ALBERT

Description: Radon isotopes (222Rn, 220Rn) are noble, naturally occurring radioactive gases. They originate from the alpha decay of radium isotopes (226Ra, 224Ra), which occur in most materials in the environment, i.e. soil, rocks, raw and building materials. Radon is also found in ground and tap water. The two radon isotopes are chemically identical, but they have very different halflives: 3.82 days for radon (222Rn) and 56 seconds for thoron (220Rn). Thus, they behave very differently in the environment. Both isotopes are alpha-emitters; their decay products are polonium, bismuth and lead isotopes. The main source of radon in air (indoor or outdoor) is soil, where radon concentrations are very high and reach tens of Bq/m3. Radon release from soil into the atmosphere depends on radium (226Ra) concentration in soil, soil parameters (porosity, density, humidity) and weather conditions (e.g. air temperature and pressure, wind, precipitation). Outdoor radon concentrations are relatively low and change daily and seasonally. These changes may be used to study the movement of air masses and other climatic conditions. Radon gas enters buildings (homes, workplaces) through cracks, crevices and leaks that occur in foundations and connections between different materials in the building. This is due to temperature and pressure differences between indoors and outdoors. Indoor radon is the most important source of radiation exposure to the public, especially on ground floor. Radon and its decay products represent the main contributor to the effective dose of ionising radiation that people receive. Radon is generally considered as the second cause of increased risk of lung cancer (after smoking). The only way to assess indoor radon concentration is to make measurements. Different methods exist, but the most common one is to use track-etched detectors. Such detectors may be used to perform longterm (e.g. annual) measurements in buildings. The exposure time is important because indoor radon levels change daily and seasonally. Moreover, radon concentration shows a high spatial variation on a local scale, and is strongly connected with geological structure, building characteristics and ventilation habits of occupants. A European map of indoor radon concentration has been prepared and is displayed. It is derived from survey data received from 35 countries participating on a voluntary basis.

Description: Published

Description: 108-137

Description: 6A. Geochimica per l'ambiente e geologia medica

Description: Simulating complex physical systems often involves solving partial differential equations (PDEs) with some closures due to the presence of multi-scale physics that cannot be fully resolved. Although the advancement of high performance computing has made resolving small-scale physics possible, such simulations are still very expensive. Therefore, reliable and accurate closure models for the unresolved physics remains an important requirement for many computational physics problems, e.g., turbulence simulation. Recently, several researchers have adopted generative adversarial networks (GANs), a novel paradigm of training machine learning models, to generate solutions of PDEs-governed complex systems without having to numerically solve these PDEs. However, GANs are known to be difficult in training and likely to converge to local minima, where the generated samples do not capture the true statistics of the training data. In this work, we present a statistical constrained generative adversarial network by enforcing constraints of covariance from the training data, which results in an improved machine-learning-based emulator to capture the statistics of the training data generated by solving fully resolved PDEs. We show that such a statistical regularization leads to better performance compared to standard GANs, measured by (1) the constrained model's ability to more faithfully emulate certain physical properties of the system and (2) the significantly reduced (by up to 80%) training time to reach the solution. We exemplify this approach on the Rayleigh-Bénard convection, a turbulent flow system that is an idealized model of the Earth's atmosphere. With the growth of high-fidelity simulation databases of physical systems, this work suggests great potential for being an alternative to the explicit modeling of closures or parameterizations for unresolved physics, which are known to be a major source of uncertainty in simulating multi-scale physical systems, e.g., turbulence or Earth's climate.

Description: “Artificial Intelligence for Cold Regions” (AI-CORE) is a collaborative project of the German Aerospace Center (DLR), the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI), the Technical University Dresden (TU Dresden), and is funded by the Helmholtz Foundation since early 2020. The project aims at developing artificial intelligence methods for addressing some of the most challenging research questions in remote sensing of the cryosphere. Rapidly changing ice sheets and thawing permafrost are big societal challenges, hence quantifying these changes and understanding the mechanisms are of major importance. Given the vast extent of polar regions and the availability of exponentially increasing satellite remote sensing data, intelligent data analysis is urgently required to exploit the full information in satellite time series. This is where AI-CORE comes into play: Four geoscientific use cases have been defined, including a) change pattern identification of outlet glaciers in Greenland; b) object identification in permafrost areas; c) edge detection of calving fronts of glaciers/ice shelves in Antarctica; d) firn line detection and monitoring: The glacier mass balance indicator. For these four use cases, AI-methods are being developed to allow for an accurate, efficient, and automated extraction of the desired parameters. Once these methods have been successfully developed, they will be implemented in processing infrastructures at AWI, TU Dresden, and DLR, and subsequently made available to other research institutes. The presentation will outline the specific goals and challenges of the four use cases as well as the current state of the developments and preliminary results.

