Skip to main content
Log in

Pollution, food safety, and the distribution of knowledge

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human perceptions of the relationship between pollution and food safety are often haphazard and contradictory, based on a variety of sources of information. Recent media events concerning seafood and coastal pollution have generated concern that an otherwise healthy food— fish and shellfish—has become dangerous. We assess consumer knowledge about seafood safety and coastal pollution using several methods, including tests of cultural consensus. We find that consumers view seafood as far more threatened by pollution than scientific analysis suggests, due in part to their perceptions about the dynamics of the marine environment. Finding variation in perceptions within our population based on income and other factors, we explore the use of the cultural consensus approach in large and heterogeneous populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belshem, M. (1991). Cancer, control, and causality: Talking about cancer in a working-class community.American Ethnologist 18(1):152–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S. (1986). Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna manioc cultivators.American Anthropologist 88:428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S., and Johnson, J. C. (1989). Form or function: A comparison of expert and novice judgement of similarity among fish.American Anthropologist 91(4):866–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984).Distinctions: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (translated by Richard Nice). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. (1963).Silent Spring. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Reports (1992). Is Our Fish Fit to Eat?

  • D'Andrade, R. (1972). A prepositional analysis of U.S. American beliefs about illness. In Basso, K., and Selby, H. (eds.),Meaning in Anthropology. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1971).History of Sexuality (Vol. 1). Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garro, L. C. (1988). Explaining high blood pressure: Variation in knowledge about illness.American Ethnologist 15(1):98–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In Geertz, C. (ed.),The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books, New York, pp. 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971).Selections from the Prison Notebooks. International Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. C., Johnson, J. C., Murray, J. D., and Kemp, S. (1988).Social and Cultural Dimensions of Consumer Knowledge Among-Seafood and Seafood Analog Consumers in the Southeast: Implications for Consumer Education. Technical Report to the Gulf and South Atlantic Fisheries Development Foundation.

  • Holland, D. (1987). Culture sharing across gender lines.American Behavioral Scientist 31(2):234–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, K., and Romney, A. K. (1990). Consensus on semiotic models of alphabetic systems.Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 2(4):289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. C., and Griffith, D. C. (1985). Perceptions and Preferences for Marine Recreational Fish. UNC Sea Grant Technical Report 85-01.

  • Keesing, R. (1987). Anthropology as interpretive quest.Current Anthropology 28(2): 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. (1987). Intracultural variation in Belrich about gender in a Mexican community.American Behavioral Scientist 31(2):219–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, H. (1992). The directive use of morality tales in a Mexican community. In D'Andrade, R., and Strauss, C. (eds.),Human Motives and Cultural Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. (1985).Sweetness and Power. Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences (1991).Seafood Safety. NAS: Institute of Medican, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Fisheries Institute (1991). Seafood Safety. NFE Papers.

  • National Marine Fisheries Service (1990).Fisheries Statistics of the United States, 1990. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (1992).Beyond Beef. Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romney, A. K., Weller, S. C., and Batchelder, W. H. (1986). Culture as a consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy.American Anthropologist 88:313–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, U. (1981).The Jungle. Bantam Books, New York (originally published in 1906).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. (1990). Fear and loathing of nuclear power.Science 4977(250):28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffler, V. J. (1972). Some applications of multidimensional scaling to social science problems. In Romney, A. K.et al (eds.),Multidimensional Scaling, Theory and Applications (Vol. 2). Seminar Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, C. (1990). Who Gets Ahead? Cognitive Responses to Heteroglossia in American Political Culture.American Ethnologist 17(2):312–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • USA Today (April 10, 1989). Seafood Safety Creates Ripples Among Restaurateurs, Price, Safety Put damper on Seafood Sales.

  • U.S. Congress (1986). Hearing before the subcommittee on health and the environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, p. 116.

  • Vickers, D. (1994).Farmers and Fishermen. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1977).Marxism and Literature. W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Post (January 21, 1989). On the Safe Side of Seafood: The Tricky Business of Policing the Fishing Industry; Catch as Catch Can: From Boat to Market, the Convoluted Tale of How a Fish Lands on Your Table.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, J.C., Griffith, D.C. Pollution, food safety, and the distribution of knowledge. Hum Ecol 24, 87–108 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02167962

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02167962

Key words

Navigation