ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
  • 2015-2019  (2)
  • 2018  (1)
  • 2017  (1)
Collection
Years
  • 2015-2019  (2)
Year
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    AGU (American Geophysical Union) | Wiley
    In:  Earth's Future, 6 (3). pp. 565-582.
    Publication Date: 2021-02-08
    Description: To maintain the chance of keeping the average global temperature increase below 2 degrees C and to limit long-term climate change, removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (carbon dioxide removal, CDR) is becoming increasingly necessary. We analyze optimal and cost-effective climate policies in the dynamic integrated assessment model (IAM) of climate and the economy (DICE2016R) and investigate (1) the utilization of (ocean) CDR under different climate objectives, (2) the sensitivity of policies with respect to carbon cycle feedbacks, and (3) how well carbon cycle feedbacks are captured in the carbon cycle models used in state-of-the-art IAMs. Overall, the carbon cycle model in DICE2016R shows clear improvements compared to its predecessor, DICE2013R, capturing much better long-term dynamics and also oceanic carbon outgassing due to excess oceanic storage of carbon from CDR. However, this comes at the cost of a (too) tight short-term remaining emission budget, limiting the model suitability to analyze low-emission scenarios accurately. With DICE2016R, the compliance with the 2 degrees C goal is no longer feasible without negative emissions via CDR. Overall, the optimal amount of CDR has to take into account (1) the emission substitution effect and (2) compensation for carbon cycle feedbacks.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Format: text
    Format: other
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  (PhD/ Doctoral thesis), Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Germany, 137 pp
    Publication Date: 2020-02-06
    Description: The Paris Agreement of 2015 has set the specific target to limit mean global warming to well below 2°C, if not 1.5 °C above preindustrial levels in order to avoid the most dangerous consequences of anthropogenic climate change (UNFCCC, 2015). The accomplishment of this target very likely depends on the future deployment of both carbon capture and storage (CCS) and intentional carbon dioxide removal (CDR), which are measures that deliberately remove CO2 from the atmosphere and store it somewhere else (e.g., Fuss et al., 2014; Gasser et al., 2015), e.g., in geological formations or the deep ocean (e.g., IPCC, 2005). To date, the technological development and feasibility of such methods are in their infancy and thus uncertain regarding their effectiveness, costs, side effects, and carbon-cycle implications (e.g., Field and Mach, 2017). A proposed carbon storage method for CO2 captured from large point sources such as power plants or via some CDR method is ocean carbon sequestration by direct CO2 injection into the deep ocean. This carbon storage method aims at the deliberate acceleration of the natural oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2 by discharging it directly into the deep ocean (Marchetti, 1977; see section 1.3). Chapters 2 - 4 of this thesis revisit this idea and provide a novel evaluation of direct CO2 injection into the deep ocean that goes well beyond previous assessments.
    Type: Thesis , NonPeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...