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; Sample ID; Size fraction 〈 0.020 mm; Size fraction 〈 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay; Size fraction 〈 0.125 mm; Size fraction 〈 0.250 mm; Station_10_HELW3; Station_11_NOST1; Station_13_NOST3; Station_14_NOST4; Station_15_NOST5; Station_16_NOST6; Station_17_NOST7; Station_2_TI7; Station_20_AMWE2; Station_21_AMWE3; Station_22_AMWE4; Station_23_AMWE5; Station_24_AMWE6; Station_25_AMWE7; Station_27_AMWE9; Station_29_DOLW1; Station_3_MEWI1; Station_30_DOLW2; Station_31_DOLW3; Station_32_BKRI1; Station_33_BKRI2; Station_34_BKRI3; Station_35_BKRI4; Station_36_BKRI5; Station_37_ALVE2; Station_38_ALVE3; Station_39_ALVE1; Station_4_MEWI3; Station_40_ALVE4; Station_41_DOLW5; Station_42_DOLW6; Station_43_GOWI2; Station_44_GOWI3; Station_46_GOWI6; Station_47_GOWI7; Station_48_GOWI8; Station_49_GOWI9; Station_50_GOWI1; Station_51_GOWI4; Station_52_GOWI10; Station_53_GOWI11; Station_54_GOWI20; Station_55_GOWI21; Station_56_GOWI22; Station_57_GOWI23; Station_58_GOWI24; Station_59_GOWI25; Station_60_GOWI26; Station_61_GOWI27; Station_62_GOWI28; Station_63_GOWI29; Station_9_HELW2; Station label
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 312 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2023-09-12
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in the surrounding and within different wind farms of the German Bight in April 2018 within the context of the Hereon-BSH project OffChEm. The surface sediment samples were taken by a box grab, homogenized, freeze-dried and wet-sieved to gain the 〈20 µm grain size fraction. The 〈20 µm grain size fraction was acid digested and measured by ICP-MS/MS for their (trace) metal mass fractions. The Sr and Pb isotope ratios were measured by MC ICP-MS after an automated matrix separation with a prepFAST MC system.
    Keywords: Aluminium; Aluminium, limit of detection; Aluminium, limit of quantification; Aluminium, uncertainty; Antimony; Antimony, limit of detection; Antimony, limit of quantification; Antimony, uncertainty; Arsenic; Arsenic, limit of detection; Arsenic, limit of quantification; Arsenic, uncertainty; AT261; Atair; Atair261; Atair261_10_BC; Atair261_11_BC; Atair261_13_BC; Atair261_14_BC; Atair261_15_BC; Atair261_16_BC; Atair261_17_BC; Atair261_2_BC; Atair261_20_BC; Atair261_21_BC; Atair261_22_BC; Atair261_23_BC; Atair261_24_BC; Atair261_25_BC; Atair261_27_BC; Atair261_29_BC; Atair261_3_BC; Atair261_30_BC; Atair261_31_BC; Atair261_32_BC; Atair261_33_BC; Atair261_34_BC; Atair261_35_BC; Atair261_36_BC; Atair261_37_BC; Atair261_38_BC; Atair261_39_BC; Atair261_4_BC; Atair261_40_BC; Atair261_41_BC; Atair261_42_BC; Atair261_43_BC; Atair261_44_BC; Atair261_46_BC; Atair261_47_BC; Atair261_48_BC; Atair261_49_BC; Atair261_50_BC; Atair261_51_BC; Atair261_52_BC; Atair261_53_BC; Atair261_54_BC; Atair261_55_BC; Atair261_56_BC; Atair261_57_BC; Atair261_58_BC; Atair261_59_BC; Atair261_60_BC; Atair261_61_BC; Atair261_62_BC; Atair261_63_BC; Atair261_9_BC; Barium; Barium, limit of detection; Barium, limit of quantification; Barium, uncertainty; BC; Beryllium; Beryllium, limit of detection; Beryllium, limit of quantification; Beryllium, uncertainty; Bismuth; Bismuth, limit of detection; Bismuth, limit of quantification; Bismuth, uncertainty; Box corer; Cadmium; Cadmium, limit of detection; Cadmium, limit of quantification; Cadmium, uncertainty; Caesium; Caesium, limit of detection; Caesium, limit of quantification; Caesium, uncertainty; Calcium; Calcium, limit of detection; Calcium, limit of quantification; Calcium, uncertainty; Cerium; Cerium, limit of detection; Cerium, limit of quantification; Cerium, uncertainty; Chromium; Chromium, limit of detection; Chromium, limit of quantification; Chromium, uncertainty; Cobalt; Cobalt, limit of detection; Cobalt, limit of quantification; Cobalt, uncertainty; DATE/TIME; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Dysprosium; Dysprosium, limit of detection; Dysprosium, limit of quantification; Dysprosium, uncertainty; Element analysis grain size fraction 〈 20 microns via ICP-MS (total digest); ELEVATION; Erbium; Erbium, limit of detection; Erbium, limit of quantification; Erbium, uncertainty; Europium; Europium, limit of detection; Europium, limit of quantification; Europium, uncertainty; Event label; Gadolinium; Gadolinium, limit of detection; Gadolinium, limit of quantification; Gadolinium, uncertainty; Gallium; Gallium, limit of detection; Gallium, limit of quantification; Gallium, uncertainty; German Bight; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Holmium; Holmium, limit of detection; Holmium, limit of quantification; Holmium, uncertainty; Indium; Indium, limit of detection; Indium, limit of quantification; Indium, uncertainty; Iron; Iron, limit of detection; Iron, limit of quantification; Iron, uncertainty; Lanthanum; Lanthanum, limit of detection; Lanthanum, limit of quantification; Lanthanum, uncertainty; LATITUDE; Lead; Lead, limit of