SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

Title:	Benefits and shortcomings of non-destructive benthic imagery for monitoring hard-bottom habitats
Source:	Marine Pollution Bulletin [0025-326X] Beisiegel, Kolja yr:2017

Basic

Sorry, no full text available...

Please use the document delivery service (see below)

Holding information

Holdings in library search engine ALBERT

Document delivery

Request document via Library/Bibliothek

Users interested in this article also expressed an interest in the following:
description	1.	Duchêne, J C. "Development and validation of a video analysis software for marine benthic applications." Journal of marine systems 162 (2016): 4-17.
description	2.	Rush, S. "Challenges on providing conservation advice for a growing network of English Marine Protected Areas." Marine policy 83: 75-82.
description	3.	Canessa, S. "Dealing with Trade-Offs in Destructive Sampling Designs for Occupancy Surveys." PLoS One 10.3 (2015).
description	4.	Norderhaug, HC C. "Effects of climate and eutrophication on the diversity of hard bottom communities on the Skagerrak coast 1990-2010." Marine ecology progress series 530 (2015): 29-46.
description	5.	Cochrane, S. "Benthic macrofauna and productivity regimes in the Barents Sea - Ecological implications in a changing Arctic." Journal of sea research 61.4 (2009): 222-233.
description	6.	Fratantoni, Richard J. S. "Disentangling the effects of climate, abundance, and size on the distribution of marine fish: an example based on four stocks from the Northeast US shelf." ICES journal of marine science 72.5 (2014): 1311-1322.
description	7.	Cochrane, S. K. J. H. "Benthic fauna and functional traits along a Polar Front transect in the Barents Sea - Advancing tools for ecosystem-scale assessments." Journal of marine systems 94 (2012): 204-217.
description	8.	Brady, A F. "How do we know if managed realignment for coastal habitat compensation is successful? Insights from the implementation of the EU Birds and Habitats Directive in England." Ocean & coastal management 143: 164-174.
description	9.	Gall, Sarah C. "Evaluating the social acceptability of Marine Protected Areas." Marine Policy 65 (2016): 30-38.
description	10.	Reigstad, M. "Vertical export of particulate organic carbon: attenuation, composition and loss rates in the northern Barents Sea." Deep-sea research. Part 1. Oceanographic research papers 55.20 (2008): 2308-.
description	11.	Knack, Jennifer J.. "A metagenome for lacustrine Cladophora (Cladophorales) reveals remarkable diversity of eukaryotic epibionts and genes relevant to materials cycling." Journal of phycology 51.3 (2015): 408-418.
description	12.	Bramanti, L. "Using demographic models to project the effects of climate change on scleractinian corals: Pocillopora damicornis as a case study." Coral reefs 34.2 (2015): 505-515.
description	13.	Delaney, A. "On unequal footing: Stakeholder perspectives on the marine strategy framework directive as a mechanism of the ecosystem-based approach to marine management." Marine Policy 36.3 (2012): 658-666.
description	14.	Matishov, GG. "Macrobenthic fauna of the Franz Josef Land archipelago." Polar biology 32.2: 169-180.
description	15.	Grall, J. "Community structure and food web based on stable isotopes (þ15N and þ13C) analysis of a North Eastern Atlantic maerl bed." Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology 338.1 (2006): 1-15.
description	16.	OPPENHEIMER, M. "CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL-POLLUTION - PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS." Climatic change 15.1-2 (1989): 255-270.
description	17.	Davidson, C. "Structural gradients in an intertidal hard-bottom community : examining vertical, horizontal, and taxonomic clines in zoobenthic biodiversity." Marine biology 146.4 (2005): 827-839.
description	18.	Grip, K. "International marine environmental governance: A review." Ambio 46.4 (2016): 413-427.
description	19.	Liu, P. "Nutrient Enrichment Coupled with Sedimentation Favors Sea Anemones over Corals." PLoS ONE 10.4 (2015).
description	20.	Adams, Vanessa M. "Improving social acceptability of marine protected area networks : A method for estimating opportunity costs to multiple gear types in both fished and currently unfished areas." Biological conservation 144.1 (2011): 350-361.