ALBERT

Description: Realistically representing the land–atmosphere interactions during persistent cold-air pools (PCAPs) is critical in simulating the strength of PCAPs, where uncertainties in simulating the PCAP strength will impact the ability to model the poor air quality. To quantify the model performance for land–atmosphere exchange, measurements of surface turbulent and radiative energy fluxes during two PCAPs, one weak and one strong, in Utah were compared with simulations from the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model. The results show that the WRF Model simulated the surface energy fluxes well in the weak PCAP case and that the performance degraded in the strong PCAP case. The significantly overestimated surface sensible heat flux H and latent heat flux (LE) in the strong PCAP were related, in part, to the overestimated net radiation and soil moisture and unsuitable turbulence parameterizations. The simulation using the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino planetary boundary layer scheme produced the least bias in both net radiation and surface turbulent fluxes for the strong PCAP case, which is expected because of the local higher-order (2.5) turbulence closure scheme. The surface exchange coefficient (CH), a crucial variable used to calculate H, was overall overestimated by the WRF Model. The underestimation of the nondimensional vertical temperature gradient in the Monin–Obukhov stability function was responsible for the overestimated CH, where the stability functions deviate significantly from expected values from observations for the stable atmospheric boundary layer. Our study highlights the need to improve the flux–profile parameterizations under stable conditions over complex terrain by including impacts due to mountainous terrain, such as surface radiative flux divergence and the diurnal mountain wind system.