ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    AGU (American Geophysical Union)
    In:  Water Resources Research, 30 (4). pp. 965-973.
    Publication Date: 2016-06-14
    Description: The accuracy of the Darcy velocity, flux, and stream function computed from lowest-order, triangle-based, control volume and mixed finite element approximations to the two-dimensional pressure equation is considered. The control volume finite element method, similar to integrated finite difference methods and analogous to the interpolation of Galerkin finite element results over “control volumes,” is shown to yield a conservative velocity field and smooth streamlines. The streamlines and fluxes through the system computed with the control volume finite element approach are compared to those computed from the mixed finite element method, which approximates the pressure and velocity variables separately. It is shown that for systems with only moderate degrees of heterogeneity, the control volume finite element method is the more computationally efficient alternative; i.e., it provides more accurate flow results for a given number of unknowns. For more variable or discontinuous permeability fields, by contrast, such as sand/shale systems, the mixed finite element method is shown to approximate flow variables more accurately and more realistically than the control volume method with the same number of unknowns.
    Type: Article , PeerReviewed
    Format: text
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...