Skip to main content
Log in

The evaluation of selections of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) inmonoculture and in mixture with grass

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

  1. 1.

    Forty-nine clones and 25 families of white clover were tested in monoculture and in association with grass. The monoculture was mown only. The mixed cultivation was subdivided in a grazed part and a mown part.

  2. 2.

    Comparison of the families at the end of the second year after sowing showed rather low correlations for the characteristics area and density in monoculture and area in mixture. For height and type in monoculture and area in a mixture with grass correlations were even lower. The finer-leaved types of monoculture often performed better under mixture/grazing, but did not belong to the best. Under this kind of utilization the coarse Ladino types were frequently worse. They indeed often ranked among the worst. There was a very close relation between density and area in pasture. The correlation of area in mixture/mowing for the families of clover with area in monoculture was lower than the correlation between the same characteristic in mixture/grazing and monoculture. For the clones the correlation coefficients were lower than for the families. Among the characteristics themselves differences in correlations were found similar to those of the families.

  3. 3.

    For the best families in monoculture the correlation with growth in mixture is often higher than for the average of the other families.

  4. 4.

    In the second year after sowing the correlation between spread of clover in mixture/mowing and in mixture/grazing was very low.

  5. 5.

    Mass per area and density under monoculture in the year of sowing appeared to be moderately correlated with area under mixture/grazing in the second year after sowing as far as the families are concerned. For the best objects the correlation was higher. In a similar comparison area appeared to have much less significance than density.

  6. 6.

    Under grazing conditions the mother clones of the two best families showed the greatest number of surviving plants, indicating thus a clear inheritance of the competitive ability.

  7. 7.

    If breeding clover for cultivation with grass is intended, one must include clover/grass mixture in the selection scheme. Mixture/mowing and mixture/grazing require a rather great number of replications. Another disadvantage of testing under grazing is the need for cattle. On the other hand testing with a clover/grass association does not require so much weed control, which is a great advantage, ince weed control in a monoculture demands expensive labour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldrich, D. T. A., 1970. Interaction between nitrogen fertilizer use and productivity of white clover. Occ. Symp. br. Grassld Soc. 6: 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andries, A. & Slijcken, A.van, 1968. Witte klaver in grasland. Verslagen en navorsingen nr. 35: 13–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous, 1960. Handleiding voor veldproeven (Manual for field trials), 1960. Meded. Landbouw-voorlichtingsdienst 77. Den Haag, pp. 295.

  • Atwood, S. S. & Garber, R. J., 1942. The evaluation of individual plants of white clover for yielding ability in association with bluegrass. J. Am. Soc. Agric. 34: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhuis, J. A. & Kleter, H. J., 1965. Some effects of associated growth on grass and clover under field conditions. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13: 280–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, H., 1971. Statistik (I) für Psychologen, Pädagogen und Socialwissenschaftler. Stuttgart, pp. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, C. T., Chamblee, D. S. & Woodhouse, W. W., 1966. Influence of some environmental and management factors on the persistence of Ladino-clover in association with orchardgrass. Agron. J. 58: 487–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bland, B. F., 1967. The effect of cutting frequency and root segregation on the yield from perennial ryegrass-white clover associations. J. Agric. Sci. 69: 391–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. E., 1960. The assessment of breeder's material. Rep. Welsh Pl Breed. Stn: 31.

  • Davies, W. E. & Davies, D. R. E., 1967. Improving competitive ability in white clover. Rep. Welsh Pl. Breed Stn. 43–44.

  • Davies, W. E. & Young, N. R., 1967. The characteristics of European, Mediterranean and other populations of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Euphytica 16: 330–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. E., 1969. Review white clover breeding. Occ. Symp. br. Grassld Soc. 6: 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, G. E.van, 1963. Verslag van een bezoek aan enkele instituten in Frankrijk. Reisverslag, SVP Wageningen, pp. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J., 1971. Breeding for resistance to Heterodera in white clover. Euphytica 20: 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, J. & Dijk, G. E.van, 1966. Grassen en klavers in mengteelt. In: W., Lange, H., Lamberts & F., Wit (Ed.), Ontwikkelingen in de Plantenveredeling. p. 95–105. Stichting voor Plantenveredeling, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennik, G. C., 1960. De concurrentie tussen witte klaver en Engels raaigras bij verschillen in lichtintensiteit en vochtvoorziening. Meded. Inst. biol. scheik. Onderz. Wageningen 109; pp. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennik, G. C., 1965. The influence of management and nitrogen application on the botanical composition of grassland. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13: 222–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, P. B., Beinhart, G., Halpin, J. E. & Hollowell, E. A., 1963. Selection and evaluation of white clover clones. Crop Sci. 3: 83–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson P. B. & Hollowel E. A., 1966. White clover. Agric. Handb. USDA 314; pp. 33.

  • Harkess, R. D., Hunt, I. V., & Frame, J., 1970. The effect of variety and of companion grass on the productivity of white clover. Occ. Symp. br. Grassld Soc. 6: 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, M. L. 't, 1970. De toekomstige ontwikkeling van het graslandonderzoek, Versl. Ned. Ver. Voeder-en Weidebouw. To be published.

  • Hawkins, R. P., 1960. Investigation on local strains (varieties) of herbage plants. J.br. Grassld Soc.: 28–33.

  • Mitchell, K. J., 1955/56. Growth of pasture species. III. White clover subterranean clover and Lotus major. N. Z. Jl. Sci. Technol. 37: 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spedding, C. R. W., 1971. Grassland ecology. Oxford, pp. 221.

  • Wilkinson, S. R. & Gross, C. F., 1964. Competition for light, soil moisture and nutrients during Ladino clover establishment in orchard grass sod. Agron. J. 56:389–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, F., 1953. Enkele aantekeningen over de grassen-en klaververedeling in de Verenigde Staten. Reisverslag SVP, Wageningen, pp. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, F., 1966. Het blauwzuurgehalte van witte klaver. In. W., Lange, H., Lamberts & F., Wit (Ed.), Ontwikkelingen in de Plantenveredeling, p. 216–219. Stichting voor Plantenveredeling, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dijkstra, J., De Vos, A.L.F. The evaluation of selections of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) inmonoculture and in mixture with grass. Euphytica 21, 432–449 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039339

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00039339

Keywords

Navigation