Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sulphur uptake from the atmosphere by forest and farmland

Abstract

MEASUREMENTS of sulphur uptake by plants are needed to aid our understanding of the long-range transport of sulphur dioxide and the role of sulphur uptake in acidification and the nutrient balance of forest ecosystems1. The traditional profile method of analysing sulphur uptake has proved inadequate for forest measurements because the vertical concentration gradients above forests are small and difficult to measure with current techniques2; the best estimates available are based on extrapolation of measurements from individual shoots to the whole forest3. We report here the first direct measurements of the uptake of sulphur from the atmosphere by a forest in the absence of precipitation (that is, dry deposition). These measurements were possible because of the development of a fast response sulphur detector which allowed, for the first time, use of the eddy correlation method4 for sulphur uptake measurements. The sulphur uptake ranged from 0–0.1 µg m−2 s−1 (as SO2) for atmospheric sulphur concentrations up to 35 µg m−3 (expressed as SO2). On average, 75% of the atmospheric sulphur was in gaseous form. These uptake rates support those derived from use of the recent hypothesis that sulphur dioxide uptake by vegetation takes place through the stomatal opening for a dry canopy3. Some measurements of dry uptake of sulphur over farmland were also made and are in close agreement with published measurements made over similar surfaces using the profile and other methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Department of Environment, Pollution Paper No. 7, Effects of Airborne Sulphur Compounds on Forests and Freshwater (HMSO, 1976).

  2. Garland, J. A. Proc. R. Soc. A 354, 245 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Garland, J. A. & Branson, J. R. Tellus 29, 445 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Priestley, C. H. B. Turbulent Transfer in the Lower Atmosphere (University of Chicago Press, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desjardin, R. L. & Lemon, E. R. Boundary-Layer Met. 5, 475 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Galbally, I. E. Adv. Geophys. 18B, 329 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hicks, B. B. Boundary-Layer Met. 3, 214 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garratt, J. R. Boundary-Layer Met. 8, 255 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hadjitofi, A. & Wilson, M. J. G. Atmos. Envir. (in the press).

  10. McBean, G. A. J. appl. Met. 11, 1078 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dyer, A. J. & Garratt, J. R. J. met. Soc., Japan 56, 19 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dyer, A. J. & Hicks, B. B. Q. Jl R. met. Soc. 98, 206 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wyngaard, J. C. in Workshop on Micrometeorology (ed. Haugen, D. A.) (Am. Met. Soc., 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sreenivasan, K. R., Chambers, A. J. & Antonia, R. A. Boundary-Layer Met. 14, 341 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wesely, M. L., Hicks, B. B., Dannevik, W. P., Frisella, S. & Husar, R. B. Atmos. Envir. 11, 561 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gash, J. H. C. & Stewart, J. B. Boundary-Layer Met. 8, 453 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GALBALLY, I., GARLAND, J. & WILSON, M. Sulphur uptake from the atmosphere by forest and farmland. Nature 280, 49–50 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280049a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280049a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing