Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating stochastic programming and decision tree techniques in land conversion problems

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is concerned with gradual land conversion problems, placing the main focus on the interaction between time and uncertainty. This aspect is extremely relevant since most decisions made in the field of natural resources and sustainable development are irreversible decisions. In particular, we discuss and develop a scenario-based multi-stage stochastic programming model in order to determine the optimal land portfolio in time, given uncertainty affecting the market. The approach is then integrated in a decision tree framework in order to account for domain specific (environmental) uncertainty that, diversely from market uncertainty, may depend on the decision taken. Although, the designed methodology has many general applications, in the present work we focus on a particular case study, concerning a semi-degraded natural park located in northern Italy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamowicz, W., P. Boxall, M. Williams, and J. Louviere, (1998). “Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1), 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K.J. and I. Fisher, (1974). “Environmental Preservation, Uncertainty, and Irreversibility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 88, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge, J.R. and F. Louveaux, (1997). Introduction to Stochastic Programming. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosetti, V. and V. Messina, (2002). “Modelling Flexibility in Land Allocation Problems.” to appear in Annals of Operations Research.

  • Bosetti, V. and V. Messina, (2002). “A Contingent Valuation Survey of Development Options for Ginostra and the Resulting Data.” http://www.life.disco.unimib.it.

  • Clarke, H.R. and W.J. Reed, (1990). “Land Development and Wilderness Conservation Policies Under Uncertainty: A Synthesis.” Natural Resource Modelling, 4, 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad J. (2000). “Wilderness: Options to Preserve, Extract, or Develop.” Resources and Energy Economics 22, 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, J.S. and C. Ramezani, (1998). “An Arbitrage-Free Approach to Quasi-Option Value.” Journal of Environmental Economics Management 35, 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, J.C., S.A. Ross, and M. Rubinstein, (1979). “Option Pricing: A Simplified Approach.” Journal of Financial Economics 7, 229–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis R.K. (1963). “The Value of Outdoor Recreation: An Economic Study of the Maine Woods.” Harvard University. Ph.D. dissertation.

  • Ellison E.F.D., M. Hajian, R. Levkovitz, I. Maros, G. Mitra, and D. e Sayers, (1999). “FortMP Manual”, OptiRisk Systems and Brunel University.

  • Gassmann, H.I. (1987). “Optimal Harvest of a Forest in the Presence of Uncertainty.” Working Paper 59 School of Business Administration Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

  • Gaston, K.J. et al. (1998). “Conservation Science and Action.” W.J. Sutherland and C.J. Bibby (ed.), Selecting area for conservation, ch. 9.

  • Henry, C. (1974). “Investment Decisions Under Uncertainty: The Irreversibility Effect.” American Economic Review 64, 1006–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyland, K. and S. Wallace, (2001). “Generating Decision Trees for multi-stage Decision Problems.” Management Science 47(2), 295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyland, K., S. Wallace and M. Kaut, (2003). “A Heuristic for Moment-Matching Scenario Generation.” Computational Optimization and Applications 24, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, P. (1998). “Financial Asset-Pricing theory and Stochastic Programming Models for Asset/Liability Management: A synthesis.” Management Science 44, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koivu, M. and T. Pennanen, (2002). “Integration Quadratures in Discretizations of Stochastic Programs.” SPEPS E-PRINT SERIES, 11.

  • Nelson, D.B. and K. Ramaswamy, (1990). “Simple Binomial Processes as Diffusion Approximations in Financial Models.” The Review of Financial Studies 2, 393–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflug, G.C. (2000). “Scenario Tree Generation for Multiperiod Financial Optimization By Optimal Discretization.” Mathematical Programming 89, 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piano di Settore, (2003). “Fruizione Sociale, Ricreativa e Culturale Del Parco Regionale Pineta di Appiano Gentile e Tradate.”

  • Scheinkman, J.A. and T. Zariphopoulou, (2001). “Optimal Environmental Management in the Presence of Irreversibilities.” Journal of Economic Theory 96, 180–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.E. and R.F. Nau, (1995). “Valuing Risky projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis.” Management Science 41, 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer P. (2000). “Windfalls For Wilderness: Land Protection And Land Value In The Green Mountains,” In Cole, David N.; McCool, Stephen F. Proceedings: Wilderness Science in a Time of Change. Proc. RMRS-P-00. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenzina Messina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Messina, V., Bosetti, V. Integrating stochastic programming and decision tree techniques in land conversion problems. Ann Oper Res 142, 243–258 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-6170-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-006-6170-2

Keywords

Navigation