Skip to main content
Log in

Costing the traffic barrier effect: A contingent valuation survey

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When considering the environmental damage caused by road traffic, one traditionally focuses attention on the consequences of accidents, or on the impact of air and noise pollution. This somewhat narrow definition should be enlarged to capture other, more psychological nuisances. The barrier effect created by heavily travelled streets belongs to this group of nuisances, rarely described and never estimated in monetary terms. It particularly affects children, the disabled and elderly people for whom the street becomes too large to cross. In a survey carried out at Neuchâtel, Switzerland, a contingent market was proposed to suppress the barrier effect around the city centre. A valuation function to predict the bids is estimated and used to infer the annual cost of the nuisance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleyard, D. (1981),Livable Streets, Protected Neighborhoods, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbeitskreis Verkehr und Umwelt (1987),Fussgängerfreundliche Ampeln in Stadten und Dörfern November, Berlin.

  • Arrow, K. J., R. H. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993), ‘Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation’,Federal Register 58(10), 4602–4614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, G. E. and D. R. Cox (1964), ‘An Analysis of Transformations’,Journal of Royal Statistical Society B(2), 211–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, M., J. Adams and J. Whitelegg (1991),One False Move... A Study of Children's Independent Mobility, Policy Studies Institute (PSI) Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G. H., W. D. Schulze, D. Waldman, J. Irwin and D. Schenk (1991), ‘Sources of Error in Contingent Valuation’, in J. K. Doyle, S. R. Elliott, G. H. McClelland and W. D. Schulze, eds.,Valuing the Benefits of Groundwater Cleanup: Interin Report, U.S. Washington D.C.: Environmental Protection Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1990),Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pommerehne, W. W. and A. Roemer (1991),L'évaluation des gains d'une diminution d'un risque collectif: Le cas des déchets dangereux, Conférence ‘Economie et environment dans les années 90’, Université de Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soguel, N.C. Costing the traffic barrier effect: A contingent valuation survey. Environ Resource Econ 6, 301–308 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705983

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00705983

Key words

Navigation