detection; Lead, limit of quantification; Lead, uncertainty; Lead-206/Lead-204 ratio; Lead-206/Lead-204 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-207/Lead-204 ratio; Lead-207/Lead-204 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-207/Lead-206, uncertainty; Lead-207/Lead-206 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-204 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-204 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-208/Lead-206 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-206 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-208/Lead-207 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-207 ratio, uncertainty; Lithium; Lithium, limit of detection; Lithium, limit of quantification; Lithium, uncertainty; LONGITUDE; Lutetium; Lutetium, limit of detection; Lutetium, limit of quantification; Lutetium, uncertainty; Magnesium; Magnesium, limit of detection; Magnesium, limit of quantification; Magnesium, uncertainty; Manganese; Manganese, limit of detection; Manganese, limit of quantification; Manganese, uncertainty; Molybdenum; Molybdenum, limit of detection; Molybdenum, limit of quantification; Molybdenum, uncertainty; Multi-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICP-MS), Nu Plasma II, Wrexham, UK; External intra-elemental calibration using NIST SRM 981; Multi-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICP-MS), Nu Plasma II, Wrexham, UK; External intra-elemental calibration using NIST SRM 987; Neodymium; Neodymium, limit of detection; Neodymium, limit of quantification; Neodymium, uncertainty; Nickel; Nickel, limit of detection; Nickel, limit of quantification; Nickel, uncertainty; Potassium; Potassium, limit of detection; Potassium, limit of quantification; Potassium, uncertainty; Praseodymium; Praseodymium, limit of detection; Praseodymium, limit of quantification; Praseodymium, uncertainty; Rubidium; Rubidium, limit of detection; Rubidium, limit of quantification; Rubidium, uncertainty; Samarium; Samarium, limit of detection; Samarium, limit of quantification; Samarium, uncertainty; Sample ID; Sample method; Scandium; Scandium, limit of detection; Scandium, limit of quantification; Scandium, uncertainty; Silver; Silver, limit of detection; Silver, limit of quantification; Silver, uncertainty; Station_10_HELW3; Station_11_NOST1; Station_13_NOST3; Station_14_NOST4; Station_15_NOST5; Station_16_NOST6; Station_17_NOST7; Station_2_TI7; Station_20_AMWE2; Station_21_AMWE3; Station_22_AMWE4; Station_23_AMWE5; Station_24_AMWE6; Station_25_AMWE7; Station_27_AMWE9; Station_29_DOLW1; Station_3_MEWI1; Station_30_DOLW2; Station_31_DOLW3; Station_32_BKRI1; Station_33_BKRI2; Station_34_BKRI3; Station_35_BKRI4; Station_36_BKRI5; Station_37_ALVE2; Station_38_ALVE3; Station_39_ALVE1; Station_4_MEWI3; Station_40_ALVE4; Station_41_DOLW5; Station_42_DOLW6; Station_43_GOWI2; Station_44_GOWI3; Station_46_GOWI6; Station_47_GOWI7; Station_48_GOWI8; Station_49_GOWI9; Station_50_GOWI1; Station_51_GOWI4; Station_52_GOWI10; Station_53_GOWI11; Station_54_GOWI20; Station_55_GOWI21; Station_56_GOWI22; Station_57_GOWI23; Station_58_GOWI24; Station_59_GOWI25; Station_60_GOWI26; Station_61_GOWI27; Station_62_GOWI28; Station_63_GOWI29; Station_9_HELW2; Station label; Strontium; Strontium, limit of detection; Strontium, limit of quantification; Strontium, uncertainty; Strontium-87/Strontium-86 ratio; Strontium-87/Strontium-86 ratio, uncertainty; Terbium; Terbium, limit of detection; Terbium, limit of quantification; Terbium, uncertainty; Thallium; Thallium, limit of detection; Thallium, limit of quantification; Thallium, uncertainty; Thulium; Thulium, limit of detection; Thulium, limit of quantification; Thulium, uncertainty; Titanium; Titanium, limit of detection; Titanium, limit of quantification; Titanium, uncertainty; Tungsten; Tungsten, limit of detection; Tungsten, limit of quantification; Tungsten, uncertainty; Uranium; Uranium, limit of detection; Uranium, limit of quantification; Uranium, uncertainty; Vanadium; Vanadium, limit of detection; Vanadium, limit of quantification; Vanadium, uncertainty; Ytterbium; Ytterbium, limit of detection; Ytterbium, limit of quantification; Ytterbium, uncertainty; Zinc; Zinc, limit of detection; Zinc, limit of quantification; Zinc, uncertainty
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 9992 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2024-03-05
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in and around offshore wind farms of the German Bight between 06.03.2019 and 24.03.2019 within the context of the Hereon-BSH project OffChEm. The surface sediment samples were taken by a box grab, homogenized, freeze-dried and wet-sieved to gain the 〈20 µm grain size fraction. The 〈20 µm grain size fraction was acid digested and measured by ICP-MS/MS for their (trace) metal mass fractions. The Sr and Pb isotope ratios were measured by MC ICP-MS after an automated matrix separation with a prepFAST MCTM system.
