ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2015-12-03
    Description: Background: Proteasome-inhibitor (PI) based therapy is highly effective and widely utilized in the treatment of Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia (WM), though published data on the long-term impact of PI-based therapy, including treatment-related peripheral neuropathy and secondary malignancies remains limited. Methods: We performed a prospective, multicenter study of bortezomib, dexamethasone and rituximab (BDR) in symptomatic, previously untreated WM patients. Treatment consisted of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 administered intravenously along with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 4, 8, and 11; and rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 11 as part of a 21-day cycle for 4 consecutive cycles as induction therapy. Maintenance therapy followed 12 weeks after induction therapy, and consisted of one cycle of BDR therapy every 12 weeks for a total of 4 cycles. Dose reduction or drug omission was permitted for toxicity. Herpes zoster prophylaxis and H2-blocker were required. Results: Twenty-three patients received a median of seven cycles of treatment. The median baseline characteristics were as follows: age 66 years; bone marrow involvement 55%; serum IgM 4,830 mg/dL; serum IgA 45 mg/dL; serum IgG 418 mg/dL; hemoglobin 10.1 g/dL; and B2M 3.3 mg/L. Extramedullary disease was present in 4 (17%) patients. Following treatment, median serum IgM levels declined to 557 mg/dL (p2 toxicities were as follows: peripheral neuropathy (N=16); neutropenia (N=13); infections without neutropenia (N=13); thrombocytopenia (N=10) and steroid related hyperglycemia (N=6). Discontinuance of bortezomib occurred in 14 (60%) patients for peripheral neuropathy; dexamethasone for steroid intolerance in 3 (13%) patients; and rituximab for antibody-related neutropenia in one patient (4%). For the 16 patients experiencing bortezomib related peripheral neuropathy, neuropathic complaints resolved (N=8); decreased to Grade 1 (N=5); remained unchanged (N=2); or were unevaluable (N=1) with prolonged follow-up. Conclusions: BDR is a highly effective regimen producing high overall and major response rates, as well as long progression-free and overall survival intervals in previously untreated, symptomatic patients with WM. No unexpected toxicities were encountered. Secondary malignancies did not appear associated with protocol therapy. Reversible neurotoxicity constituted the most common adverse event associated with BDR using a twice-weekly schedule of administration of bortezomib, and resulted in high rates of proteasome-inhibitor discontinuance. Efforts to identify more neuropathy sparing approaches, including alternative schedules and routes of bortezomib administration, as well as novel neuropathy sparing proteasome-inhibitors are warranted given these encouraging long-term efficacy findings in WM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...