Description: We present an analysis of annual and seasonal mean characteristics of the Indian Ocean circulation and water masses from 16 global ocean–sea-ice model simulations that follow the Coordinated Ocean-ice Reference Experiments (CORE) interannual protocol (CORE-II). All simulations show a similar large-scale tropical current system, but with differences in the Equatorial Undercurrent. Most CORE-II models simulate the structure of the Cross Equatorial Cell (CEC) in the Indian Ocean. We uncover a previously unidentified secondary pathway of northward cross-equatorial transport along 75 °E, thus complementing the pathway near the Somali Coast. This secondary pathway is most prominent in the models which represent topography realistically, thus suggesting a need for realistic bathymetry in climate models. When probing the water mass structure in the upper ocean, we find that the salinity profiles are closer to observations in geopotential (level) models than in isopycnal models. More generally, we find that biases are model dependent, thus suggesting a grouping into model lineage, formulation of the surface boundary, vertical coordinate and surface salinity restoring. Refinement in model horizontal resolution (one degree versus degree) does not significantly improve simulations, though there are some marginal improvements in the salinity and barrier layer results. The results in turn suggest that a focus on improving physical parameterizations (e.g. boundary layer processes) may offer more near-term advances in Indian Ocean simulations than refined grid resolution.

Description: We present a new framework for global ocean–sea-ice model simulations based on phase 2 of the Ocean Model Intercomparison Project (OMIP-2), making use of the surface dataset based on the Japanese 55-year atmospheric reanalysis for driving ocean–sea-ice models (JRA55-do). We motivate the use of OMIP-2 over the framework for the first phase of OMIP (OMIP-1), previously referred to as the Coordinated Ocean–ice Reference Experiments (COREs), via the evaluation of OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations from 11 state-of-the-science global ocean–sea-ice models. In the present evaluation, multi-model ensemble means and spreads are calculated separately for the OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations and overall performance is assessed considering metrics commonly used by ocean modelers. Both OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 multi-model ensemble ranges capture observations in more than 80 % of the time and region for most metrics, with the multi-model ensemble spread greatly exceeding the difference between the means of the two datasets. Many features, including some climatologically relevant ocean circulation indices, are very similar between OMIP-1 and OMIP-2 simulations, and yet we could also identify key qualitative improvements in transitioning from OMIP-1 to OMIP-2. For example, the sea surface temperatures of the OMIP-2 simulations reproduce the observed global warming during the 1980s and 1990s, as well as the warming slowdown in the 2000s and the more recent accelerated warming, which were absent in OMIP-1, noting that the last feature is part of the design of OMIP-2 because OMIP-1 forcing stopped in 2009. A negative bias in the sea-ice concentration in summer of both hemispheres in OMIP-1 is significantly reduced in OMIP-2. The overall reproducibility of both seasonal and interannual variations in sea surface temperature and sea surface height (dynamic sea level) is improved in OMIP-2. These improvements represent a new capability of the OMIP-2 framework for evaluating process-level responses using simulation results. Regarding the sensitivity of individual models to the change in forcing, the models show well-ordered responses for the metrics that are directly forced, while they show less organized responses for those that require complex model adjustments. Many of the remaining common model biases may be attributed either to errors in representing important processes in ocean–sea-ice models, some of which are expected to be reduced by using finer horizontal and/or vertical resolutions, or to shared biases and limitations in the atmospheric forcing. In particular, further efforts are warranted to resolve remaining issues in OMIP-2 such as the warm bias in the upper layer, the mismatch between the observed and simulated variability of heat content and thermosteric sea level before 1990s, and the erroneous representation of deep and bottom water formations and circulations. We suggest that such problems can be resolved through collaboration between those developing models (including parameterizations) and forcing datasets. Overall, the present assessment justifies our recommendation that future model development and analysis studies use the OMIP-2 framework.