    Keywords: Aluminium; Aluminium, limit of detection; Aluminium, limit of quantification; Aluminium, uncertainty; Arsenic; Arsenic, limit of detection; Arsenic, limit of quantification; Arsenic, uncertainty; AT275; AT275_Stat_S_097_HELW5; Atair; Atair275; Atair275_11; Atair275_12; Atair275_13; Atair275_14; Atair275_17; Atair275_18; Atair275_19; Atair275_2; Atair275_20; Atair275_21; Atair275_22; Atair275_23; Atair275_24; Atair275_25; Atair275_26; Atair275_27; Atair275_28; Atair275_29; Atair275_30; Atair275_31; Atair275_32; Atair275_33; Atair275_34; Atair275_35; Atair275_36; Atair275_39; Atair275_4; Atair275_40; Atair275_41; Atair275_42; Atair275_43; Atair275_44; Atair275_45; Atair275_46; Atair275_47; Atair275_48; Atair275_49; Atair275_5; Atair275_52; Atair275_53; Atair275_54; Atair275_55; Atair275_56; Atair275_57; Atair275_58; Atair275_60; Atair275_61; Atair275_62; Atair275_64; Atair275_65; Atair275_67; Atair275_68; Atair275_69; Atair275_7; Atair275_70; Atair275_71; Atair275_72; Atair275_73; Atair275_75; Atair275_78; Atair275_79; Atair275_8; Atair275_80; Atair275_81; Atair275_82; Atair275_83; Atair275_84; Atair275_85; Atair275_86; Atair275_87; Atair275_88; Atair275_89; Atair275_9; Atair275_91; Atair275_92; Atair275_93; Atair275_94; Atair275_95; Atair275_96; Atair275_97; Barium; Barium, limit of detection; Barium, limit of quantification; Barium, uncertainty; Beryllium; Beryllium, limit of detection; Beryllium, limit of quantification; Beryllium, uncertainty; Bismuth; Bismuth, limit of detection; Bismuth, limit of quantification; Bismuth, uncertainty; Cadmium; Cadmium, limit of detection; Cadmium, limit of quantification; Cadmium, uncertainty; Caesium; Caesium, limit of detection; Caesium, limit of quantification; Caesium, uncertainty; Calcium; Calcium, limit of detection; Calcium, limit of quantification; Calcium, uncertainty; Cerium; Cerium, limit of detection; Cerium, limit of quantification; Cerium, uncertainty; Chromium; Chromium, limit of detection; Chromium, limit of quantification; Chromium, uncertainty; Cobalt; Cobalt, limit of detection; Cobalt, limit of quantification; Cobalt, uncertainty; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Dysprosium; Dysprosium, limit of detection; Dysprosium, limit of quantification; Dysprosium, uncertainty; Element analysis grain size fraction 〈 20 microns via ICP-MS (total digest); Erbium; Erbium, limit of detection; Erbium, limit of quantification; Erbium, uncertainty; Europium; Europium, limit of detection; Europium, limit of quantification; Europium, uncertainty; Event label; Gadolinium; Gadolinium, limit of detection; Gadolinium, limit of quantification; Gadolinium, uncertainty; Gallium; Gallium, limit of detection; Gallium, limit of quantification; Gallium, uncertainty; Germanium; Germanium, limit of detection; Germanium, limit of quantification; Germanium, uncertainty; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Holmium; Holmium, limit of detection; Holmium, limit of quantification; Holmium, uncertainty; Indium; Indium, limit of detection; Indium, limit of quantification; Indium, uncertainty; International Generic Sample Number; Iron; Iron, limit of detection; Iron, limit of quantification; Iron, uncertainty; Lanthanum; Lanthanum, limit of detection; Lanthanum, limit of quantification; Lanthanum, uncertainty; Lead; Lead, limit of detection; Lead, limit of quantification; Lead, uncertainty; Lead-206/Lead-204 ratio; Lead-206/Lead-204 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-207/Lead-204 ratio; Lead-207/Lead-204 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-207/Lead-206 ratio; Lead-207/Lead-206 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-208/Lead-204 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-204 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-208/Lead-206 