ALBERT

Description: This paper presents an improved methodology for evaluating the position and orientation errors of airfoil sections of a manufactured aero-engine blade. The existing method estimates these errors by finding rigid-body transformations with translational and rotational parameters altogether to best match the inspection data points onto the design airfoil profiles. Such transformations lead to unreliable evaluation results due to combining the position and orientation errors with each other. This paper proposes to decouple the position and orientation errors in their evaluation in order to avoid the combining effect. To isolate the position error from the orientation error, an important location tolerance evaluation feature, the centroid of a manufactured airfoil section, must be correctly identified from the sectional inspection data points. Identifying the centroid location directly from discrete data points is subject to an error caused by biased area calculations on the pressure and suction sides of an airfoil. This work proposes to reconstruct a valid airfoil profile from the inspection data points for each airfoil section to overcome the area bias problem and to maintain consistency in identifying the centroid. With the centroid of each inspected airfoil section identified, the position error and the orientation error can then be evaluated in sequence. A series of case studies has been performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology and how it is able to prevent wrongful rejection/acceptance of geometrically acceptable/unacceptable blades as well as incorrect modification of the related manufacturing processes.