Publication Date:
2019-07-13
Description:
The ground-based network that has been in existence for several decades is described. Attention is given to two basic questions, namely the way in which monthly satellite analyses compare with those from the ground-based network and the way in which the trends from the satellite and ground-based data compare. Synoptic analyses of total ozone for December 1970 are compared with a subjective analysis of the ground-based network and an objective backscatter ultraviolet (BUV) analysis. It is found that the BUV analysis is the more consistent of the two. Considering monthly analyses for September 1970, satellite and ground-based data are found to agree quite well. In considering the question of trend determination by the ground-based versus the satellite systems, attention is given to the sources of error in the satellite system. The principal sources of error in BUV analysis are thought to be calibration drift with time and the fact that, over the lifetime of the satellite spacecraft, power limitations result in a decrease in the number of data points per month, possibly with significant gaps in the coverage.
Keywords:
GEOPHYSICS
Type:
In: Quadrennial International Ozone Symposium; Aug 04, 1980 - Aug 09, 1980; Boulder, CO
Format:
text
Permalink