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-206 ratio, uncertainty; Lead-208/Lead-207 ratio; Lead-208/Lead-207 ratio, uncertainty; Lithium; Lithium, limit of detection; Lithium, limit of quantification; Lithium, uncertainty; Lutetium; Lutetium, limit of detection; Lutetium, limit of quantification; Lutetium, uncertainty; Magnesium, limit of detection; Magnesium, limit of quantification; Magnesium, uncertainty; Manganese; Manganese, limit of detection; Manganese, limit of quantification; Manganese, uncertainty; Mercury; Mercury, limit of detection; Mercury, limit of quantification; Mercury, uncertainty; Molybdenum; Molybdenum, limit of detection; Molybdenum, limit of quantification; Molybdenum, uncertainty; MULT; Multi-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICP-MS), Nu Plasma II, Wrexham, UK; External intra-elemental calibration using NIST SRM 981; Multi-collector ICP-MS (MC-ICP-MS), Nu Plasma II, Wrexham, UK; External intra-elemental calibration using NIST SRM 987; Multiple investigations; Neodymium; Neodymium, limit of detection; Neodymium, limit of quantification; Neodymium, uncertainty; Nickel; Nickel, limit of detection; Nickel, limit of quantification; Nickel, uncertainty; Niobium; Niobium, limit of detection; Niobium, limit of quantification; Niobium, uncertainty; North Sea; Phosphorus; Phosphorus, limit of detection; Phosphorus, limit of quantification; Phosphorus, uncertainty; Potassium; Potassium, limit of detection; Potassium, limit of quantification; Potassium, uncertainty; Praseodymium; Praseodymium, limit of detection; Praseodymium, limit of quantification; Praseodymium, uncertainty; Rubidium; Rubidium, limit of detection; Rubidium, limit of quantification; Rubidium, uncertainty; S_002_AMWE4; S_004_AMWE3; S_005_AMWE7; S_007_AMWE5; S_008_AMWE6; S_009_AMWE15; S_011_AMWE19; S_012_AMWE20; S_013_AMWE21; S_014_AMWE22; S_017_NOST4; S_018_NOST1; S_019_NOST5; S_020_NOST6; S_021_NOST7; S_022_NOST3; S_023_NOST42; S_024_NOST43; S_025_NOST35; S_026_TI7; S_027_MEWI1; S_028_MEWI3; S_029_MEWI6; S_030_TI13; S_031_MEWI7; S_032_MEWI36; S_033_MEWI37; S_034_MEWI38; S_035_MEWI40; S_036_MEWI41; S_039_DOLW1; S_040_ALVE5; S_041_ALVE4; S_042_ALVE2; S_043_ALVE3; S_044_ALVE1; S_045_BKRI5; S_046_BKRI4; S_047_BKRI3; S_048_BKRI2; S_049_BKRI1; S_052_GOWI10; S_053_GOWI6; S_054_GOWI7; S_055_GOWI9; S_056_GOWI11; S_057_GOWI4; S_058_GOWI3; S_060_GOWI2; S_061_GOWI1; S_062_GOWI8; S_064_GOWI54; S_065_GOWI59; S_067_GOWI26; S_068_GOWI24; S_069_GOWI21; S_070_GOWI25; S_071_GOWI20; S_072_GOWI22; S_073_GOWI23; S_075_GOWI29; S_078_GOWI55; S_079_GOWI57; S_080_DOLW7; S_081_VEJA02; S_082_VEJA03; S_083_VEJA04; S_084_VEJA05; S_085_VEJA06; S_086_VEJA08; S_087_VEJA09; S_088_VEJA10; S_089_VEJA11; S_091_DOLW8; S_092_DOLW10; S_093_DOLW9; S_094_VEJA16; S_095_HELW1; S_096_HELW4; Samarium; Samarium, limit of detection; Samarium, limit of quantification; Samarium, uncertainty; Sample code/label; Sample method; Scandium; Scandium, limit of detection; Scandium, limit of quantification; Scandium, uncertainty; Selenium; Selenium, limit of detection; Selenium, limit of quantification; Selenium, uncertainty; Silver; Silver, limit of detection; Silver, limit of quantification; Silver, uncertainty; Sodium; Sodium, limit of detection; Sodium, limit of quantification; Sodium, uncertainty; Station label; Strontium; Strontium, limit of detection; Strontium, limit of quantification; Strontium, uncertainty; Strontium-87/Strontium-86 ratio; Strontium-87/Strontium-86 ratio, uncertainty; Tantalum; Tantalum, limit of detection; Tantalum, limit of quantification; Tantalum, uncertainty; Tellurium; Tellurium, limit of detection; Tellurium, limit of quantification; Tellurium, uncertainty; Terbium; Terbium, limit of detection; Terbium, limit of