SFX by Ex Libris Inc.

Title:	Upping the ante: a conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments
Source:	Science and Public Policy [0302-3427] Burgess, Jacquelin yr:2006

Basic

Sorry, no full text available...

Please use the document delivery service (see below)

Holding information

Holdings in library search engine ALBERT

Document delivery

Request document via Library/Bibliothek

Users interested in this article also expressed an interest in the following:
description	1.	Stirling, A. ""Opening up" and "closing down": Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology." Science, technology & human values 33.2 (2008): 262-294.
description	2.	Cook, G. "'The Scientists Think and the Public Feels': Expert Perceptions of the Discourse of GM Food." Discourse & society 15.4 (2004): 433-449.
description	3.	Parkinson, J. "Hearing Voices: Negotiating Representation Claims In Public Deliberation 1." British journal of politics & international relations 6.3 (2004): 370-388.
description	4.	Rogers-Hayden, T. "Moving engagement "upstream"? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry." Public understanding of science 16.3 (2007): 345-364.
description	5.	Blok, A. "Experts on public trial: on democratizing expertise through a Danish consensus conference." Public understanding of science 16.2 (2007): 163-182.
description	6.	Leach, M. "Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: Narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability." Global Environmental Change 20.3 (2010): 369-377.
description	7.	Lengwiler, M. "Participatory approaches in science and technology - Historical origins and current practices in critical perspective." Science, technology & human values 33.2 (2007): 186-200.
description	8.	McDowall, W. "Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: A multi-criteria sustainability appraisal of competing hydrogen futures." International journal of hydrogen energy 32.18 (2007): 4611-4626.
description	9.	Guston, H Guston and Daniel Sarewitz H. "Real-time technology assessment." Technology in Society 24.1-2 (2002): 93-109.
description	10.	Howarth, Robert W. "Natural gas: Should fracking stop?" Nature 477.7364 (2011): 271-275.
description	11.	Cook, G. ""Words of mass destruction": British newspaper coverage of the genetically modified food debate, expert and non-expert reactions." Public understanding of science 15.1 (2006): 5-29.
description	12.	Pidgeon, N. "Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or 'upstream engagement'?" Health, risk & society 9.2 (2007): 191-210.
description	13.	Allum, N. "Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysis." Public understanding of science 17.1 (2008): 35-54.
description	14.	Wallington, T. "Reflections on the Legitimacy of Regional Environmental Governance: Lessons from Australia's Experiment in Natural Resource Management." Journal of environmental policy & planning 10.1 (2008): 1-30.
description	15.	Forst, R. "The Rule of Reasons: Three Models of Deliberative Democracy." Ratio juris 14.4 (2002): 345-378.
description	16.	Burri, RV V. "Public perception of nanotechnology." Journal of nanoparticle research 10.3 (2008): 387-391.
description	17.	Martin, -. "'Ordinary people only': Knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare." Sociology of health & illness 30.1 (2008): 35-54.
description	18.	Chilvers, J. "Deliberating Competence: Theoretical and Practitioner Perspectives on Effective Participatory Appraisal Practice." Science, technology & human values 33.3 (2008): 421-451.
description	19.	Young, N. "Experts' understanding of the public: knowledge control in a risk controversy." Public understanding of science 16.2 (2007): 123-144.
description	20.	Falk, J.H. H. "Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning." Public understanding of science 16.4 (2007): 455-469.