Abstract
The probabilities associated with global warming damage are likely to be continuously revised in the light of new information. Such revisions of probability are the defining characteristic of ambiguity, as opposed to risk. This paper examines how climate change ambiguity may affect optimal greenhouse gas emission strategies, via the decision maker's attitude towards anticipated changes of damage probabilities. Two conceptualizations of ambiguity are distinguished, according to the emphasis placed on the ambiguity of priors or on the ambiguity of news, respectively. It is shown that the way in which ambiguity is viewed and the attitude taken towards it have a substantial influence on the optimal emission trajectory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cline, W. R. (1991), ‘Scientific Basis for the Greenhouse Effect’, The Economic Journal 101, 904–919.
Dobbs, I. M. (1991), ‘A Bayesian Approach to Decision-making under Ambiguity’, Economica 58, 417–440.
Fankhauser, S. (1994), ‘The Social Costs of Greenhouse Gas Emission: An Expected Value Approach’, The Energy Journal 15(2), 157–184.
Manne, A. S. and R. G. Richels (1992), Buying Greenhouse Insurance: The Economic Costs of Carbon Dioxide Emission Limits, The MIT Press, Cambridge, U.S.A.
Peck, S. C. and T. J. Teisberg (1993), ‘Global Warming Uncertainties and the Value of Information: An Analysis using CETA’, Resource and Energy Economics 15, 71–98.
Schauer, M. J. (1995), ‘Estimation of the Greenhouse Gas Externality with Uncertainty’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 71–82.
Welsch, H. (1995), ‘Greenhouse Gas Abatement under Ambiguity’, Energy Economics 17, 91–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eismont, O., Welsch, H. Optimal greenhouse gas emissions under various assessments of climate change ambiguity. Environmental and Resource Economics 8, 129–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357360
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357360