quantification; Terbium, uncertainty; Thallium; Thallium, limit of detection; Thallium, limit of quantification; Thallium, uncertainty; Thorium; Thorium, limit of detection; Thorium, limit of quantification; Thorium, uncertainty; Thulium; Thulium, limit of detection; Thulium, limit of quantification; Thulium, uncertainty; Titanium; Titanium, limit of detection; Titanium, limit of quantification; Titanium, uncertainty; Tungsten; Tungsten, limit of detection; Tungsten, limit of quantification; Tungsten, uncertainty; Uranium; Uranium, limit of detection; Uranium, limit of quantification; Uranium, uncertainty; Vanadium; Vanadium, limit of detection; Vanadium, limit
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 17568 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    Publication Date: 2024-03-05
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in and around offshore wind farms of the German Bight between 06.03.2019 and 24.03.2019.
    Keywords: ALTITUDE; AT275; AT275_Stat_S_097_HELW5; Atair; Atair275; Atair275_11; Atair275_12; Atair275_13; Atair275_14; Atair275_15; Atair275_16; Atair275_17; Atair275_18; Atair275_19; Atair275_2; Atair275_20; Atair275_21; Atair275_22; Atair275_23; Atair275_24; Atair275_25; Atair275_26; Atair275_27; Atair275_28; Atair275_29; Atair275_30; Atair275_31; Atair275_32; Atair275_33; Atair275_34; Atair275_35; Atair275_36; Atair275_39; Atair275_4; Atair275_40; Atair275_41; Atair275_42; Atair275_43; Atair275_44; Atair275_45; Atair275_46; Atair275_47; Atair275_48; Atair275_49; Atair275_5; Atair275_52; Atair275_53; Atair275_54; Atair275_55; Atair275_56; Atair275_57; Atair275_58; Atair275_6; Atair275_60; Atair275_61; Atair275_62; Atair275_64; Atair275_65; Atair275_67; Atair275_68; Atair275_69; Atair275_7; Atair275_70; Atair275_71; Atair275_72; Atair275_73; Atair275_75; Atair275_78; Atair275_79; Atair275_8; Atair275_80; Atair275_81; Atair275_82; Atair275_83; Atair275_84; Atair275_85; Atair275_86; Atair275_87; Atair275_88; Atair275_89; Atair275_9; Atair275_90; Atair275_91; Atair275_92; Atair275_93; Atair275_94; Atair275_95; Atair275_96; Atair275_97; Conductivity; Date/Time of event; DEPTH, water; Elevation of event; Event label; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; MULT; Multimeter; Multiple investigations; North Sea; Oxygen, dissolved; pH; Pressure, atmospheric; S_002_AMWE4; S_004_AMWE3; S_005_AMWE7; S_006_ANWE8; S_007_AMWE5; S_008_AMWE6; S_009_AMWE15; S_011_AMWE19; S_012_AMWE20; S_013_AMWE21; S_014_AMWE22; S_015_NOST4_WH; S_016_HELW1_WH; S_017_NOST4; S_018_NOST1; S_019_NOST5; S_020_NOST6; S_021_NOST7; S_022_NOST3; S_023_NOST42; S_024_NOST43; S_025_NOST35; S_026_TI7; S_027_MEWI1; S_028_MEWI3; S_029_MEWI6; S_030_TI13; S_031_MEWI7; S_032_MEWI36; S_033_MEWI37; S_034_MEWI38; S_035_MEWI40; S_036_MEWI41; S_039_DOLW1; S_040_ALVE5; S_041_ALVE4; S_042_ALVE2; S_043_ALVE3; S_044_ALVE1; S_045_BKRI5; S_046_BKRI4; S_047_BKRI3; S_048_BKRI2; S_049_BKRI1; S_052_GOWI10; S_053_GOWI6; S_054_GOWI7; S_055_GOWI9; S_056_GOWI11; S_057_GOWI4; S_058_GOWI3; S_060_GOWI2; S_061_GOWI1; S_062_GOWI8; S_064_GOWI54; S_065_GOWI59; S_067_GOWI26; S_068_GOWI24; S_069_GOWI21; S_070_GOWI25; S_071_GOWI20; S_072_GOWI22; S_073_GOWI23; S_075_GOWI29; S_078_GOWI55; S_079_GOWI57; S_080_DOLW7; S_081_VEJA02; S_082_VEJA03; S_083_VEJA04; S_084_VEJA05; S_085_VEJA06; S_086_VEJA08; S_087_VEJA09; S_088_VEJA10; S_089_VEJA11; S_090_VEJA12; S_091_DOLW8; S_092_DOLW10; S_093_DOLW9; S_094_VEJA16; S_095_HELW1; S_096_HELW4; Sample ID; Station label; Temperature, air; Temperature, water; Wind speed
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 908 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    Publication Date: 2024-03-05
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in and around offshore wind farms of the German Bight between 06.03.2019 and 24.03.2019.
