Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of legislative inefficiency and ideological behavior

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the theory of legislative inefficiency and the role of ideological preferences of legislators. It is shown that inefficiency can be caused by many factors other than legislative ideological behavior. Three major sources are emphasized: cost of voting and policy position information asymmetries across groups of voters and barriers to entry in political competition. Ideological preferences of legislators is not a cause of inefficiency independently. Legislators who care about both policy and winning will give inefficient representation to their constituents only when groups of voters are prevented from participating equally in the legislative process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alesina, A. (1988). Credibility and policy convergence in a two-party system with rational voters. American Economic Review 78: 796–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Spear, S. (1989). An overlapping generations model of electoral competition. Journal of Public Economics (forthcoming).

  • Calvert, R. (1985). Robustnes of the multidimensional voting model: Candidates' motivations uncertainty, and convergence. American Political Science Review 29: 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, R.M. and Dalton, T.R. (1988). Entry barriers in politics and contestability of elections. Unpublished manuscript, Nicholls State University.

  • Coughlin, P. and Nitzan, S. (1981). Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and Nash social welfare maxima. Journal of Public Economics 15: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W.M. and Tollison, R.D. (1976). Campaign expenditures and political competition. Journal of Law and Economics 19: 177–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W.M., Deaton, T. and Tollison, R.D. (1977). Legislators as taxicabs: On the value of seats in the U.S. House of Representative. Economic Inquiry 15: 298–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougan, W.R. andd Munger, M.C. (1989). The rationality of ideology. Journal of Law and Economics 32: 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, U. (1987). A note of social welfare orderings. European Economic Review 31: 1145–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enelow, J.M. (1989). An expanded approach to analyzing policy-minded candidates. Paper presented at Annual Public Choice Society Meetings in Orlando, Florida.

  • Feld, S.L. and Grofman, B. (1981). Ideological consistency as a collective phenomenon. American Political Science Review 82: 773–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filer, J., Kenny, L. and Morton, R. (1989). Redistribution, income, and voting. Working paper, University of Florida.

  • Gevers, L. (1979). On interpersonal comparability and social welfare orderings. Econometrica 47: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, J.E., Jr. (1989). The revelation of information through the electoral process. Working paper, Johns Hopkins University.

  • Kalt, J.P. and Zupan, M.A. (1984). Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics. American Economic Review 74: 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J.P. and Zupan, M.A. (1990). The apparent ideological behavior of legislators: Testing for principal agent slack in political institutions. Journal of Law and Economics forthcoming.

  • Ledyard, J.O. (1984). The pure theory of large two-candidate elections. Public Choice 44: 7–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1986). Brand names and barriers to entry in political markets. Public Choice 51: 87–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1987a). Political cheating. Public Choice 52: 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. (1987b). The effects of nontransferable property rights on the efficiency of political markets. Journal of Public Economics 32: 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lott, J.R. and Reed, W.R. (1989). Shirking and sorting in a political market with finite-lived politicians. Public Choice 61: 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, R.B. (1987). A group majority voting model of public good provision. Social Choice and Welfare 4: 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R.G. and Wright, J.R. (1987). Voting cycles and the structure of individual preferences. Social Choice and Welfare 4: 173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27: 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, K.T. (1981). Dimensions of interest group evaluation of the U.S. Senate, 1969–1978. American Journal of Political Science 25: 49–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1965). Entry barriers in politics. American Economicc Review 55: 458–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1983). Candidate motivation: A synthesis of alternative theories. American Political Science Review 77: 142–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zechman, M.J. (1979). Dynamic models of the voter's decision calculus. Public Choice 34: 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morton, R.B. An analysis of legislative inefficiency and ideological behavior. Public Choice 69, 211–222 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123848

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123848

Keywords

Navigation