Summary
We provide a new proof for the optimality of deductible insurance that does not depend on the expected-utility hypothesis. Our model uses only first- and second-degree stochastic dominance arguments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. J.: Essays in the theory of risk bearing. Chicago: Markham 1971
Arrow, K. J.: Optimal insurance and generalized deductibles. Scand. Act. J.1, 1–42 (1974)
Blazenko, G.: Optimal indemnity contracts. Insurance Math. Econ.4, 267–278 (1985)
Buhlmann, H., Jewell, W. S.: Optimal risk exchange. Astin Bull.10, 243–262 (1979)
Doherty, N. A., Schlesinger, H.: Rational insurance purchasing: Consideration of contract nonperformance. Q. J. Econ.105, 143–153 (1990)
Gollier, C: The design of optimal insurance without the nonnegativity constraint on claims. J. Risk Insurance,54, 312–24 (1987a)
Gollier, C: Pareto-optimal risk sharing with fixed costs per claim. Scand. Act. J.13, 63–73 (1987b)
Gollier, C: Economic theory of risk exchanges: A review. In: Dionne, G. (ed.) Contribution to insurance economics. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992
Gollier, C., Schlesinger, H.: Second-best insurance contract design in an incomplete market. Scand. J. Econ. forthcoming
Karni, E.: Optimal insurance: A nonexpected utility analysis. In: Dionne, G. (ed.) Contributions to insurance economics, pp. 217–238. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1992
Machina, M. J.: Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica50, 277–323 (1982)
Mossin, J.: Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. J. Polit. Econ.91, 304–311 (1968)
Raviv, A.: The design of an optimal insurance policy. Am. Econ. Rev.69, 84–96 (1979)
Rothschild, M., Stiglitz, J.: Increasing risk: I. A definition. J. Econ. Theory2, 225–243 (1970)
Safra, Z., Zilcha, I.: Efficient sets with and without the expected utility hypothesis. J. Math. Econ.17, 369–384 (1988)
Segal, U., Spivak, A.: First order versus second order risk aversion. J. Econ. Theory51, 111–125 (1990)
Zilcha, I., Chew, S. H.: Invariance of the efficient sets when the expected utility hypothesis is relaxed. J. Econ. Behav. Organiz.13, 125–131 (1990)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This paper was partially written while Schlesinger was visiting at the University of Toulouse. Financial support for this visit from the Fédération Francaise des Société d' Assurance is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also thank Louis Eeckhoudt, Ed Schlee and an anonymous referee for helpful comments.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gollier, C., Schlesinger, H. Arrow's theorem on the optimality of deductibles: A stochastic dominance approach. Econ Theory 7, 359–363 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213911
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01213911