    Keywords: Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon
    Type: Dataset
    Format: application/zip, 2 datasets
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2024-03-05
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in and around offshore wind farms of the German Bight between 06.03.2019 and 24.03.2019 within the context of the Hereon-BSH project OffChEm. The water samples were taken in metal-free GO-FLO sampling bottles, filtered over 〈0.45 µm polycarbonate filters into pre-cleaned LDPE bottles and acidified with nitric acid. The filtrates were then measured for their (trace) metal concentrations with ICP-MS/MS coupled online to a seaFAST preconcentration and matrix removal system.
    Keywords: Aluminium; Aluminium, standard deviation; AT275; AT275_Stat_S_097_HELW5; Atair; Atair275; Atair275_11; Atair275_12; Atair275_13; Atair275_14; Atair275_15; Atair275_16; Atair275_17; Atair275_18; Atair275_19; Atair275_2; Atair275_20; Atair275_21; Atair275_22; Atair275_23; Atair275_24; Atair275_25; Atair275_26; Atair275_27; Atair275_28; Atair275_29; Atair275_30; Atair275_31; Atair275_32; Atair275_33; Atair275_34; Atair275_35; Atair275_36; Atair275_39; Atair275_4; Atair275_40; Atair275_41; Atair275_42; Atair275_43; Atair275_44; Atair275_45; Atair275_46; Atair275_47; Atair275_48; Atair275_49; Atair275_5; Atair275_52; Atair275_53; Atair275_54; Atair275_55; Atair275_56; Atair275_57; Atair275_58; Atair275_6; Atair275_60; Atair275_61; Atair275_64; Atair275_65; Atair275_67; Atair275_68; Atair275_69; Atair275_7; Atair275_70; Atair275_71; Atair275_72; Atair275_73; Atair275_75; Atair275_78; Atair275_79; Atair275_8; Atair275_80; Atair275_81; Atair275_82; Atair275_83; Atair275_84; Atair275_85; Atair275_86; Atair275_87; Atair275_88; Atair275_89; Atair275_9; Atair275_90; Atair275_91; Atair275_92; Atair275_93; Atair275_94; Atair275_95; Atair275_96; Atair275_97; Cadmium; Cadmium, standard deviation; Cerium; Cerium, standard deviation; Cobalt; Cobalt, standard deviation; Copper; Copper, standard deviation; Date/Time of event; DEPTH, water; Dysprosium; Dysprosium, standard deviation; Elevation of event; Erbium; Erbium, standard deviation; Europium; Europium, standard deviation; Event label; Gadolinium; Gadolinium, anthropogenic; Gadolinium, anthropogenic, uncertainty; Gadolinium, standard deviation; Gadolinium anomaly; Gadolinium anomaly, uncertainty; Gallium; Gallium, standard deviation; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Holmium; Holmium, standard deviation; ICP-MS, Elemental Scientific, seaFAST; Indium; Indium, standard deviation; International Generic Sample Number; Iron; Iron, standard deviation; Lanthanum; Lanthanum, standard deviation; Latitude of event; Lead; Lead, standard deviation; Longitude of event; Lutetium; Lutetium, standard deviation; Manganese; Manganese, standard deviation; Molybdenum; Molybdenum, standard deviation; MULT; Multiple investigations; Neodymium; Neodymium, standard deviation; Nickel; Nickel, standard deviation; North Sea; Praseodymium; Praseodymium, standard deviation; Quality assessment; S_002_AMWE4; S_004_AMWE3; S_005_AMWE7; S_006_ANWE8; S_007_AMWE5; S_008_AMWE6; S_009_AMWE15; S_011_AMWE19; S_012_AMWE20; S_013_AMWE21; S_014_AMWE22; S_015_NOST4_WH; S_016_HELW1_WH; S_017_NOST4; S_018_NOST1; S_019_NOST5; S_020_NOST6; S_021_NOST7; S_022_NOST3; S_023_NOST42; S_024_NOST43; S_025_NOST35; S_026_TI7; S_027_MEWI1; S_028_MEWI3; S_029_MEWI6; S_030_TI13; S_031_MEWI7; S_032_MEWI36; S_033_MEWI37; S_034_MEWI38; S_035_MEWI40; S_036_MEWI41; S_039_DOLW1; S_040_ALVE5; S_041_ALVE4; S_042_ALVE2; S_043_ALVE3; S_044_ALVE1; S_045_BKRI5; S_046_BKRI4; S_047_BKRI3; S_048_BKRI2; S_049_BKRI1; S_052_GOWI10; S_053_GOWI6; S_054_GOWI7; S_055_GOWI9; S_056_GOWI11; S_057_GOWI4; S_058_GOWI3; S_060_GOWI2; S_061_GOWI1; S_064_GOWI54; S_065_GOWI59; S_067_GOWI26; S_068_GOWI24; S_069_GOWI21; S_070_GOWI25; S_071_GOWI20; S_072_GOWI22; S_073_GOWI23; S_075_GOWI29; S_078_GOWI55; S_079_GOWI57; S_080_DOLW7; S_081_VEJA02; S_082_VEJA03; S_083_VEJA04; S_084_VEJA05; S_085_VEJA06; S_086_VEJA08; S_087_VEJA09; S_088_VEJA10; S_089_VEJA11; S_090_VEJA12; S_091_DOLW8; S_092_DOLW10; S_093_DOLW9; S_094_VEJA16; S_095_HELW1; S_096_HELW4; Samarium; Samarium, standard