Publication Date:
2020-11-05
Description:
Introduction: Ph-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are a group of clonal stem-cell disorders with an elevated risk for thrombosis. Leukocytosis is a well-known risk factor for thrombosis. Neutrophils from MPN patients display features of activation. On stimulation, neutrophils produce neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of thrombosis. Myeloperoxidase-conjugated DNA levels (a specific NET marker) have been found increased in plasma of thrombotic MPN patients (Guy, A, ISTH 2019 OC 77.3). Ex vivo, activated neutrophils from JAK2V617F patients are primed to form NETs, diminishing under ruxolitinib treatment. Mice with conditional knock-in of JAK2V617F have increased NETs formation and thrombotic events. Inhibition of JAK/STAT signaling by ruxolitinib abrogated NETs formation and reduced thrombosis in this murine model (Wolach, O,Sci. Transl. Med. 2018). Thus, a link between JAK2V617F expression, NETs formation and thrombosis has been suggested (Wolach, O, 2018). It remains unclear whether, in MPN patients, JAK/STAT independent pathways are implicated in the NETs formation. With this aim, we explored the effects of different cytoreductors in NETs formation. Patients and Methods: In a multicentric study conducted at Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer (Murcia, Spain) and Hospital del Mar (Barcelona, Spain), EDTA plasma samples were collected from MPN patients (n=104). Patients include polycythemia vera (PV, n=35, all of them JAK2V617F), essential thrombocythemia [ET, n=47; 38 JAK2V617F, 4 CALRmut, 5 triple negative (TN)], myelofibrosis (MF, n=9; 4 JAK2V617F, 2 CALRmut, 3 TN), and unclassifiable MPN by WHO-2016 (MPN-u, n=13; 12 JAK2V617F, 1 CALRmut). Samples were collected at different time points following up the disease: at diagnosis or before any cytoreductive treatment, time 0, (n=100), less than 6 months of treatment (time 6; n=60), from 6 to 12 months of treatment (time 12; n=60), and from 12 to 24 months of treatment (time 24; n=49). Among the 104 patients, we had clinical information about treatment on 99 cases, included hydroxyurea (HU, n=69), ruxolitinib (n=15), IFN-α (n=2), and non-treated (n=13, all basal samples). We measured citH3-DNA complexes, as specific marker of NETs, by ELISA using rabbit anti-citH3 (Abcam) and peroxidase-conjugated anti-DNA antibody (Cell Death Detection ELISA). The absorbance at 405 nm (A405) was measured in a plate reader (Biotek®). Thus, we followed up the NETosis marker evolution with treatment over time. One-tailed and paired Wilcoxon test was applied and p
Print ISSN:
0006-4971
Electronic ISSN:
1528-0020
Topics:
Biology
,
Medicine
Permalink