deviation; Sample code/label; Station label; Terbium; Terbium, standard deviation; Thulium; Thulium, standard deviation; Tin; Tungsten; Tungsten, standard deviation; Uranium; Uranium, standard deviation; Vanadium; Vanadium, standard deviation; Ytterbium; Ytterbium, standard deviation; Yttrium; Yttrium, standard deviation; Zinc; Zinc, standard deviation
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 5499 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 9
    Publication Date: 2024-03-05
    Description: Offshore wind energy is a steadily growing sector contributing to the worldwide energy production. The impact of these offshore constructions on the marine environment, however, remains unclear in many aspects. In fact, little is known about potential emissions from corrosion protection systems such as organic coatings or galvanic anodes composed of Al and Zn alloys, used to protect offshore structures. In order to assess potential chemical emissions from offshore wind farms and their impact on the marine environment water and sediment samples were taken in and around offshore wind farms of the German Bight between 06.03.2019 and 24.03.2019. The sediment samples were taken by a box grab and analyzed for their grain size distribution by laser diffraction.
    Keywords: AT275; AT275_Stat_S_097_HELW5; Atair; Atair275; Atair275_11; Atair275_12; Atair275_13; Atair275_14; Atair275_17; Atair275_18; Atair275_19; Atair275_2; Atair275_20; Atair275_21; Atair275_22; Atair275_23; Atair275_24; Atair275_25; Atair275_26; Atair275_27; Atair275_28; Atair275_29; Atair275_30; Atair275_31; Atair275_32; Atair275_33; Atair275_34; Atair275_35; Atair275_36; Atair275_39; Atair275_4; Atair275_40; Atair275_41; Atair275_42; Atair275_43; Atair275_44; Atair275_45; Atair275_46; Atair275_47; Atair275_48; Atair275_49; Atair275_5; Atair275_52; Atair275_53; Atair275_54; Atair275_55; Atair275_56; Atair275_57; Atair275_58; Atair275_60; Atair275_61; Atair275_62; Atair275_64; Atair275_65; Atair275_67; Atair275_68; Atair275_69; Atair275_7; Atair275_70; Atair275_71; Atair275_72; Atair275_73; Atair275_75; Atair275_78; Atair275_79; Atair275_8; Atair275_80; Atair275_81; Atair275_82; Atair275_83; Atair275_84; Atair275_85; Atair275_86; Atair275_87; Atair275_88; Atair275_89; Atair275_9; Atair275_91; Atair275_92; Atair275_93; Atair275_94; Atair275_95; Atair275_96; Atair275_97; Date/Time of event; DEPTH, sediment/rock; Elevation of event; Event label; Grain size, LASER Particle Sizer; Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon; Hereon; Latitude of event; Longitude of event; MULT; Multiple investigations; North Sea; S_002_AMWE4; S_004_AMWE3; S_005_AMWE7; S_007_AMWE5; S_008_AMWE6; S_009_AMWE15; S_011_AMWE19; S_012_AMWE20; S_013_AMWE21; S_014_AMWE22; S_017_NOST4; S_018_NOST1; S_019_NOST5; S_020_NOST6; S_021_NOST7; S_022_NOST3; S_023_NOST42; S_024_NOST43; S_025_NOST35; S_026_TI7; S_027_MEWI1; S_028_MEWI3; S_029_MEWI6; S_030_TI13; S_031_MEWI7; S_032_MEWI36; S_033_MEWI37; S_034_MEWI38; S_035_MEWI40; S_036_MEWI41; S_039_DOLW1; S_040_ALVE5; S_041_ALVE4; S_042_ALVE2; S_043_ALVE3; S_044_ALVE1; S_045_BKRI5; S_046_BKRI4; S_047_BKRI3; S_048_BKRI2; S_049_BKRI1; S_052_GOWI10; S_053_GOWI6; S_054_GOWI7; S_055_GOWI9; S_056_GOWI11; S_057_GOWI4; S_058_GOWI3; S_060_GOWI2; S_061_GOWI1; S_062_GOWI8; S_064_GOWI54; S_065_GOWI59; S_067_GOWI26; S_068_GOWI24; S_069_GOWI21; S_070_GOWI25; S_071_GOWI20; S_072_GOWI22; S_073_GOWI23; S_075_GOWI29; S_078_GOWI55; S_079_GOWI57; S_080_DOLW7; S_081_VEJA02; S_082_VEJA03; S_083_VEJA04; S_084_VEJA05; S_085_VEJA06; S_086_VEJA08; S_087_VEJA09; S_088_VEJA10; S_089_VEJA11; S_091_DOLW8; S_092_DOLW10; S_093_DOLW9; S_094_VEJA16; S_095_HELW1; S_096_HELW4; Sample ID; Size fraction 〈 0.020 mm; Size fraction 〈 0.020 mm, standard deviation; Size fraction 〈 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay; Size fraction 〈 0.063 mm, mud, silt+clay, standard deviation; Size fraction 〈 0.125 mm; Size fraction 〈 0.125 mm, standard deviation; Size fraction 〈 0.250 mm; Size fraction 〈 0.250 mm, standard deviation; Station label
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 800 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 10
    Publication Date: 2024-02-24
    Description: This dataset is a synthesis of published nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes from permafrost-affected soils in Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine permafrost regions. The data includes mean N2O flux rates measured under field (in situ) conditions and in intact plant-soil systems (mesocosms) under near-field conditions. The dataset further includes explanatory environmental parameters such as meteorological data, soil physical-chemical properties, as well as site and experimental information. Data has been synthesized from published studies (see 'Further details'), and in some cases the authors of published studies have been contacted for additional site-level information. The dataset includes studies published until 2019. We encourage linking additional N2O flux data from unpublished and future studies with similar metadata structure to this dataset, to produce a comprehensive, findable database for N2O fluxes from permafrost regions.
    Keywords: Abisko_N2O; Alexandra_Fjord_N2O; Ammonium; Analytical method; Antarctica; Ardley_Island_N2O; Area/locality; Boniface_River_N2O; Canada; Cape_Bounty_N2O; Carbon/Nitrogen ratio; China; Churchill_N2O; Country; Daring_Lake_N2O; Daxing-an_Mountains_N2O; Day; Denmark; Density, active layer, bulk; Disturbance Type; Dome_Desert_N2O; Eagle_Plains_N2O; Eboling_Mountains_N2O; Ecosystem; Event label; Expedition_Fjord_N2O; Experimental treatment; Fenghuo_Mountains_N2O; Fildes_Peninsula_N2O; Finland; Garwood_Valley_N2O; Geermu_N2O; Great_Hing-an_Mountains_N2O; Haibei_N2O; Hemeroby/disturbance; Inner_Mongolia_N2O; Kilpisjaervi_N2O; LATITUDE; Location; LONGITUDE; Luanhaizi_N2O; Month; Nagqu_N2O; Nitrate; Nitrogen, soil; Nitrous oxide, flux, in mass nitrous oxide; Niwot_Ridge_N2O; Norway; Number of measurements; Number of measurement seasons; Number of points; Ny-Alesund_N2O; Okse_Bay_N2O; Organic carbon, soil; Original unit; Original value; Patterson_River_N2O; Permafrost extent; pH, soil; Precipitation, annual mean; Presence/absence; Publication of data; Reference of data; Replicates; Russia; Sample code/label; Seida_I_N2O; Seida_II_N2O; Site; Sodankylae_N2O; Soil moisture; Soil organic matter; Soil water content, gravimetric; Soil water content, volumetric; Sweden; Temperature, air; Temperature, air, annual mean; Temperature, soil; Thaw depth of active layer, maximum; Thaw depth of active layer, mean; Time in minutes; Truelove_Lowland_N2O; Tura_N2O; Type of chamber; Type of study; United States of America; Utsjoki_N2O; Vegetation type; Water filled pore space; Water filled pore space, calculated; Water holding capacity; Wudaoliang_N2O; Yakutsk_N2O; Year of observation; Yukon_Delta_N2O; Zackenberg_N2O; Zone
    Type: Dataset
    Format: text/tab-separated-values, 10302 data points
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...